I agree completely about players being disrespectful(to put it mildly), especially online, but I think Daniel is being pretty hypocritical as to someone's choice of when and when not to play. When Daniel bought in at the no limit game at Wynn for $125,000 he argued that a player has the choice to leave a game anytime they want to. Now that he disagree's with someone's choice to play it's bad ettiquette?Just my 2 cents.