SmileyHere
Members-
Content Count
12 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Community Reputation
0 NeutralAbout SmileyHere
-
Rank
Poker Forum Newbie
Profile Information
-
Gender
Male
-
oK ... I checked the railbabe interview, and since I'm also a railbird, I read it... nothing about Krablar... her fav hand is the "twisted Lady" whatever that isAnd as far as "clicking on the link below"... I did that too... this time I just hit edit find "krablar"... no items found Close windowReally I don't care that much anywayIf if it's K3, i would consider putting it here:King Three offsuitand I could put "Twisted Lady" as well where ever that would go
-
obviously you should have been directing "positive thaughts" tword the team that was diagnosing and fixing the problem... not relaxing so that WHEN you could work you would be at maximum effieciency
-
I might consider mentioning something about a "Wrongful Termination" counter suit if they persue any legal action against you. I alos am not a lawyer, but I doubt that they wanna become a deffendant
-
NMI get it K crab, Krablerstill a horrible hand
-
K 3 off suit?Is that your fav hand or something?
-
yeah I guess there are two L's at the enhttp://www.thefreedictionary.com/didacticallyThe first definition is bestThe third definition shows that it is in fact excessive... in that (2 choose 2) is actually = 1... but the idea that it is there as (2 choose 2) explains something ... specifically chooseing 2 of the two remaining aces... and therefore is informative, but exsesive in that it is not really needed for calculation... and that is WHY i used the term didactically, even if i did spell it wrongLater... I'm outFlame away ROTFLMFAO
-
And whether i spelled didacticaly correctly or not...(as I don't claim to be a good speller)what it means that "so as to teach"...
-
Balloon Guy... My figures are NOT wrongBut thanks for being nice:-P
-
No KiddingLMFAO
-
Like I said... I did the math on my owndid a search to confirm my resultsfound this siteJoined ... and tried to contribute my resultsI don't think I did anything wrongI didn't just confirm here... I ADDEDThe formula I give is Didacticaly superior to the previously mentioned stuffIf you weren't being rude, I appologize, but next time you might say "Hi" or something nice... since it is difficult to determine "tone" in a forum, and I don't think that my determination that you were being less than friendly was by any stretch og the imagination unreasonableI hope that warmer welcomes are in my futu
-
whatever... you go outta your way to be jerks to e new user?I did nuthing wrongI did this math on my own, then found this site on a search...Joined... posted my findings only to get ripped on by "the friendly users here"Wow... I guess I'm not impressed
-
MrNiceGuy is correctthe general formula is [ ( 4 choose 2) / (52 choose 2) ] * [ ( 2 choose 2 ) / ( 50 choose 2 ) ] * (P choose 2)where P is the number of playersofcourse you need to know how to evaluate the binomial coeifficents... and of course (4 choose 2) = 6 (2 choose 2) = 1 (52 choose 2) = 1326(50 choose 2) = 1225and (P choose 2) = 45 36 28 21 15 10 6 3 2 ( P=10 to P=2 respectively)MrNiceGuy did round a bit early however... I get 1 in 6016.11 ten handed but close enoughand for other "handedness":10: 1 in 6,0169: 1 in 7,5208: 1 in 9,6697: 1 in 12,8926: 1 in 18,0485: 1 in
