Jump to content


J9 Off


  • Please log in to reply
6 replies to this topic

#1 Actuary

Actuary

    .

  • Members
  • 19,026 posts

Posted 10 May 2007 - 10:53 PM

button is 28/13/2 80 hands and raises in this spot 75% of the time so far

PokerStars 0.50/1.00 Hold'em (7 handed) Hand History Converter Tool from FlopTurnRiver.com (Format: FlopTurnRiver Cards)

Preflop: Actuary is BB with , .
4 folds, Button raises, 1 fold, Actuary 3-bets, Button caps, Actuary calls.

Flop: (8.50 SB) , , (2 players)
Actuary bets, Button raises, Actuary calls.

Turn: (6.25 BB) (2 players)
Actuary checks, Button bets, Actuary calls.

River: (8.25 BB) (2 players)
Actuary checks,

I'll c/r if given the chance
I'm callng down UI after flop

not the best part of my game.
obv, read based to 3-bet, I had folded almost all.
I'm showing down winners of course

***********

did online get a bit easier again?
maybe with no rb, Pokerstars was left with amost of the donks at low limits?

#2 RISEorFall

RISEorFall

    Poker Forum Veteran

  • Members
  • 2,984 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:I'm bad, I'm nationwide
  • Favorite Poker Game:HU freezeout 4 souls

Posted 10 May 2007 - 11:57 PM

i prefer a SB 3-bet with a hand with more showdown value
but, i hate playing hands in these situations and not raising here

i hate blind situations
but i do like the river c/r
Rise,

I like the whole hand. You should play drunk more often. :)
-Screech

#3 Moneyball16

Moneyball16

    Poker Forum Veteran

  • Members
  • 2,746 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:Poker, Baseball, Movies
  • Favorite Poker Game:2-7TD or Holdem

Posted 11 May 2007 - 12:02 AM

QUOTE (RISEorFall @ Friday, May 11th, 2007, 1:57 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
i prefer a SB 3-bet with a hand with more showdown value
but, i hate playing hands in these situations and not raising here

i hate blind situations
but i do like the river c/r


We are in the BB Rise. This makes the preflop 3-bet even worse imo.

Flop is an interesting spot. Not sure what I would do.

#4 Zach6668

Zach6668

    2009 Stanley Cup Champions

  • Moderators
  • 36,830 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Thunder Bay, ON

Posted 11 May 2007 - 07:18 AM

Just call PF.

I have a question about these hands, actually. I hate these spots, and have been playing them very passively. I know in the forums I would advocate c/r'ing this flop, but lately, I've just been calling down vs the aggrotards on Crypto, because I don't want to fold a better hand when they get aggressive with their junk. Is calling down passively a bad idea?
QUOTE (serge @ Tuesday, May 12th, 2009, 7:20 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
LETS GO PITTSBURGH
QUOTE (Acid_Knight @ Monday, March 10th, 2008, 4:15 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Zach is right about pretty much everything.

#5 fleung22

fleung22

    PokerStars Global Events Rep (PokerStars Macau)

  • Members
  • 6,991 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Vancouver-->Toronto-->Macau

Posted 11 May 2007 - 08:51 AM

I definitely prefer calling preflop.

If I have my usual tight image this is one of those situations where I may choose to check-call the flop and then check-raise the turn.

As played I probably would've 3-bet the flop and decide my next steps from there.


#6 Actuary

Actuary

    .

  • Members
  • 19,026 posts

Posted 11 May 2007 - 01:32 PM

it's highly unusual for me to raise here.
very circumstantial


And, please, don't just comment on one street.

There's a flop, turn, and river too

thanks!!!

#7 TJ_Eckleburg

TJ_Eckleburg

    Drunken Short-handed Deepstacked NL Master

  • Members
  • 4,198 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Atlanta
  • Interests:Poker, sports, music, blah blah blah

Posted 12 May 2007 - 09:01 AM

I'm so proud of your wild aggressive self!

I really like flop, turn, and river, especially your plan for the river.

I see your reasons for popping him preflop... and I definitely DON'T want to discourage you from discovering your inner aggro...

But I'd probably just call preflop. There are probably better situations to mess with this guy preflop.

I really like the postflop line though.
Always bet like you've got a pair.

--Me




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users