sierradave
Friday, July 20th, 2007, 6:48 AM
QUOTE (tskillz187 @ Friday, July 20th, 2007, 1:54 AM)

Checking river is better than betting river, by betting the river you don't get to go to showdown or you have to call a bigger bet to get there when you are behind. It's also tough to see many value bet hands here that you are ahead of.
Checking river you get to induce bluff from someone holding something like 7x or 10J to win money when they otherwise wouldn't put money in and when they have the flush you got to showdown for cheaper.
That's where the opponent's playing style is important. I'd definitely check-call a habitual bluffer, but plenty of people at the lower stakes don't bluff much. If I'm up against someone who doesn't bluff much, I'd make a $2 blocking bet on this river and fold to a raise.
Major question is does this person feel more comfortable calling bets or making bets. If they're a caller, make the blocking bet, set the price, and get paid off by a hand like a7 or 87. If their a bettor/raiser, check-call. The problem with that is villain likely got there and by letting him set the price, you're making his call on the turn correct from an implied odds standpoint.