Jump to content


Sit And Go Roi


  • Please log in to reply
5 replies to this topic

#1 benpatt

benpatt

    Poker Forum Newbie

  • Members
  • 60 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:michigan state
  • Interests:soccer, poker, chess, backgammon

Posted 24 April 2007 - 10:30 AM

Alright guys kinda boring but just looking for a bit of advice, I took some time off, about a month and a half and I was playing just a ton of multis had a few wins nothing huge but now i am looking for something new, I just threw 110 on stars and tried out playing 6 11 dollar sngs just to see if I thought i could make it work. I ended up 51 dollars after all 6 were complete, If i am going to start multi tabling sngs like this what sort of return can i realistically look for?(this first round seems a bit high) What is a good amount of buy ins to keep in my account? And does anyone know some good articles on sit and goes becuase i have been a mtt man for my whole career. thanks

#2 SilentButDeadly3

SilentButDeadly3

    Hatas hate, Playas play

  • Members
  • 2,122 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Ames
  • Interests:Favorite Games are<br />1.. NLHE<br />2. PLO<br />3. 7stud
  • Favorite Poker Game:Unlimited Hold Them, PLO or Reverse Hold Em

Posted 24 April 2007 - 10:46 AM

lol bragpostamentsAn ROI higher than 20-25% should be goot if you're multi tabling. You should keep at least 20 buyins but I prefer more conservative and lean toward 40-50. I know many people who have gone bust by the "standard 20 buyin rule" without playing bad. GL, the SNG grind can get tiresome.

#3 cubsfan44

cubsfan44

    Poker Winnings? Whats that?

  • Members
  • 7,034 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Chicago
  • Favorite Poker Game:The Cadillac

Posted 24 April 2007 - 10:48 AM

View PostSilentButDeadly3, on Tuesday, April 24th, 2007, 10:46 AM, said:

lol bragpostamentsAn ROI higher than 20-25% should be goot if you're multi tabling. You should keep at least 20 buyins but I prefer more conservative and lean toward 40-50. I know many people who have gone bust by the "standard 20 buyin rule" without playing bad. GL, the SNG grind can get tiresome.
QFT sng play is very streaky
What if the 'HOKEY POKEY' really IS what it's ALL about?

#4 timwakefield

timwakefield

    He fixes radios by thinking!

  • Members
  • 14,074 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Boston

Posted 24 April 2007 - 10:55 AM

I agree, the more buy-ins the better. 35%ish is definitely achievable at the lower level sngs ($5-$20).
Maury Wills once told me that there will come a point in my career when everyone in the ballpark will know that I have to steal a base, and I will steal that base. - Dave Roberts

#5 potatoman

potatoman

    Poker Forum Groupie

  • Members
  • 954 posts

Posted 24 April 2007 - 11:32 AM

I play extremely conservative when it comes to bankrolling sngs. I play with a min. 65 buyins for the level I'm playing at. I do this so that any streak of cold deck/bad luck/and resulting bad play on my part will not have much affect on me emotionally (helps me avoid tilt). It also means I should never go broke. (I've been playing for about 1.5 years and have never come close).I usually play in units of 10, (1-3 at a time), before I'll take a break to go over my results and try to concentrate on any leaks in my game (am I playing too loose, too tight?).Once I finish 100 sngs. I stop and calculate my ROI and my percentage of in the money finishes.I aim for a min. of 50 percent ITM and a ROI of at least 18-20 per cent. I can get ROI up as high as 35 percent and ITM of about 60 per cent. But these figures are at a very low buyin (usually $1-2).I would expect if you are playing at $10-$20, your results maybe slightly lower, depending on your sng experience and the level of play by your opponents.Six sngs is not enough of a sample to know how much success you may have in sngs. I would go for about 200-300.As mentioned eariler, sngs are a grind for some people, more so than cash games. I find my game is best suited to sngs, since I have a tendency to go on tilt in cash games. I actually find the swings to be very small playing sngs.My worst showing in the last four months was going 1/10 with a third place finish. This or something similar will happen to everyone. You will get sucked out on in 80/20 situations, 60/40 situations and have your two pair/str8 run into a rivered flush/ full house at the worst possible moment.I've also gone 7/10 with 6 first place finishes. My avg currently is probably something like 6/10 with a first, three seconds and two thirds.My avg bad run is 4/10 with two seconds and two thirds, which usually means a small lose.The downside of sngs is that when you do run bad, you'll feel like you wasted a lot of time with very little money gained. Money you probably feel you could have won from the donks you're playing if you were all sitting at a cash game. Your actual cash game can suffer a bit too, since sngs and cash game strategy differ a bit.The upside, for me, is a stable ROI with little swing and I find when I do treat myself to a tournament, I play well, especially at the final table or in short handed situations.

#6 KentuckySlim

KentuckySlim

    Poker Forum Groupie

  • Members
  • 535 posts
  • Favorite Poker Game:Omaha 8 or better

Posted 24 April 2007 - 11:52 AM

View Postbenpatt, on Tuesday, April 24th, 2007, 2:30 PM, said:

Alright guys kinda boring but just looking for a bit of advice, I took some time off, about a month and a half and I was playing just a ton of multis had a few wins nothing huge but now i am looking for something new, I just threw 110 on stars and tried out playing 6 11 dollar sngs just to see if I thought i could make it work. I ended up 51 dollars after all 6 were complete, If i am going to start multi tabling sngs like this what sort of return can i realistically look for?(this first round seems a bit high) What is a good amount of buy ins to keep in my account? And does anyone know some good articles on sit and goes becuase i have been a mtt man for my whole career. thanks
Good luck. I'd rather shoot myself in the face than try to grind it out using sit n gos again...
KYSlim05: if i don't final table this donkament i'm gonna be a little disappointed
by&celuchips: that coming from the head donk




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users