Concealed Handgun
#1
Posted 22 May 2007 - 11:33 AM
Do any of you have one?
What are some suggestions?
I don't know much about guns, but I want/need a safety on it and want to be well educated on the weapon I get.
I kinda like the revolvers more than the semi-automatics, but not sure of the differences or benefits of either.
Holla back.
Oh, post some pics if you can.
#2
Posted 22 May 2007 - 11:37 AM
#3
Posted 22 May 2007 - 11:42 AM
#4
Posted 22 May 2007 - 11:48 AM



#5
Posted 22 May 2007 - 11:48 AM
Thats good advice.
#6
Posted 22 May 2007 - 11:49 AM
Do any of you have one?
What are some suggestions?
I don't know much about guns, but I want/need a safety on it and want to be well educated on the weapon I get.
I kinda like the revolvers more than the semi-automatics, but not sure of the differences or benefits of either.
Holla back.
Oh, post some pics if you can.
Something safe - LOL
Yet cool looking - If it's going to be concealed and stored in the house, why would it need to be "cool" looking.
#7
Posted 22 May 2007 - 11:50 AM
Yet cool looking - If it's going to be concealed and stored in the house, why would it need to be "cool" looking.
Because I want to use it at a range smarty.
I <3 super soakers though.
#8
Posted 22 May 2007 - 12:04 PM
#9
Posted 22 May 2007 - 12:08 PM
"I really wish Colt hadn't discontinued its line of small autos"
I think the OP wants a new gun and not a second hand gun.
http://mywebpages.comcast.net/shooter2_indy/g35.html
cant go past a glock as a first gun.
#10
Posted 22 May 2007 - 12:10 PM
I think the OP wants a new gun and not a second hand gun.
A well cared for Colt is better than any "new" gun. Besides, pocket ponys have style.
#12
Posted 22 May 2007 - 12:14 PM
Smith and Wesson seemed to have an array of choices.
#13
Posted 22 May 2007 - 12:14 PM
Yeah but a person who is asking about guns on a poker forum shouldnt go second hand gun shoping the same way that a person who can bearly change a tyre shouldnt go second hand car shoping.
#14
Posted 22 May 2007 - 12:15 PM

How can you intimidate someone with a concealed gun? If it's concealed it's good for nothing. This is what you need.
Or bare minimum...
#15
Posted 22 May 2007 - 12:36 PM
Or you could go for a .50 caliber, just because they can shoot through bullet proof glass. Which is always cool.
Life is like a game of cards. The hand that is dealt you is determinism; the way you play it is free will.
#16
Posted 22 May 2007 - 12:39 PM
Or go with a Moonraker.
#17
Posted 22 May 2007 - 01:02 PM
#18
Posted 22 May 2007 - 01:20 PM
Saying that you want a cool looking concealed handgun that's kept at home or used for practice at a range tells me that you're confused and that you should not have a gun.
#19
Posted 22 May 2007 - 01:46 PM
I own enough firearms to arm a Central American revolution, yet I've never, ever purchased a single one of them with any regard to how they "look".
I am a hard core Glock guy. Always have been, always will be. I've basically owned 'everything' once and just haven't found anything superior to Glocks.
Also, I will add that I actually use my firearms. I don't store them in cases in closets and pamper them. I get them dirty. I shoot the everloving piss out of them. Every firearm I own has "wear" and some of them are so worn that they're worthless to anyone but me. My favorite firearms have rust pits and dings all over them.
I have yet to meet a sidearm that comes remotely close to reliability of any given Glock system.
Worst of the lot are 1911's.
Their massive popularity is a classic example of irrational collective delusion and circular, hive thinking. Even after a thousand dollars worth of "custom work", you're still operating a seriously dated system that has been drastically improved upon in the past 50 years or so. The High-Speed-Low-Drag types who love them so much are also usually carrying an M16 or a long arm of some kind. If you're relying solely on a sidearm to save your ***, there are much better choices.
Basically, if you stick in the Glock/Sig/HK/ family, you're golden. Rugers and Smith and Wessons are OK too, but you won't have any pride of ownership in them, since gun snobs look down on them (even though as functional tools, they're often times superior to the "cool guns" that the Tactical Toms love so much)
Another make that's worth looking at is the CZ series. The most accurate 9MM I own is a box stock CZ75 that shoots 2" groups @ 25 yards with cheap practice ammo. Due to the fact that they're built in the "eastern bloc", they have the advantage of being very inexpensive. If that same gun were built in Germany or Austria, it would cost 3X as much. Great, great gun. If you like revolvers, fine. Get a revolver. Rugers are tanks, Smiths are more refined plus they also offer ultra lightweight models for concealed carry that pack like a dream.
Basically, the whole "what pistol is best" debate is pointless. Sidearm design pretty much hit the wall about 30 years ago. There isn't much further it can go. The only improvements that have been made in pistol design are that of materials and CNC manufacturing techniques (the same advances that have benefited the manufacture of everything else). The "designs" are basically the same.
At present, basically every commercially offered pistol from a major manufacturer will be dead reliable and suitably accurate. The people who insist that one is "better" than the other are being dishonest and arguing minutiae and personal preference more than anything else.
Get whatever feels best to you, ignore what anyone else has to say about it, practice like hell with it and you're set.
#20
Posted 22 May 2007 - 01:55 PM
I would steer clear of any 1911 models. I know many, many shooters swear by them. But the problem I had with them was one of practicality. I hated taking it to the range because I knew I'd have a pain on my hands when I broke it down to clean it. That friggin recoil spring is impossible to get in with just two hands. Owning a gun that you don't like to shoot is not a good way to go.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users









