mtdesmoines
Friday, January 4th, 2008, 11:07 PM
QUOTE (tskillz187 @ Friday, January 4th, 2008, 4:07 PM)

That's fine and probably appropriate for your relationships. But girls that end up dating me, fell for me because I was cocky and talked down to them, in a (not so) jokingly manner. Basically their attraction to me, besides my manly great looks, is my dickhead personality. So that's who they like. How can they be so mad when that same dickhead personality rears its ugly head? Not that cheating is okay, just that it should be more acceptable for me, because it's obviously just physical and it would be very easy (and most practical) to never talk to the person I slept with again. The same wouldn't be the case for my girlfriends. What I'm trying to say is...that you're a fucking girl.
OK, I'm gonna let you all in on a little secret about women. I may suck at poker, but I do know the shit out of women. Many, many,
many women tend to confuse their intense negative and positive emotional responses when it comes to much of anything. But they really are fundamentally unable to segregate positive and negative when it comes to their emotions involving men; when a man is an *******, all they understand is that they are having a STRONG response. And nothing feels better to a woman than strong feelings. So they repeat the experience of strong feelings. They go back again and again.
That's why you see women with assholes.
That's why assholes treat women the way they do.
That is why Oprah has a show about women who don't understand why the men they love "seem" like assholes.
It's because they are like tskillz187.
QUOTE (CobaltBlue @ Friday, January 4th, 2008, 6:53 PM)

They don't. Ideally, they're intertwined. I'm aware it's bad. I hesitate to talk about spiritual struggles here, cause I'm pretty sure they're not really going to be understood, but I suppose some elaboration is necessary in this case. As a Christian, it's ideal to cut out "lust". In the past, one suggestion from the community leaders has been to think of Christian girls as your sisters. Okay...so I cut that out. The problem is that I've made this terrible rationalization in my mind that non-Christian girls are available as "objects" in my head. This is not to say that I walk around with that mindset. It's actually quite rare that I think of sex with a girl during regular, everyday interaction. My hope is to cut all of it out, but you've got insight as to where I'm currently at.
As a "Christian" older than you (yeah, I know....), I'm not sure I approve of the tendency toward sexual repression that you're getting from your church. I understand the instruction to keep sexuality within the boundaries of marriage. But I think your "rationalization" is clearly a malignant outgrowth of the repression.
QUOTE (David_Nicoson @ Friday, January 4th, 2008, 7:10 PM)

You're a smart guy and very self-aware, so there's not a lot I can tell you that's news. The danger is that when you start thinking of thinking of sexual energy as something shameful, you might be more tempted to experience sex in a way that consistent with that.
Said better than I just did.
QUOTE (CobaltBlue @ Friday, January 4th, 2008, 8:26 PM)

Verses?
Nah. I don't think of sexual energy as something shameful. I just think of it as having a proper outlet. And, I've done relatively decent at not having sex yet. I mean, I've had opportunities, but I'm still a virgin. (Mentally...not so much.)
? ... (chuckling) You either have or you haven't.
Don't get the impression that I don't admire and respect you. OK?
QUOTE (krup24 @ Friday, January 4th, 2008, 8:50 PM)

i know a bunch of practicing Christians all of whom are very taboo to gambling and several have told me that my playing poker is a sin and all this and that. i just said that because the thought of a poker player practicing Christian seems kinda like an oxymoron based on how i've been berated by friends and family. if you can give me a verse where it says it is not a sin then i would love to pass it on.
there is a ton on Christian/gambling at the link below
http://www.ag.org/top/Beliefs/Position_Pap...86_gambling.cfmThe last people secular people should listen to about Christianity is random groups of Christian zealots. It brings to mind my experience last night.
So I went to the caucus. And I'm a Republican. Reaganite to the soul. And we caucused. And we selected our delegates, our chair and we voted. Then we worked on the grassroots Republican planks. And the first five were "God in the Pledge," "God on the money," etc. etc. etc. Nary a word about national security, immigration, trade imbalance or the value of the dollar. I was very frustrated ...
QUOTE (David_Nicoson @ Friday, January 4th, 2008, 8:55 PM)

Right, slutty girls. Err, wait.
I love trashy "get to it" women.
QUOTE (Acid_Knight @ Friday, January 4th, 2008, 9:16 PM)

To divert the conversation to something more appropriate: Naismith and I have decided on the wagering terms for the Tampa Bay-New York Giants game on Sunday. The person whose team loses, will be subjected to a fate worse than any embarrassment or monetary penalties. No, the fan with the shittiest team will be forced to: 4 TABLE FULL RING LIMIT HOLDEM FOR AN HOUR!!!! Either one of us might be willing to cut off our pinky toe to avoid this. We will see how things pan out.
I like the pinky toe escape clause. It's more interesting than the hour of limit hold em.