Jump to content


$100 Hu On Fulltilt


  • Please log in to reply
20 replies to this topic

#1 simo_8ball

simo_8ball

    Multipass

  • Members
  • 9,277 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Searching for a purpose
  • Favorite Poker Game:PLO/NLHE

Posted 03 February 2007 - 01:48 PM

Full Tilt Poker
No Limit Holdem Tournament
Blinds: t15/t30
2 players
Converter

Stack sizes:
Hero: t1540
BB: t1460

Pre-flop: (2 players) Hero is SB with 3 icon_suit_club.gif 9 icon_suit_club.gif
Hero calls t15 (pot was t45), BB checks.

Flop: 3 icon_suit_diamond.gif 2 icon_suit_heart.gif 8 icon_suit_diamond.gif (t60, 2 players)
BB checks, Hero bets t40, BB calls t40 (pot was t100).

Turn: 4 icon_suit_club.gif (t140, 2 players)
BB checks, Hero checks.

River: 3 icon_suit_spade.gif (t140, 2 players)
BB is all-in t1390, Hero?



Villain had been playing 'normally' until this point. No real read.

#2 Zach6668

Zach6668

    2009 Stanley Cup Champions

  • Moderators
  • 36,830 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Thunder Bay, ON

Posted 03 February 2007 - 01:53 PM

I instacall.

I can't justify it other than he can't imagine you have a 3, so he's rarely doing one of those "shove with the nuts" moves and expecting a call, IMO.
QUOTE (serge @ Tuesday, May 12th, 2009, 7:20 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
LETS GO PITTSBURGH
QUOTE (Acid_Knight @ Monday, March 10th, 2008, 4:15 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Zach is right about pretty much everything.

#3 rocketpoker828

rocketpoker828

    The Future

  • Members
  • 3,941 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:The Land of LeBron
  • Interests:Poker, Baseball, Football, Basketball, Hockey, Video games, pwning N00bs, my wonderful fiance.
  • Favorite Poker Game:NLHE SNGs, PLO cash games

Posted 03 February 2007 - 02:18 PM

I call, and expect to see a busted flush draw muck.
QUOTE (Brad Childress)
On the Vikings‘ participation in community outreach programs:

Our players probably get way more out of it than the kids that they touch.

#4 ChrisRichey

ChrisRichey

    Suddenly, things are just a little more bearable

  • Members
  • 2,387 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 03 February 2007 - 03:32 PM

Wow. I call and expect him to show 56d.

#5 Zach6668

Zach6668

    2009 Stanley Cup Champions

  • Moderators
  • 36,830 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Thunder Bay, ON

Posted 03 February 2007 - 06:02 PM

QUOTE (ChrisRichey @ Saturday, February 3rd, 2007, 6:32 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Wow. I call and expect him to show 56d.

Then why do you call?
QUOTE (serge @ Tuesday, May 12th, 2009, 7:20 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
LETS GO PITTSBURGH
QUOTE (Acid_Knight @ Monday, March 10th, 2008, 4:15 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Zach is right about pretty much everything.

#6 ChrisRichey

ChrisRichey

    Suddenly, things are just a little more bearable

  • Members
  • 2,387 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 03 February 2007 - 06:03 PM

QUOTE (Zach6668 @ Saturday, February 3rd, 2007, 6:02 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Then why do you call?


Lol, implying that that's how I run.

#7 XXEddie

XXEddie

    I have a pair, I have a top pair.

  • Members
  • 13,401 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Centennial, CO

Posted 03 February 2007 - 06:04 PM

QUOTE (Zach6668 @ Saturday, February 3rd, 2007, 7:02 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Then why do you call?

QFT

just because you have trips doesnt mean you have to call.

This does look a lot like a missed flush draw, but as Chris pointed out it could be like 56d or even A5d, but i think he woulda have played those more aggressively

Call

#8 navybuttons

navybuttons

    What?

  • Members
  • 4,817 posts

Posted 03 February 2007 - 06:08 PM

i think we gotta call. i just can't see a competent player pushing here w/ 56 hoping we were betting the 3 on the flop.

there's a lot of overbet bluffers out there and i'd hope that villain is one.
if you're not playing the notes in front of you it's not mozart.

#9 Zach6668

Zach6668

    2009 Stanley Cup Champions

  • Moderators
  • 36,830 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Thunder Bay, ON

Posted 03 February 2007 - 06:34 PM

QUOTE (navybuttons @ Saturday, February 3rd, 2007, 9:08 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
i think we gotta call. i just can't see a competent player pushing here w/ 56 hoping we were betting the 3 on the flop.

there's a lot of overbet bluffers out there and i'd hope that villain is one.

Exactly, like I said, villain would have to have an insane read to give us credit for a 3 here. There's nothing else that would call this shove here, so this is almost never one of those "nut shoves".
QUOTE (serge @ Tuesday, May 12th, 2009, 7:20 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
LETS GO PITTSBURGH
QUOTE (Acid_Knight @ Monday, March 10th, 2008, 4:15 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Zach is right about pretty much everything.

#10 copernicus

copernicus

    Poker Forum God

  • Members
  • 10,676 posts
  • Interests:Hockey; poker...duh

Posted 03 February 2007 - 07:42 PM

Hes got a wide range but hero should be better than 50:50 here
___________


Wave upon wave of Demented Avengers march cheerfully out of obscurity into the dream.



#11 GABMAD

GABMAD

    Poker Forum Groupie

  • Members
  • 741 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:London Ontario
  • Interests:poker (obviously), mountain biking, baseball
  • Favorite Poker Game:HU/short-handed, NL Hold'em

Posted 03 February 2007 - 08:32 PM

I'm gonna have to say fold. He's either got a three, a set (a boat), or a straight with 65.

Move on to the next hand. You haven't invested enough and are getting like 1:1 basically.


EDIT AFTER READING RESPONSES: forgot to mention the flush draw. He would not bet all in to bluff it. The pot is too small. He'd make pot sized bet. I guess I'm the only one going with 'fold'...I think I'm right.

#12 trystero

trystero

    Poker Forum Veteran

  • Members
  • 3,780 posts

Posted 03 February 2007 - 08:38 PM

QUOTE (GABMAD @ Saturday, February 3rd, 2007, 11:32 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
I'm gonna have to say fold. He's either got a three, a set (a boat), or a straight with 65.

Move on to the next hand. You haven't invested enough and are getting like 1:1 basically.
EDIT AFTER READING RESPONSES: forgot to mention the flush draw. He would not bet all in to bluff it. The pot is too small. He'd make pot sized bet. I guess I'm the only one going with 'fold'...I think I'm right.


This looks far more like a bluff than a nutz shove. I give credit for a big hand after a shove when we've shown to like our own hand. We've done no such thing here, simply betting on the flop. Villain has no reason to believe that we're as strong as three of a kind, so pushing a fullhouse or straight here would be stupid to say the least.

I can't see how we're wrong >50% of the time here

#13 GABMAD

GABMAD

    Poker Forum Groupie

  • Members
  • 741 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:London Ontario
  • Interests:poker (obviously), mountain biking, baseball
  • Favorite Poker Game:HU/short-handed, NL Hold'em

Posted 03 February 2007 - 08:41 PM

QUOTE (trystero @ Sunday, February 4th, 2007, 4:38 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
This looks far more like a bluff than a nutz shove. I give credit for a big hand after a shove when we've shown to like our own hand. We've done no such thing here, simply betting on the flop. Villain has no reason to believe that we're as strong as three of a kind, so pushing a fullhouse or straight here would be stupid to say the least.


I've seen it done many times. and look at the odds that the pot is laying you. Not worth it. You've invested 70 and are willing to call that much more? People shove the nutz here because they know that you know that the bet looks weak and they think you'll pay them off with a crappy hand trying to make a big call. I bet this is one of these situations. Post results OP I want to know lol

#14 simo_8ball

simo_8ball

    Multipass

  • Members
  • 9,277 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Searching for a purpose
  • Favorite Poker Game:PLO/NLHE

Posted 04 February 2007 - 03:47 AM

QUOTE (GABMAD @ Sunday, February 4th, 2007, 4:41 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Post results OP I want to know lol


Hero folds. Villain mucks.

/shrug

#15 tskillz187

tskillz187

    Great Tiger, you're next!

  • Members
  • 6,131 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Brockport/Buffalo, NY

Posted 04 February 2007 - 10:25 AM

QUOTE (simo_8ball @ Sunday, February 4th, 2007, 3:47 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Hero folds. Villain mucks.

/shrug


I don't mind the fold. Is it worth it for a 140 pot, I don't know. People think that shoving here s stupid, but if he is going to get a call of a value bet on the river of say 100, he just needs this play to work 1:14 times for it to get the same result. Overbets are so cool.
Naismith (2:56:11 PM): fuckerflakeoutonmystakingnowmakingmillions

#16 GABMAD

GABMAD

    Poker Forum Groupie

  • Members
  • 741 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:London Ontario
  • Interests:poker (obviously), mountain biking, baseball
  • Favorite Poker Game:HU/short-handed, NL Hold'em

Posted 04 February 2007 - 12:53 PM

QUOTE (simo_8ball @ Sunday, February 4th, 2007, 11:47 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Hero folds. Villain mucks.

/shrug


lol...nice laydown

#17 Zach6668

Zach6668

    2009 Stanley Cup Champions

  • Moderators
  • 36,830 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Thunder Bay, ON

Posted 04 February 2007 - 04:42 PM

QUOTE (tskillz187 @ Sunday, February 4th, 2007, 1:25 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
I don't mind the fold. Is it worth it for a 140 pot, I don't know. People think that shoving here s stupid, but if he is going to get a call of a value bet on the river of say 100, he just needs this play to work 1:14 times for it to get the same result. Overbets are so cool.

It's not a 140 pot. It's a 1530 pot.

We only have to be goot here a bit less than 50% of the time.
QUOTE (serge @ Tuesday, May 12th, 2009, 7:20 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
LETS GO PITTSBURGH
QUOTE (Acid_Knight @ Monday, March 10th, 2008, 4:15 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Zach is right about pretty much everything.

#18 tskillz187

tskillz187

    Great Tiger, you're next!

  • Members
  • 6,131 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Brockport/Buffalo, NY

Posted 04 February 2007 - 06:22 PM

Yeah, I know. I guess I meant we have very little invested here. I don't mind calling, I just think folding is fine too.
Naismith (2:56:11 PM): fuckerflakeoutonmystakingnowmakingmillions

#19 Mercury69

Mercury69

    "I'll leave when I'm good and ready."

  • Members
  • 14,128 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Pftph!
  • Favorite Poker Game:NLHE

Posted 05 February 2007 - 08:47 AM

I'm folding this to the club flush possibilities...I think villain checked the turn hoping Hero would bet out again and decided to push the river hoping the Hero would read it as weakness. There's no reason to call off your stack hoping he either doesn't have a flush or a str8 or, less likeyl, a higher set (or even the case 3 with a better kicker).
“We had all the momentum. We were riding the crest of a high and beautiful wave. So now, less than five years later, you can go up on a steep hill in Las Vegas and look west, and with the right kind of eyes you can almost see the high-water mark, that place where the wave finally broke and rolled back.” —Raoul Duke, Fear And Loathing In Las Vegas

#20 Bubba83

Bubba83

    Poker Forum Veteran

  • Members
  • 1,425 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Sunnyvale, CA
  • Interests:Web Programming<br />Computer Games<br />Beer Tasting<br />Roller Coasters
  • Favorite Poker Game:7 Stud Hi/Lo

Posted 05 February 2007 - 08:50 AM

There isn't a possibility of a flush.




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users