cemvardar

I posted this under another subject but I think this would be a better place for more people to see this.If you like or hate Michael Moore films and if you want to see a different perspective about unregulated corporation capitalism watch the documentatry called The Corporation. Noam Chomsky and Michael Moore are in the movie but so are Milton Friedman and CEOs of big corporations. It is obviously another 'point of view' documentary against big corporations which IMHO is much more elegant than Michael Moore's latest Fahrenheit 9/11 but still somewhat entertaining. It gives a pretty good idea a

they just shot down the server...

am hanging there with 976 chips:)

Hey Jayson, it is not easy to explain the basic point of the movie in a forum post but anyways I'll try.The corporation by legal definition is a 'person' who can only care about the benefit of its stock holders and nothing else. Executives of a corporation are legally bound to make decisions thinking only about the EV of their corporation (like a poker player:) and should not care (legally) if he/she is doing a moral thing or he/she is harming others or the environment).So the executives of a corporation cannot say things like "Oh we are exploiting the hell out of poor starving sweat shop chil

If you like or hate Michael Moore films and if you want to see a different perspective about unregulated corporation capitalism watch the documentatry called The Corporation. Noam Chomsky and Michael Moore are in the movie but so are Milton Friedman and CEOs of big corporations. It is obviously another 'point of view' documentary against big corporations which IMHO is much more elegant than Michael Moore's latest Fahrenheit 9/11 but still somewhat entertaining. It gives a pretty good idea about how can unregulated corporation capitalism can go wrong. You can get it from Netflix or Amazon. Als

I am really impressed by Harrington's book. I think that the sections where he explains the thoguht process that you need to employ is brilliant. I had also read the TJ& McEvoy's book. I wasn't inpressed at all. It was full of generalizations which are useless in specific situation I come across everyday.

I don't believe this statement is correct here.If he has an ace you have just 11outs ( 9:club: and 2 Jacks). I agree this is unlikely but possible (and actually he did have an Ace). 11/47 is your pure pot odds.If he has a 6 or a 10 then you have 6 additional outs (KKK and QQQ) which gives you 17/47. But you should trim these pot odds a little because he might already have a staight, or two pair or a set(highly unlikely)Otherwise he is on cold bluff, which gives you a rough 70- 80% chance of winning in the end, if you don;t reraise him and make him fold.(this one assumes you already have the

i think suited connecters are a little more valuable in a ring game and in situations where lots of people limp in. In a short ended game (esspecially with low suited connectors) the probability of you flopping the nuts and your opponent having a strong hand to pay you is really low. If your oppenent had been holding pp<10s or AK AQ AJ he wouldn''t pay you all his money.