Vt Gunman Cho Seung-hui ----- Not A Bad Guy At All
#1
Posted 17 April 2007 - 09:12 PM
I think we need to show some love for Cho Seung-Hui.
#2
Posted 17 April 2007 - 09:15 PM
I think we need to show some love for Cho Seung-Hui.
You're why people hate "Liberals."
#4
Posted 17 April 2007 - 09:25 PM
I think we need to show some love for Cho Seung-Hui.
I used to be a lonely guy, but it didn't lead me to kill 33 people.
The money did.
#5
Posted 17 April 2007 - 09:28 PM
Come on, seriously. You don't get sad looking at Cho's face in those photos. He looks so lonely; he looks like he's about to cry. Too bad I wasn't around, I would have tried to be his buddy.
He just needed a buddy
#6
Posted 17 April 2007 - 09:36 PM
That pretty much sums it up.
#7
Posted 17 April 2007 - 09:36 PM
Regular poor lonely guys jump off bridges or shoot themselves. This poor lonely guy chained door exits so people would be trapped inside, and killed some while having them face the wall execution-style. This ******* was cold-blooded.
#8
Posted 17 April 2007 - 09:40 PM
+1

INTERNATIONAL SUPERSTAR
#9
Posted 17 April 2007 - 09:42 PM
#10
Posted 17 April 2007 - 10:36 PM
#11
Posted 17 April 2007 - 10:41 PM
#12
Posted 17 April 2007 - 10:44 PM

for great rakeback paid daily at RakeUpdate, click here !
for great rakeback paid monthly at RaketheRake, please refer to member RTR20401
#13
Posted 17 April 2007 - 11:19 PM
#14
Posted 17 April 2007 - 11:29 PM
well of course i feel much worse for the victims, but that doesn't stop me from feeling bad for the shooter. he's obviously the victim himself in some way. you live with a deranged mind for awhile and tell me how much fun it is. life for this poor guy really sucked. figurative demons invaded his mind.
#15
Posted 17 April 2007 - 11:32 PM
...and global warming informer.
"If people are good only because they fear punishment, and hope for a reward, then we are a sorry lot indeed." - Albert Einstein
"Religion is regarded by the common people as true, by the wise as false, and by the rulers as useful." - Lucius Annaeus Seneca
"If a man is offered a fact which goes against his instincts, he will scrutinize it closely, and unless the
evidence is overwhelming, he will refuse to believe it. If, on the other hand, he is offered something
which affords a reason for acting in accordance to his instincts, he will accept it even on the slightest
evidence. The origin of myths is explained in this way." - Bertrand Russell
#16
Posted 17 April 2007 - 11:34 PM
Not all of us are Christians.
#17
Posted 17 April 2007 - 11:36 PM
#18
Posted 17 April 2007 - 11:41 PM
WOOT? There is hope?
...and global warming informer.
"If people are good only because they fear punishment, and hope for a reward, then we are a sorry lot indeed." - Albert Einstein
"Religion is regarded by the common people as true, by the wise as false, and by the rulers as useful." - Lucius Annaeus Seneca
"If a man is offered a fact which goes against his instincts, he will scrutinize it closely, and unless the
evidence is overwhelming, he will refuse to believe it. If, on the other hand, he is offered something
which affords a reason for acting in accordance to his instincts, he will accept it even on the slightest
evidence. The origin of myths is explained in this way." - Bertrand Russell
#19
Posted 18 April 2007 - 01:36 AM
Not as much as you think.
Christians have no problem throwing nooses around issues they feel are unjust. Not very "Jesusy", but meh... what is?
People come to Washington believing it is the center of power. It was only much later that I learned that Washington is a steering wheel that's not connected to an engine.
I look at the Senators and pray for this country.
It may be true that you can't fool all the people all the time, but you can fool enough of them to rule a large country.
#20
Posted 18 April 2007 - 04:24 AM
I disagree with Bill, for once. I don't think he was a loser. I think, from what little I could gather from his plays and from what people said about him, that he was simply, grade A, old school crazy. He had a horrible case of Antisocial Personality Disorder (the technical term, no the layman usage). He didn't need friends, he needed to be in a mental institution. Honestly, he did.
It was impossible to reach out to him. People tried. Apparently he would just stare blankly and not respond to other people.
He in some way seems different from, say, the Columbine shooters. They had friends (each other). People didn't really think that they were the type to be school shooters. They were odd, for sure, but the extent to which they were deeply troubled was largly undetectable. With this guy, people knew right away after meeting him that he had serious problems.
It's not like "too many people picked on him at school" or "he hated the snobby, popular kids" or whatever the cliches are. I mean, I'm sure all those things were true for him, but in reality his sickness was much deeper than those simple, superficial causes. He was just really, really mentally ill.
That's my opinion, at least.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users










