iggymcfly
Wednesday, August 8th, 2007, 12:50 PM
QUOTE (Skittles @ Wednesday, August 8th, 2007, 4:45 AM)

This is what I'm thinking, probably slightly less than a 2:1 dog against something like AAxx, which makes the call marginal. Preflop is obviously fine.
We're slightly less than a 2:1 dog if villian has exactly AAJTds with our spades covered. Against most AAxx combos, we're in much better shape. If villian has say AAT4 with one suit that's not ours, we're 43% and if villian has AA23 with no suits, we're actually 48%. I don't have numbers against all AAxx combos, but it probably averages out to about 41-42%.
This is the perfect kind of hand to 3-bet in position since the cards are low enough that we're completely misrepresenting our holding, but at the same time, being a complete connector, it's absolute value will still be fairly strong when 4-bet. I'd three-bet this a lot of the time in your position, and I certainly wouldn't say it's bad, but it would be better if you and UTG were just a
little deeper. You'd really like to have some play left on the flop when you get repopped.
Also, if you're going to 3-bet, you definitely want to do it for the full pot, you got that right. It's way easier for your opponents to put you on a "trash hand" instead of big cards when you don't 3-bet for the maximum amount possible.