chgocubs99 0 Posted March 28, 2007 Share Posted March 28, 2007 Blinds - $2/5. I have about $900 in front of me when the following hand comes up:I pick up 6-7 of spades on the cutoff seat. Hypo-aggro in LP makes it $20 after 2 limpers. I call the $20. Button goes all in for $46 total. Both limpers call as does the LP aggro. I call the additional $26 and we see a flop.8 6 3 with two spades.EP bets $150. New player but is agressive and is clearly a regular. He has $700 or so behind. Hypo-aggro in LP calls the $150. He has around $700 behind as well.What do I do?? Link to post Share on other sites
Naismith 0 Posted March 28, 2007 Share Posted March 28, 2007 Shove.Succinct.Also, agreed. Link to post Share on other sites
krup24 0 Posted March 28, 2007 Share Posted March 28, 2007 Shove.and pray you don't get a call from another flush draw or set Link to post Share on other sites
mtdesmoines 2 Posted March 28, 2007 Share Posted March 28, 2007 Succinct.Also, agreed.I'm not sure I agree. We're working a $300 pot with a +/-$750 stack and second pair, flush draw on a low board. Too many hands here utterly kill us here to give LAGs our money. They'll certainly give us better spots. Link to post Share on other sites
No_Neck 0 Posted March 28, 2007 Share Posted March 28, 2007 I'm not sure I agree. We're working a $300 pot with a +/-$750 stack and second pair, flush draw on a low board. Too many hands here utterly kill us here to give LAGs our money. They'll certainly give us better spots.so you say call?gamboooooollllll Link to post Share on other sites
Acid_Knight 2 Posted March 28, 2007 Share Posted March 28, 2007 Unless there are compelling reasons to say otherwise, I've stopped advising people to fold pairs and flush draws. It's just easier that way. Link to post Share on other sites
mtdesmoines 2 Posted March 28, 2007 Share Posted March 28, 2007 Unless there are compelling reasons to say otherwise, I've stopped advising people to fold pairs and flush draws. It's just easier that way.My bad. Sometimes I forget which team I'm on. Link to post Share on other sites
myenemy 0 Posted March 28, 2007 Share Posted March 28, 2007 Unless there are compelling reasons to say otherwise, I've stopped advising people to fold pairs and flush draws. It's just easier that way.HAHA.. I'll bite. I fold.Even though it is $150 into a $530 pot, there is too much evidence suggesting either a set or better FD (or worse both!!), BCS we're vs. an overpair. I can certainly get my money in better than that. Link to post Share on other sites
rdtedm 0 Posted March 28, 2007 Share Posted March 28, 2007 HAHA.. I'll bite. I fold.Even though it is $150 into a $530 pot, there is too much evidence suggesting either a set or better FD (or worse both!!), BCS we're vs. an overpair. I can certainly get my money in better than that.Folding here is too weak. I think shoving is the only right move, because calling lets other people draw to the flush when they most likely don't have a pair that beats ours. If we can get our money in and get one person to fold, even if we're against an overpair, we're drawing to 9 outs for the flush, 2 for trips, and 3 for two pair, and possibly running straight cards. This gives us 14 outs with two cards to come assuming villain has an overpair. If he has a set or two pair, we've still got outs.I want to emphasize that this is never a fold given the odds, at the very least this is a call and re-evaluation on the turn. Link to post Share on other sites
Acid_Knight 2 Posted March 28, 2007 Share Posted March 28, 2007 Even though it is $150 into a $530 pot, there is too much evidence suggesting either a set or better FD (or worse both!!), BCS we're vs. an overpair. I can certainly get my money in better than that.Where is this evidence. There is a bet and a call on the flop, that's it. You shouldn't be looking for excuses to call or excuses to fold, you should be looking at the information objectively and trying to decide what it's telling you. I don't really see any evidence in this hand that gives away much about the hands of either villain. Since we don't have much information and we have a fairly strong hand then we shouldn't be folding. Link to post Share on other sites
Naismith 0 Posted March 28, 2007 Share Posted March 28, 2007 Yeah, I think saying there's obviously a set and a flush draw is seeing monsters. Of course, there might be, but there's certainly no evidence to say definitively.I push because I want the 300 dollars in the side pot and I want to go against the all in with a hand that's in really good shape against his range for that last 200 bucks. If someone calls me with a set, well, that sucks for them. Sorry about your luck, Mr. Set. In any case, a push here represents some serious strength and folds a lot of hands that beat what we have. Link to post Share on other sites
Acid_Knight 2 Posted March 28, 2007 Share Posted March 28, 2007 Sorry about your luck, Mr. Set.What's that, a set of 8s? It's ok, I've got outs.Turn: 6River 6See Link to post Share on other sites
Naismith 0 Posted March 28, 2007 Share Posted March 28, 2007 What's that, a set of 8s? It's ok, I've got outs.Turn: 6River 6See That's how you win with style. Link to post Share on other sites
Zach6668 513 Posted March 28, 2007 Share Posted March 28, 2007 If you were to get it all in (or shove and have him fold) with middle pair and a flush draw 100% of the time, you'd come out ahead. Link to post Share on other sites
chgocubs99 0 Posted March 29, 2007 Author Share Posted March 29, 2007 Folding here is too weak. I think shoving is the only right move, because calling lets other people draw to the flush when they most likely don't have a pair that beats ours. If we can get our money in and get one person to fold, even if we're against an overpair, we're drawing to 9 outs for the flush, 2 for trips, and 3 for two pair, and possibly running straight cards. This gives us 14 outs with two cards to come assuming villain has an overpair. If he has a set or two pair, we've still got outs.I want to emphasize that this is never a fold given the odds, at the very least this is a call and re-evaluation on the turn.I agree with this post.I folded the hand.Part of the problem with the way I played the hand was not using the information I had gathered, most importantly that I was playing against two very LAG players. That being said, let's eliminate my admittidely weak play (folding) and look at my other two options:1) Call. My problem here is, what am I looking to hit on the turn? Let's say a blank falls. The guy who fired $150 now shoves. What's my play now? I was assuming (incorrectly so) that he would fire on the turn after the strong flop bet. Odds of me hitting with one card to come only? I am not getting the right odds...not to mention I HAD to consider the possibility that someone had higher spades as well, which would then stack me considering the size of the pot.2) Shove. This, I am fairly certain, is the correct play considering the players and the situation. It is for the exact reason that Zach said.As someone posted about picking a better spot, I did get it all in with one of the LAG's in a "better spot" later in the session. However, the ends do not justify the means. Link to post Share on other sites
Naismith 0 Posted March 29, 2007 Share Posted March 29, 2007 I agree with this post.I folded the hand.Part of the problem with the way I played the hand was not using the information I had gathered, most importantly that I was playing against two very LAG players. That being said, let's eliminate my admittidely weak play (folding) and look at my other two options:1) Call. My problem here is, what am I looking to hit on the turn? Let's say a blank falls. The guy who fired $150 now shoves. What's my play now? I was assuming (incorrectly so) that he would fire on the turn after the strong flop bet. Odds of me hitting with one card to come only? I am not getting the right odds...not to mention I HAD to consider the possibility that someone had higher spades as well, which would then stack me considering the size of the pot.2) Shove. This, I am fairly certain, is the correct play considering the players and the situation. It is for the exact reason that Zach said.As someone posted about picking a better spot, I did get it all in with one of the LAG's in a "better spot" later in the session. However, the ends do not justify the means.Could you please post the hands of the players involved? Link to post Share on other sites
mtdesmoines 2 Posted March 29, 2007 Share Posted March 29, 2007 Could you please post the hands of the players involved?I think hero posted that his hand was mucked. I really didn't like the advice of pushing with this hand. We are connected to this flop, but it's likely we're behind. I like that the hero waited for his spot and got his man. Better than having to reshoot, rebuild and hope villain still has checks. Link to post Share on other sites
No_Neck 0 Posted March 29, 2007 Share Posted March 29, 2007 how did this hand end? we must know. Link to post Share on other sites
Acid_Knight 2 Posted March 29, 2007 Share Posted March 29, 2007 It seems to be a common trend in this forum lately that whenever anyone posts a hand where they flop a pair and a flush draw with a suited connector (like, oh, this post for example) and there are 2 other people who are obviously interested in the pot, then the Hero (and many other posters) always want to assume the worst, which is that you're against a set and a bigger flush draw. It's as if no other possibilities exist.When you play these hands, you're going to be in multiway pots. Quite often, several people will hit the flop. Sometimes they have sets, sometimes they have flush draws, overpairs, 2 pair, straight draws or other hands. Unless the action is VERY DEFINITIVE in the hand and there's a lot of evidence (that you can rationalize) pointing towards both your pair and your draw being totally dead, then you shouldn't be considering folding these hands.Yes, you make a big mistake if you push and you ARE against a pair and a flush draw, but when you're against 2 overpairs and are a HUGE money favorite in the pot, you're making a similarly large mistake in folding. Link to post Share on other sites
Naismith 0 Posted March 29, 2007 Share Posted March 29, 2007 I think hero posted that his hand was mucked. I really didn't like the advice of pushing with this hand. We are connected to this flop, but it's likely we're behind. I like that the hero waited for his spot and got his man. Better than having to reshoot, rebuild and hope villain still has checks.Yeah, he mucked, but there was an all in, so some cards had to be shown down. :)I really just want to know the cards because of all this "obviously a set and bigger flush draw" talk. I obviously agree with your second line, but you have to remember that many, many, many hands we beat fold to our push and we get to freeroll against the all in for the remaining pot. Link to post Share on other sites
mtdesmoines 2 Posted March 29, 2007 Share Posted March 29, 2007 Yeah, he mucked, but there was an all in, so some cards had to be shown down. :)I really just want to know the cards because of all this "obviously a set and bigger flush draw" talk. I obviously agree with your second line, but you have to remember that many, many, many hands we beat fold to our push and we get to freeroll against the all in for the remaining pot.I'm not a big fan of squeezing. I trap squeezers at least once per session. Link to post Share on other sites
chgocubs99 0 Posted March 30, 2007 Author Share Posted March 30, 2007 how did this hand end? we must know.The guy who bet the flop bet another $200 or so on the turn. The player with chips left folded. The all in player had AA and won the main pot. The other player showed JJ and won a side pot. I don't know what the other player could have possibly had to call that amount on the flop and fold to a $200 bet on the turn. Apparently he made a WSOP final table and had some money to burn. I happily helped him with this problem later in the evening.Oh yea, the turn was a 5 and the river was a 9...which, honestly, is probably why I posted this hand in the first place. But it was interesting either way. Link to post Share on other sites
Acid_Knight 2 Posted March 30, 2007 Share Posted March 30, 2007 Yes, you make a big mistake if you push and you ARE against a pair and a flush draw, but when you're against 2 overpairs and are a HUGE money favorite in the pot, you're making a similarly large mistake in folding. *pats self on back* Link to post Share on other sites
mtdesmoines 2 Posted March 30, 2007 Share Posted March 30, 2007 The guy who bet the flop bet another $200 or so on the turn. The player with chips left folded. The all in player had AA and won the main pot. The other player showed JJ and won a side pot. I don't know what the other player could have possibly had to call that amount on the flop and fold to a $200 bet on the turn. Apparently he made a WSOP final table and had some money to burn. I happily helped him with this problem later in the evening.Oh yea, the turn was a 5 and the river was a 9...which, honestly, is probably why I posted this hand in the first place. But it was interesting either way.So what. Good fold 90% of the time. Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now