10 handed low LIMIT 1) low pocket pairs... 22-66 eg. wired 5s UTG+ 1 ?2) K 10s in the small blind to a middle position raise one caller ?3) 86s in the bb, UTG raises 4 callers all the way around ---------my answers:1) fold em unless in late position getting at least 5:1 to call, straight outta sklansky (as i type this i folded 2s in EP flop cam A Q 2 ....)2) i folded it because there werent many people in the pot and i was only getting 4:1 odds and possible action behind me also if i did flop a big draw there wouldnt be enough players to pay me off3)unlike the K 10 i called here beacuse i was getting 9:1 odds and i was the one ending the action your thoughts?
0
opinions on questionable calls
Started by
, Apr 05 2005 07:25 AM
6 replies to this topic
#2
Swift_Psycho
-
- Members
- 4,889 posts
Poker Forum Veteran
Posted 05 April 2005 - 07:30 AM
Your answers seem fine to me.
#3
Vade
-
- Members
- 3,864 posts
Forum Shopkeeper
- Gender:Male
- Location:Milwaukee, WI
- Interests:Poker, Sports, Movies
Posted 05 April 2005 - 09:11 AM
Is folding low pp in early in Sklansky?Either way I disagree, you should limp with any pocket pair
Last night I stayed up late playing poker with Tarot cards. I got a full house and four people died.
#4
justblaze
-
- Members
- 4,430 posts
Poker Forum Veteran
Posted 05 April 2005 - 09:22 AM
Vade said:
Is folding low pp in early in Sklansky?Either way I disagree, you should limp with any pocket pair
#5
princeof56k
-
- Members
- 1,520 posts
Poker Forum Veteran
- Location:houston, tx
Posted 05 April 2005 - 10:05 AM
Limping from EP with low pocket pairs depends on how loose or tight the table is. I only play low pocket pairs from EP if I'm fairly certain (from previous hands of course) there will be a lot of callers and the chance of being raised is low.
#6
rog
-
- Members
- 1,870 posts
Little Lebowski Urban Achiever
Posted 05 April 2005 - 11:18 AM
Your answers are fine. A call with your PP is fine too if the game is loose. This is out of sklansky as well. I play low pocket pairs somewhere in between the "loose" and "tight" tabs of the sklansky 2+2 spreadsheet that was circulating.
Rog
"I got it, I got it. Last words: I dig music! . . . I'M ON DRUGS!"
"I got it, I got it. Last words: I dig music! . . . I'M ON DRUGS!"
#7
justblaze
-
- Members
- 4,430 posts
Poker Forum Veteran
Posted 05 April 2005 - 11:36 AM
actually, loose-tight is less important than passive-aggressive. you dont want to play small pairs out of position for a raise. ever.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users
