Sefaje, on Friday, April 13th, 2007, 4:04 PM, said:
Was This Standard?
Started by shrimp4789, Apr 12 2007 10:29 AM
57 replies to this topic
#41
Posted 13 April 2007 - 12:19 PM
this thread is the twilight zone. seriouslyand zach/acid/other grammar Kings --- i am proof that it's possible to post well without correct punctualization/capitalization. the key is to not spell a bunch of stuff wrong and use lots of small paragraphs.
QUOTE (serge @ Tuesday, May 12th, 2009, 7:20 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
LETS GO PITTSBURGH
QUOTE (Acid_Knight @ Monday, March 10th, 2008, 4:15 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Zach is right about pretty much everything.
#42
Posted 13 April 2007 - 12:35 PM
Zach6668, on Friday, April 13th, 2007, 1:19 PM, said:
I think small punctuation/capitalization errors/omissions can certainly be ignore if you give solid posts. Good posts don't make you look 14. When people who can't even type their own name properly reply, AND give awful advice, then it's relentlessly annoying.
#43
Posted 13 April 2007 - 12:57 PM
Zach6668, on Friday, April 13th, 2007, 1:19 PM, said:
... can certainly be ignored ...
#44
Posted 13 April 2007 - 12:59 PM
I just wanted to point out that the ability to edit my posts, AND everyone elses has huge advantages when covering up your own flaws.That is all.
QUOTE (serge @ Tuesday, May 12th, 2009, 7:20 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
LETS GO PITTSBURGH
QUOTE (Acid_Knight @ Monday, March 10th, 2008, 4:15 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Zach is right about pretty much everything.
#45
Posted 13 April 2007 - 01:05 PM
Your all overreacting hear.
Peace,
Jay

Jay

#49
#54
Posted 13 April 2007 - 03:24 PM
Lock it up.
QUOTE (serge @ Tuesday, May 12th, 2009, 7:20 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
LETS GO PITTSBURGH
QUOTE (Acid_Knight @ Monday, March 10th, 2008, 4:15 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Zach is right about pretty much everything.
#56
Posted 13 April 2007 - 06:46 PM
damnit people stop hijacking my thread!!!!
#57
Posted 13 April 2007 - 07:56 PM
shrimp4789, on Friday, April 13th, 2007, 1:13 PM, said:
true enough, i was esentially trying to make villian lay down a hand that could possibly beat me, but of course i didnt know EXACTLY what he had. so in what situations do you try and make someone lay down a hand that currently has you beat on a dangerous board?If you were vilian, would you have called my raise on turn with ducks? like was it a stupid move on his part as well as mine, or was i the lonely idiot in this hand?
QUOTE (CozMyn @ Sunday, March 8th, 2009, 5:54 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
i tried to talk here about that program, the RNG , not to talk about when to accept all in without to see flop.
You can accept all in whenever you want, or whenever you feel lucky, but in virtual room's is not like in reality. In reality anything is possible... in virtual rooms you can be "the one" who knows the future, or who can change the future.
You can accept all in whenever you want, or whenever you feel lucky, but in virtual room's is not like in reality. In reality anything is possible... in virtual rooms you can be "the one" who knows the future, or who can change the future.
#58
Posted 14 April 2007 - 04:03 PM
when bluffing it's also good to think about what hand you're pretending to have. You raise, he calls and leads out on a j high board. You flat call. To me, this means you don't have aj, you'd probably raise. Can't really say qq kk, you'd probably raise, even AA but maybe you're trapping. So you have jjj or air most likely.Now the turn hits: JSo, he bets and now you raise?? What hand does that make sense with? You waited till you're beat by trips to raise your overpair or you just raised quads for no reason.Your line doesn't make sense. He's a donk too. But again, try and figure out when a bluff makes sense.
Now working and pokering. It's like two incomes in one.
UFC July 4th weekend. Vegas!
UFC July 4th weekend. Vegas!
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users









