PokerStars 2/4 Hold'em (6 handed) Hand History Converter Tool from FlopTurnRiver.com (Format: FlopTurnRiver)

Preflop: Hero is BB with 8, 6.
4 folds, SB raises, Hero calls.

Flop: (4 SB) 8, 6, 4 (2 players)
SB bets, Hero raises, SB 3-bets, Hero caps, SB calls.

Turn: (6 BB) Q (2 players)
SB bets, Hero raises, SB 3-bets, Hero calls.

River: (12 BB) 6 (2 players)
SB bets, Hero raises, SB 3-bets, Hero caps, SB calls.

Final Pot: 20 BB

I would pretty much need a read to help you here.

Flop is great, turn may just be a call.

River is great.

My interpretation on each of Villain's bets:
(assuming he is not a maniac)

Preflop raise = Could mean anything decent, depending on the villain.
Flop Lead = This gives us no additional info.
Flop 3bet = This implies stregth, but could just be a continuation blind-battle 3bet assuming we made a positional bluff raise.
Turn Lead = He is no longer fooling around. Villain has something substantial. The Queen at the least. And overpair likely.
River Lead = This gives us no additional information.
River 3bet = Villain has now shown aggression a whopping 7 times despite the fact that we have been fighting back.
He has more than an overpair.
Considering his preflop raise, he unlikely conencted with 2 pair on the flop like we did.
Considering his Turn lead, he does not have trip 6's (since I put him on more than A6 at that point).
This leads me to believe that he has a set that filled up on the river.
QQ, 88, 44.

We beat one of these hands.
We lose to the other 2.

I play preflop, flop, turn the exact same as you.
On the river, if I use my above logic, I likely only call the river 3bet.
If Villain has shown any LAG tendencies, I don't slow down though.


--CM

CM, can you add 57 to your range that villain plays like this?

No.

Villain's postflop action could certainly represent a Straight.

But I refuse to think Villain would open raise with 75 from the small blind.

--cm

Seriously?

Any halfway aggro player will raise anything remotely connected, suited, etc there.