Aa 1/2 Nl
#1
Posted 22 March 2007 - 02:35 PM
The guy who raises here, my buddy described as an "uber aggressive post flop player".
Seat 1: Daywalker82 ($240.65 in chips)
Seat 2: horryclutch ($804.10 in chips)
Seat 3: HERO ($150.25 in chips)
Seat 4: baldoon ($45.85 in chips)
Seat 5: adam001 ($321 in chips)
Seat 6: SunTzuReps ($263 in chips)
SunTzuReps: posts small blind $1
Daywalker82: posts big blind $2
*** HOLE CARDS ***
Dealt to HERO [Ah Ac]
horryclutch: raises $4 to $6
HERO: calls $6
baldoon: folds
adam001: folds
SunTzuReps: folds
Daywalker82: calls $4
*** FLOP *** [Qd 7d Tc]
Daywalker82: checks
horryclutch: bets $10
HERO: calls $10
Daywalker82: calls $10
*** TURN *** [Qd 7d Tc] [7c]
Daywalker82: checks
horryclutch: checks
HERO: bets $20
Daywalker82: folds
horryclutch: calls $20
*** RIVER *** [Qd 7d Tc 7c] [8s]
horryclutch: checks
HERO: bets $30
Jay

#2
Posted 22 March 2007 - 02:55 PM
#3
Posted 22 March 2007 - 02:56 PM
As he played it I think you need to either A) raise the flop, or B ) bet more on the turn/river.
#4
Posted 22 March 2007 - 02:56 PM
He needs to show some aggression though. This flop is pretty bad for his hand. His turn bet isn't even 1/2 the pot, which is wayyyy too small. I'd bet about $40-50 here with 1092812 straight draws and 2 flush draws.
#5
Posted 22 March 2007 - 04:25 PM
I agree.
I've had some really bad luck lately slow playing big hands. I can understand the logic of playing this to attract action, but it just gets you into trouble too often, especially with 4 players behind you yet to play.
I'm hungry!
#6
Posted 22 March 2007 - 04:41 PM
Too many draws out there to slowplay it like that on the flop. Espeically since 3 people went to flop, not two.
Bet more on the turn to make those draws play.
No flush hit on river so that is a good card. Villian probably has JJ or busted draw.
#8
Posted 22 March 2007 - 05:12 PM
#9
Posted 22 March 2007 - 05:31 PM
LOL. No, when I have aces, I go for the limp-raise play and then open-muck the flop.
Jay

#10
Posted 22 March 2007 - 05:39 PM
#11
Posted 22 March 2007 - 05:40 PM
That's what he wants us to think.
#12
Posted 22 March 2007 - 05:41 PM
Jay

#14
Posted 22 March 2007 - 11:06 PM
#15
Posted 23 March 2007 - 02:49 AM
It's okay that you had a reason for playing the hand the way you did, but you have to be willing to be flexible. I don't hate your plan against a villain like this, but once that flop comes out and he doesn't make his huge bet, you have to raise almost the size of the pot.
So, your terrible playing wasn't your idea --- it was just sticking to that plan once it was time to jump off that train.
You seem willing to listen though. That's good. Also, why did you wait 2.5 years to make your first post?
#16
Posted 23 March 2007 - 06:07 AM
#17
Posted 24 March 2007 - 07:51 AM
#18
Posted 27 March 2007 - 07:53 AM
Villian led out post flop, check called the turn, and checked the river.
His post flop lead indicates to me he is trying to narrow the field because he has a marginal hand and it likely wouldn't hold up against a larger group.
His check call as opposed to a continuation or check raise is a further indication of a marginal hand.
His check on the river is a likely indication he would fold to decent size bet.
But then again ISAP and have never won crap.
#19
Posted 27 March 2007 - 11:31 AM
And raise preflop. LAGs will make this call.
#20
Posted 27 March 2007 - 02:05 PM
- Jordan
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users










