gooner007 0 Posted April 14, 2007 Share Posted April 14, 2007 Daniel you say in your blog Hustled for the Very last time 9th Aprl you writeNow, to be fair, I've only heard one side of the story, but it seems like the evidence is overwhelmingly compelling in favor of my friend. As Doyle Brunson put it, "-------, did you put a gun to their head and force them to keep playing?"But in your blog Moving Day Aprl 10th As for my last blog, and my reasoning behind it, I felt as though the portrayal of my friend through other blogs and hearsay was completely unfair. Much had been said and/or written about the incident, and I felt like only one side of the story was made public. Had the other side of the story not been made public first, I never in a million years would have discussed a private matter in my blog. However, once it was already written about in other posts and blogs, it ceased to be a private matter.So make your mind up will you !!!! You shouldn't have got involved in the first place Link to post Share on other sites
Canuckickstan 2 Posted April 14, 2007 Share Posted April 14, 2007 Last week called, they want their drama back. Link to post Share on other sites
Oziumrules 0 Posted April 14, 2007 Share Posted April 14, 2007 Daniel you say in your blog Hustled for the Very last time 9th Aprl you wrteNow, to be fair, I've only heard one side of the story, but it seems like the evidence is overwhelmingly compelling in favor of my friend. As Doyle Brunson put it, "-------, did you put a gun to their head and force them to keep playing?"But in your blog Moving Day Aprl 10th As for my last blog, and my reasoning behind it, I felt as though the portrayal of my friend through other blogs and hearsay was completely unfair. Much had been said and/or written about the incident, and I felt like only one side of the story was made public. Had the other side of the story not been made public first, I never in a million years would have discussed a private matter in my blog. However, once it was already written about in other posts and blogs, it ceased to be a private matter.So make your mind up wll you !!!! You shouldn't have got involved n the fisrt placeSomeone is late for 5th period grammar....Hurry up or you'll get detention. Link to post Share on other sites
gooner007 0 Posted April 14, 2007 Author Share Posted April 14, 2007 Last week called, they want their drama back.Muppet, you're hardly Danel Link to post Share on other sites
gooner007 0 Posted April 14, 2007 Author Share Posted April 14, 2007 Someone is late for 5th period grammar....Hurry up or you'll get detention.Another muppet up Daniel's ring piece Link to post Share on other sites
showstopper24 0 Posted April 14, 2007 Share Posted April 14, 2007 Last week called, they want their drama back.lol Link to post Share on other sites
fighter 4 Posted April 14, 2007 Share Posted April 14, 2007 Last week called, they want their drama back.Best call Link to post Share on other sites
chrozzo 19 Posted April 14, 2007 Share Posted April 14, 2007 I'm Jim Henson, and I created the MUPPETS....WOOOOT!!! Link to post Share on other sites
gooner007 0 Posted April 14, 2007 Author Share Posted April 14, 2007 I'm Jim Henson, and I created the MUPPETS....WOOOOT!!!you are all numpty's, work that fecker out. Link to post Share on other sites
chrozzo 19 Posted April 14, 2007 Share Posted April 14, 2007 you are all numpty's, work that fecker out.i think i'm gonna need some help here...ok...im a numpty....and I have to work a fecker out....hmmmm.... Link to post Share on other sites
Exeunt 0 Posted April 15, 2007 Share Posted April 15, 2007 i think i'm gonna need some help here...ok...im a numpty....and I have to work a fecker out....hmmmm....lmao Link to post Share on other sites
Donkey Destroyer 0 Posted April 15, 2007 Share Posted April 15, 2007 Last week called, they want their drama back.nh sir Link to post Share on other sites
Balloon guy 158 Posted April 15, 2007 Share Posted April 15, 2007 Daniel you say in your blog Hustled for the Very last time 9th Aprl you writeNow, to be fair, I've only heard one side of the story, but it seems like the evidence is overwhelmingly compelling in favor of my friend. As Doyle Brunson put it, "-------, did you put a gun to their head and force them to keep playing?"But in your blog Moving Day Aprl 10th As for my last blog, and my reasoning behind it, I felt as though the portrayal of my friend through other blogs and hearsay was completely unfair. Much had been said and/or written about the incident, and I felt like only one side of the story was made public. Had the other side of the story not been made public first, I never in a million years would have discussed a private matter in my blog. However, once it was already written about in other posts and blogs, it ceased to be a private matter.So make your mind up will you !!!! You shouldn't have got involved in the first placeYou think it's possible that Daniel talking to Ivey is a little more likely to get the whole side of his story then reading something someone wrote on the intraweb would give him to know the other's side? Just a little? Link to post Share on other sites
Oziumrules 0 Posted April 15, 2007 Share Posted April 15, 2007 Another muppet up Daniel's ring pieceThis muppet got you to fix the spelling errors in your original post though! Link to post Share on other sites
thebottomline 0 Posted April 15, 2007 Share Posted April 15, 2007 i think i'm gonna need some help here...ok...im a numpty....and I have to work a fecker out....hmmmm....Numpty is an English idiom (as far as I know) for a fool. Fecker is a way of saying f*cker...I understand the words, but I'm at a loss too.. Link to post Share on other sites
Oziumrules 0 Posted April 15, 2007 Share Posted April 15, 2007 Brilliant! Link to post Share on other sites
chrozzo 19 Posted April 15, 2007 Share Posted April 15, 2007 Brilliant!VERY Link to post Share on other sites
AKoffsuit 0 Posted April 15, 2007 Share Posted April 15, 2007 VERY+1 Link to post Share on other sites
fighter 4 Posted April 15, 2007 Share Posted April 15, 2007 What newspaper this printed in very nicely done Link to post Share on other sites
knoxxxy 0 Posted April 18, 2007 Share Posted April 18, 2007 thats a fairly dumb thread.....there was no lies...and his statements are NOT contradictory if u are intelligent enough to see Link to post Share on other sites
fatshaft 0 Posted April 19, 2007 Share Posted April 19, 2007 You think it's possible that Daniel talking to Ivey is a little more likely to get the whole side of his story then reading something someone wrote on the intraweb would give him to know the other's side? Just a little?As Marc Goodwin posted his side when this story first surfaced, and now Ram has done the same after meeting in April to decide what would happen to the "debt/fraudulently acquired winnings" as they always said they would. We have no first hand account from Ivey or the other player, only second hand gossip from DN.I would take the written word of the two defrauded golfers over gossip every time. Link to post Share on other sites
Balloon guy 158 Posted April 19, 2007 Share Posted April 19, 2007 I would take the written word of the two defrauded golfers over gossip every time.Who's word would you take over 2 defrauded golfers vs a pair of drunkards with a perchance for colorful limericks? Link to post Share on other sites
LucyLastik 0 Posted April 20, 2007 Share Posted April 20, 2007 Who's word would you take over 2 defrauded golfers vs a pair of drunkards with a perchance for colorful limericks?Would you have a penchant for using words you don't understand, perchance? Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now