Can The Plane Take Off?
#1
Posted 08 March 2007 - 01:45 PM
A plane is standing on a runway that is made of a large conveyor belt. The plane fires up its engines, but as it moves forward, the conveyor belt senses the speed of the plane's wheels and moves at exactly the same speed in the opposite direction. Can the plane take off?
I'm after good solid logic and math rather than just a yes or no on this one.
#2
Posted 08 March 2007 - 01:46 PM
#3
Posted 08 March 2007 - 01:46 PM
#4
Posted 08 March 2007 - 01:49 PM
[/thread]
Moe: Yeah?
Homer: See, I got this friend named... Joey Jo Jo... Junior... Shabadoo.
Moe: That's the worst name I ever heard.
#5
Posted 08 March 2007 - 01:51 PM

#6
Posted 08 March 2007 - 01:51 PM
Hey Joey. I posted your thread about 'Embarrassing Touchings' on a site that I use in the UK. They loved it.
#7
Posted 08 March 2007 - 01:53 PM
No this is a standard jet liner.
#8
Posted 08 March 2007 - 01:53 PM
yeah that would probably be best before anyone says something silly, which is what always happens with this question.
#9
Posted 08 March 2007 - 01:55 PM
#10
Posted 08 March 2007 - 01:55 PM
I'm internationally famous.
Moe: Yeah?
Homer: See, I got this friend named... Joey Jo Jo... Junior... Shabadoo.
Moe: That's the worst name I ever heard.
#11
Posted 08 March 2007 - 01:56 PM
A plane is standing on a runway that is made of a large conveyor belt. The plane fires up its engines, but as it moves forward, the conveyor belt senses the speed of the plane's wheels and moves at exactly the same speed in the opposite direction. Can the plane take off?
I'm after good solid logic and math rather than just a yes or no on this one.
unless the conveyor belt moves the air, too, i think the plane's good to go.
edit for a more full explanation:
barring the rotational-inertial/frictional force in the wheels that will actually move the plane backwards when the conveyor belt goes (which would always be less than the full force of the conveyor belt, anyhow, unless the wheels were locked still), the engines that are "pushing off the air," at least functionally, don't experience a counteractive force to the engine in any appreciable way. hence, the plane still goes forward.

#12
Posted 08 March 2007 - 01:56 PM
#13
Posted 08 March 2007 - 01:56 PM
#14
Posted 08 March 2007 - 01:57 PM
Is that a statement or a question?..... well you are now, if only at least to a small community.
#15
Posted 08 March 2007 - 02:00 PM



#16
Posted 08 March 2007 - 02:00 PM
QFT

#17
Posted 08 March 2007 - 02:01 PM
Where is this place you speak of?
#18
Posted 08 March 2007 - 02:02 PM
In this case we are only talking about the theoretical aspect, not the actual.
#19
Posted 08 March 2007 - 02:04 PM
I couldn't tell if you were asking for links or making a joke.
If a joke: ha ha
If a link: Straight Dope and the followup. This site also has discussions. Also, just search on "plane on conveyor" for lots more.



#20
Posted 08 March 2007 - 02:07 PM
Theoretically or actually... the plane is not moving. It won't take off.
Go the gym, get on a treadmill. When you run you will feel no wind on your face. No wind, no lift.
Now, attach a chain to the front landing gear and put the plane in a wind tunnel. It's not making forward momentum, but the wind being forced over the wings would cause lift and the plane would take off.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users









