Jump to content

TheSheriff

Members
  • Content Count

    10
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

0 Neutral

About TheSheriff

  • Rank
    Poker Forum Newbie
  1. I like your decisions better if you have K Q .Nonetheless, pushing this flop is incorrect.Just calling the flop is giving you about 3 to 1 odds (given the SB will call 200 more) with 12 outs to more-than-likely best hand and two streets to go.I don't see why you want to get this hand heads up for a race on the flop. Induce the SB call, play the turn appropriately.
  2. There he goes again, this time from HEFAP.You keep that book on you, don't you brother?Trono, any post where you include results (even in white) put you immediately on the defensive. You are on the right track slowplaying this flop,A situation where you might want to consider this heavily (even in small stakes) is if the flop has about 6-7 SB in it, and you are bet into with a player behind you. Then you could consider just calling to induce action from the player behind you. Then your action on the turn will be more trivial and will be for more value.Nice hand by the way
  3. wrto, i have noticed you would save yourself lots of time replying to simple questions if you demanded from everyone that ask you a question like this that they read SSHE.of course this is a joke, but not really.because it will save all these inspiring Limit players a lot of time, and most importantly, money
  4. First HandCap the flop. Q-Q and 10-10 should not be any worry to you here without an aggressor pre-flop. The SB having 7-7 is scary, but you nailed this flop, and I would cap it for value against flush draws.Turn is fine.Raise the river, and call a three bet. You think someone hung around with 4-6? Looks more like Q-5 to me.Second HandI three-bet this flop, and I know I will catch a lot of heat for this, but given the BB's pre-flop aggression, he COULD have AA or KK, but he also could have JJ, 10, 99, or 88. Three-bet it and see how he moves. Also a three-bet puts a decision on the CO to call
  5. Got you on your heels now! :)Hmm, I'm not so sure.Again, three-betting is contingent on MP1's involvement in the hand. He just called PF and just calls my flop lead. He doesnt have a K and probably is dumping his hand here to the PF aggressors on the turn 80% of the time, in which case my flop 3bet doesnt have the odds to be of value.
  6. I just don't agree with the C/R. The move is completely contingent on the MP1 play, and he didnt show any strength PF and is behind the PF aggressor on a paired board. I can do the math on this after work if no one else nominates themselves to do it before then.I could be wrong, but I dont think so.
  7. I guess you misread the turn line.As for the flop, I still think leading out is better, I might go for a C/R with one more player.Thoughts?
  8. Party Poker 2/4 Hold'em (10 handed) converterPreflop: Hero is UTG with A:diamond:, Q:diamond: Hero raises, 2 folds, MP1 calls, 2 folds, CO 3-bets, 3 folds, Hero calls, MP1 calls.Standard stuff. Raise AQs in EP, then have to call one more with it from CO (who is a rock) in bad position. Ugh.Flop: (10.5 SB) K:diamond:, K:club:, 3:diamond: (3 players)Hero bets, MP1 calls, CO raises, Hero calls, MP1 calls.There is a good argument against leading this flop, given the CO is likely to raise, but the CO is a player who I believe respects me, and is only raising with a hand I am behind at the moment.
×
×
  • Create New...