FishtankHank

he's right there's too much money in there.

Gratz

Well, I play high all the time... in fact I mostly play high and I have good results. So I guess it just depends how your tolerance is.

My personal experience has been 5.50 for 100 dollars. I started with 300 on Full Tilt playing 10 SnGos and built it up to about 800 right now in almost two months. Now i'm playing 20 SnGos and I'm pretty sure I'm playing conserative for the bankroll size but it works for me. I do have to say in about 200 sngos or so the longest streak I've had without cashing is like 7 or 8 in a row so keep that in mind. GL.

My chat is currently banned on FTP... the month is almost over but I have to agree, I have been on a damn sweet winning streak this month. Except for today I was getting the bad beats. I doubt I will continue chat after they reinstate mine.

Woaahh, buddy... the bible is in its basic form some dude somewhere. I think my reply is late though lol.

I probably don't have a great point, but I was discussing religion in general with a few friends of mine (I'm agnostic and so is my friend and the other two were christians that I grew up with) I used to be christian as a child and when I grew up I made the switch based upon what I knew to be true. Anyhow, me and my agnostic buddy feel that man's greatest weapons or tool is logic. Our christian friends only basic argument in the end was that faith overruled logic. This could be true, I suppose, but sense me and my buddy believe that logic is human's greatest weapon and tool we also therefo

Do palm strikes work for you?

I imagine the best being high can do while playing poker is soften the bad beats and the worst it's gonna do is make you tired while playing or make you more easily forget previous hands. But I've never tried playing high, however it's certainly crossed my mind. ****, at least you'll enjoy yourself.

There's a time for laying down a royal flush?

Yea my post sucks.

Dude I've KK preflop plenty of times, and YES IN CASH GAMES but I was usually drunk and got distracted by more beer and/or liquor.

This thread went from something about Daniel to a neverending argument about who is better Phil Helmuth or Daniel Negreanu and then it went to who had better results in 2002-2005 Phil or Daniel and then when it was discovered that Daniel overall had better results than phil in those years the phil backers decided to create a new argument about whether Phil was successful or not during those years. I love it, keep it going!

These arguments are always hilarious because they never get anywhere. Since there are no definitive answer it's usually just one person trying to sound more intelligent than the other. Therefore alcohol is needed.

I'm sure you know, but if you didn't this picture if from a Magic the Gathering Pro Tour, I would guess it's a pro tour since he's a pro tour player... or was I don't know.