Full Tilt Poker
No Limit Holdem Tournament
Blinds: t20/t40
8 players
Converter
Stack sizes:
UTG: t1320
UTG+1: t1155
MP1: t1515
MP2: t1920
CO: t2920
Button: t690
SB: t2225
Hero: t1755
Pre-flop: (8 players) Hero is BB with J♥ 6♥
UTG folds, UTG+1 calls t40 (pot was t60), 2 folds, CO calls t40 (pot was t100), Button folds, SB calls t20 (pot was t140), Hero checks.
Flop: A♣ 2♦ J♦ (t160, 4 players)
SB checks, Hero checks, UTG+1 checks, CO checks.
Turn: 5♥ (t160, 4 players)
SB checks, Hero checks, UTG+1 checks, CO bets t160, SB folds, Hero calls t160 (pot was t320), UTG+1 folds.
River: T♦ (t480, 2 players)
Hero checks, CO bets t480, Hero?
I was thinking of maybe leading 1/2 pot on river but decided to give it up. Anyone give it up on turn? Players to my left have generally been tight, and the lags are on the right. CO among the aggressive ones. First hand he picked up huge pot with Q8 top pair, against two of the other lags on my right both one overplaying bottom pair and one overplaying 2nd pair. Still early, but it looks like that's how the table's going down so far. No deep reads.
Ftp $2 Sng 2nd Pair/bad Kicker
Started by ramenandeggs, Apr 19 2007 03:18 PM
6 replies to this topic
#1
Posted 19 April 2007 - 03:18 PM
#2
Posted 19 April 2007 - 03:39 PM
I think you have to fold or raise on turn, and given your weak kicker with the 2nd pair, I'd fold.
AKProdigy
Toronto, Canada
Toronto, Canada
#3
Posted 19 April 2007 - 03:47 PM
I check/fold this with 3 villains going to the flop unless I get two-pair (or better) and a flush draw. Your kicker is terrible, there's very little in the pot, nd you're not going to get play from any worse hands.
#4
Posted 19 April 2007 - 03:56 PM
I don't understand your play at all here. You check the flop and then check-call a pot-sized bet on the turn with a card that didn't improve your hand at all? As you played it, fold the turn. But I might have thrown out a bet on the flop to test the waters and folded if someone played back at me.
“Integrity is doing the right thing, even if nobody is watching." - Anonymous
#5
Posted 19 April 2007 - 04:19 PM
QUOTE (jmbreslin @ Thursday, April 19th, 2007, 4:56 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
I don't understand your play at all here. You check the flop and then check-call a pot-sized bet on the turn with a card that didn't improve your hand at all? As you played it, fold the turn. But I might have thrown out a bet on the flop to test the waters and folded if someone played back at me.
your approach loses the same chips as mine. I don't see a five helping many hands here that play it like this except maybe 55. But when I play a weak hand hard on the flop, I lose chances to draw out relatively cheap, and in many cases I go into the turn with an inflated pot. What if a flush draw check-calls or even uses the infamous check-shove? I'll just be throwing chips into a pot that I'm willing to fold to hands that are behind mine. Am I going to put him on a flush draw, a better J or a raggedy A? It won't matter right? I'm mucking it regardless.
A 5 or any other noncoordinating cards here, actually improves my hand if I'm already ahead and makes little difference if I'm already behind.
That's why I don't see checking the flop a horrible thing to do, and if leading the flop was viable, I definitely don't see a problem in check-calling the turn. Everyone's saying I fold river yes? I'm thinking that means I got just as much information as a flop lead.
#6
Posted 19 April 2007 - 04:45 PM
QUOTE (ramenandeggs @ Thursday, April 19th, 2007, 8:19 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
your approach loses the same chips as mine. I don't see a five helping many hands here that play it like this except maybe 55. But when I play a weak hand hard on the flop, I lose chances to draw out relatively cheap, and in many cases I go into the turn with an inflated pot. What if a flush draw check-calls or even uses the infamous check-shove? I'll just be throwing chips into a pot that I'm willing to fold to hands that are behind mine. Am I going to put him on a flush draw, a better J or a raggedy A? It won't matter right? I'm mucking it regardless.
A 5 or any other noncoordinating cards here, actually improves my hand if I'm already ahead and makes little difference if I'm already behind.
That's why I don't see checking the flop a horrible thing to do, and if leading the flop was viable, I definitely don't see a problem in check-calling the turn. Everyone's saying I fold river yes? I'm thinking that means I got just as much information as a flop lead.
A 5 or any other noncoordinating cards here, actually improves my hand if I'm already ahead and makes little difference if I'm already behind.
That's why I don't see checking the flop a horrible thing to do, and if leading the flop was viable, I definitely don't see a problem in check-calling the turn. Everyone's saying I fold river yes? I'm thinking that means I got just as much information as a flop lead.
Youve gotten as much information as a flop lead, but youve given away far more information than a flop lead would. If Im folding this river, its because I decided earlier that he has an A, so I wouldnt have called the turn bet either.
___________
Wave upon wave of Demented Avengers march cheerfully out of obscurity into the dream.
Wave upon wave of Demented Avengers march cheerfully out of obscurity into the dream.
#7
Posted 19 April 2007 - 04:57 PM
I give this one up. Too many times A/rag plays this hand exactly like it's being played, as does a flush draw.
But making a pot sized bet on the flop or turn >>>>>>>> calling a pot sized bet on the turn.
But making a pot sized bet on the flop or turn >>>>>>>> calling a pot sized bet on the turn.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users









