Or I'm just friendly. I figure he needed the $20, he was scared to shove 2pr on that board to that action.

You made a tough, but good fold, Jay.

Everyone copy the above sentence. Click on the reply to topic button, hit paste and then complete the posting process.

Thanks.

No, but apparently there are plans to combine the player base eventually.

*************

People are soooooooooooooo misinformed and fatalistic about the AP situation.

AP is not going to shut down.

It doens't matter if they lose the business of 2p2ers and p5ers. Seriously.

Do you know how little they make off of these people? With the exception of the really high stakes players who put in a million hands, and there are only a few of them on the site to begin with.

People like me and 1000 others who simply grind 3/6 LHE with 30% rakeback, constantly reloading with bonus, trading our ARPs for cash, they make like no money off of. Literally.

They aren't going to lose the business of the fish, of the tards who don't read forums; they don't know about rakeback, they don't understand bonus, etc. They just play, and give their money away in rake. In the end, AP gets it all back anyways, even if they have bonus, rakeback, etc, cuz they'll just keep playing with it.

I'm also 99% sure this will never happen again on AP.

This was a singular rogue employee, by most accounts, and has nothing to do with AP as a whole. It's not like AP management is working on a team of people to play high stakes poker with superuser accounts to pad their pockets. I'm certain the access to these accounts is permanently gone right now.

Meanwhile, AP handled it retardedly, but meh. They sent out the whole HHs before anyone ever found out about the superuser thing. I have no idea why they'd give out the IP and email and all that crap, but whatever. They also tried to cover this up like anyone else would if the same thing happened. They would say they had no part in it, and try to sweep it under the rug to keep it as quiet as possible. But either way. They still handled it retardedly.

None of this affects my confidence in the company, or me leaving my entire roll on their site.

meh I am happy on Stars and Tilt... I know they don't have the bonuses but I don't play the volume of hands I use to. Stars $50 6 max you can always find a donkey spewing money in 30 minutes.

For you hockey fans out there. Jesse Boulerice went to my highschool. He did us proud.

I'm not sure I could switch my main girl from Bridget to anyone. She's slamming, imo. She was also born like 2 miles from where I live
I also sort of think Gisele has a screwy face, but I'm picky.



Why can't I just come up with this shit. I'd be super happy playing .5/1 LHE for the rest of my life and winning 40% of hands.
I heard the schmuck blew it by winning like 90% of hands and playing every single hand perfectly, like calling an all-in HU in a 1k MTT with Ten high against a 9 high flush draw.



Tskillz is a moron.

Lay off the poor kid, the Eagles finally won a game

Well, my guess is that she showed them to the two guys next to her as she "lamented her bad luck" before mucking them. One of them noticed that she had a full house and decided to confirm that.

LOL.

L337.

FYP

At least AP has hired a third party company to come in and verify that there games aren't rigged.

I am sick and at work today... it is going to be a long ass day.


RED SOX MAKE ME SAD!!!

sorry, I flipped over to the game to check the score...it was still scoreless but you know what happens anytime I watch a Wakefield game...

AP already is the softest site.

Everyone thinks it's tough though. It's awesome.

I will say that I've never played worse NL players than my brief flirtations with AP.

That said, I wouldn't put a dime on that site right now.

For those that don't want to search all the links...

http://www.pocketfives.com/1A2FB2BB-5CD5-4...EDECE3DF73.aspx

Three posts in a row...gah.

Tonight, I'm re-opening my completely legal, rake-free poker game. I'm pretty pumped as the lineup of players this evening should be pretty craptastic.

There are a couple aspects to the previous sentence that are untrue.

I'm guessing it's the part about the players being bad?

Calling with T high when you're using a rigged account is really dumb

-legal
-rake-free
-pumped
-craptastic
-poker game

Did I get them all?

sweeetness, what spurred on the underground card room?

Inability to pull the trigger with two pair in $100 max 1-2nl.

He's gonna teach these punks a lesson at 5c-10c, $10max, 25c minimum rake/hand.

lol wp I am bored at work... someone needs to post more to entertain me, or at least post an interesting hand.

Sheiky I see you lurking help me out

Can any of you guys talk hockey betting with me?

Haha, www.donkeytest.com

See if you can beat me 101.

I think I found this JFarrel character... or at least his spawn:

http://www.poker-strategy.org/default.aspx...mp;PostID=47669

read this thread at your own risk

This test teaches you how to play like a Nit... also, if you put in the exact same answers, only faster, you'll get a higher score...

And some of those questions you know what they're looking for despite the fact that you'd never actually play that way.

"Stacks are 10,000 each
You are on the button with KK and raise to 500
An egyptian mummy that has lain dormant for 1000 years reraises you to 2000 from the BB.
Do you:
A. Fold
B. Call
C. Raise to 5000
D. Raise all in"

Admit it, you scored less than me didn't you?

105, but that was like 6 months ago.

Yeh i agree it's a stupid test.

On another note, does anyone else find it odd that Full Tilt give Ivey his own $500/$1000 NL HU table yet whenever larsluzak sits down he won't play him? I've been watching every night and i haven't seen a card dealt on the NL table yet.

I met Eric Lindros once.

Well... can you datamine at FT with anything?

Ivey is a smart guy... he knows ppl who sit down once will come back

sure

I hockey.

He's also smart enough to not play people if he feels he doesn't have an edge.

Zach I woulda switched Crosby and Malkin in ur hockey bets w/ serge

As for hockey bets take the over in most all of pits games.

I was looking for some fair-ish bets. I mean, Crosby is obv gonna get more points than Sundin. Malkin and Sundin were even last year, so I just assume that Malkin will crush him this year. The goals thing was close from last year too, with Blake's 40, and Crosby's 39 or whatever he had, so I just went with those.

I took the over in the Pens game tonight vs the Devils. Dev's are usually low scoring, but their defense is worse this year than last, and their last game was 6-5 vs Atlanta, who suck balls.

I also took Chi -1.5 tonight.

I'm almost pissed that I only scored 115. I JUST WANT TO BE A HSP PRO GOD.

I crushed the Tournament questions though, 143

118 bitches.

That was a few months ago when I was good at poker though, meh.

my bbv

Finally I make a big call?? At 10/20 hu...been uncomfy there but he seemed soft so I sat.

123 hands in, this is #124.

Full Tilt Poker
No Limit Holdem Ring game
Blinds: $10/$20
2 players
Converter

Stack sizes:
Hero: $2602.50
BB: $2792

Pre-flop: (2 players) Hero is SB with 9 5
Hero raises to $60, BB raises to $140, Hero calls.

Flop: 5 8 7 ($280, 2 players)
BB bets $220, Hero calls.

Turn: Q ($720, 2 players)
BB bets $450, Hero calls.

River: Q ($1620, 2 players)
BB is all-in $1982, Hero calls all-in $1792.5.
Uncalled bets: $189.5 returned to BB.

Results:
Final pot: $5205
BB showed Ts Js
Hero showed 9h 5h

- Jordan

anyway, on 2+2 i had to provide my reasoning behind the call but i really dont feel like it here. lets just bask in the awesomeness.

oh, and fwiw, villain played this hand really well in my opinion...except for PF.

I got a 132 on my first try.

Yeah, he either needs to flat-call PF or re-raise a bit bigger. I also don't think he needs to bet quite as big on the flop/turn/river. I mean, the board has some draws...but if that's why he was betting so big on the flop/turn, he doesn't need to bet that big on the river if you missed. I guess it depends on what he's put you on...small pair and a draw?

turn bet in my opinion should have been a little more I think.

flop seems fine to me.

turn i think he'd of bet harder though with a hand incase I had a hand like I did...unless of course his standard line here with overpair is bet/fold so he bets cheap..but i doubt that's the case.

no more analysis though, did a lot of 2+2, kinda...maybe i'll post more.

def not standard call though, lets just say i was on the level he was on, and then i went to the next, so I won.

I woulda laughed tho had he shown qqqq

- Jordan

You HU NL players are crazy

Mine was first try too! That's a little embarassing to me that I am basically a full standard deviation away from you. That's pretty huge once you get past the first deviation. Teach me pokahs, plzktx.

I did terrible on the big pairs part, I wonder why I suck so much.

Ha. It's by no means a comprehensive quiz. It just means that I know a lot of "answers". Considering I've read every major poker book outside of the Cloutier/McEvoy series, have subscribed to CP for a few years, have been posting on here that long, and also watch 8 hours of poker TV per week...well, I definitely should know answers. Now whether I always apply them correctly...that's a matter of debate. I think I scored pretty highly on Harrington's 3rd book also (like I snuck into whatever the top tier was).

The evolution of tilt:

Start the day normally:
WoeUntoMe posts the big blind of $1

Stack off 100 real fast with set over set:
WoeUntoMe posts the big blind of $2

Up 300 real fast, then somehow down 300
WoeUntoMe posts the big blind of $4

KK loses to KK AIPF for a buyin:
WoeUntoMe posts the big blind of $20

Any of you guys do this as well, or am I one of the few who play 50/1 and 10/20 within the span of hours. Tskillz seems to thinks its not a winning strategy.

(Some background, I have played a bunch of 5/10 live, and some 10/20, so I am fairly comfortable with the stakes, just saying I'm not a small stakes only who is way out of his league, altough i probably am, but then again, out of all the stakes, the 10/20 seemed the softest, anyone else find this?)

uh, 5/10 and 10/20 live... not close to 5/10 and 10/20 online... fyi.

http://www.fullcontactpoker.com/poker-foru...showtopic=98917

146 FTW.

From what I remember, I preferred some of the 'wrong' answers but gave the answer I thought they were looking for.

Wait, what? Online plays diff than live!?