Money022 0 Posted February 5, 2007 Share Posted February 5, 2007 Between NL HE and PLO, which is more of a game of position? I play mostly Hold'em and realize how important position is. I'm just starting to play more Omaha and don't have much of a strategy yet and was wondering if position is just as important. Your thoughts? Link to post Share on other sites
David_Nicoson 1 Posted February 5, 2007 Share Posted February 5, 2007 Conventional wisdom is that position in more important in PLO. Players with even monster hands can't afford to give free cards, so when a round checks around it usually really means something. Link to post Share on other sites
JLocke 0 Posted February 5, 2007 Share Posted February 5, 2007 Definitely PLO, and it's not very close at all IMO. Checking with good hands is usually way to dangerous, just like David_Nicoson wrote. Link to post Share on other sites
iggymcfly 0 Posted February 5, 2007 Share Posted February 5, 2007 Position's 100x more important in PLO. It's not even close. About 100 different middle connected hands are more valuable on the button than AAKKds upfront unless stacks are shallow enough to get a significant portion of your stack in preflop. Link to post Share on other sites
Actuary 3 Posted February 7, 2007 Share Posted February 7, 2007 is it because of the bet-sizing or due to Omaha vs HE.I mean, if it were NL-Omaha, would position still be more important with Omaha? Link to post Share on other sites
Money022 0 Posted February 7, 2007 Author Share Posted February 7, 2007 If PLO is a greater game of position, would your flop percentage be lower...on average? Link to post Share on other sites
David_Nicoson 1 Posted February 7, 2007 Share Posted February 7, 2007 is it because of the bet-sizing or due to Omaha vs HE.I mean, if it were NL-Omaha, would position still be more important with Omaha?Pot-limit structure also makes position more important, but I think Omaha vs. Hold'em is a much bigger factor. Link to post Share on other sites
David_Nicoson 1 Posted February 7, 2007 Share Posted February 7, 2007 If PLO is a greater game of position, would your flop percentage be lower...on average?We have a positional advantage just as often as a positional disadvantage, so I don't think it should affect our overall VP$IP%. The difference between our UTG VP$IP and our button VP$IP should be greater in Omaha. Link to post Share on other sites
navybuttons 16 Posted February 7, 2007 Share Posted February 7, 2007 Position's 100x more important in PLO. It's not even close. About 100 different middle connected hands are more valuable on the button than AAKKds upfront unless stacks are shallow enough to get a significant portion of your stack in preflop.yes.you could probably play every hand that isn't trips on the button (deepstacks obv. w/o too much p/f action) and fold every hand from every other position and still be profitable.watch a HU high stakes PLO match and see how often the BB 3-bets. Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now