Whats your play after this? I dont think he reraiser has to have a premium hand since his stack is so short..Do you try to isolate here against him? Muck? PokerStars Game #7769682733: Tournament #39710066, $10+$1 Hold'em No Limit - Level VIII (200/400) - 2007/01/04 - 22:04:08 (ET)Table '39710066 11' 9-max Seat #4 is the buttonSeat 1: Happiegoluck (5580 in chips) Seat 2: djung (1935 in chips) Seat 3: cript29 (8265 in chips) Seat 4: DarLRay8 (23073 in chips) Seat 5: rjg85 (26342 in chips) Seat 6: throwemaway (12615 in chips) Seat 7: basnator (5600 in chips) Seat 9: bellladonna (4190 in chips) rjg85: posts small blind 200throwemaway: posts big blind 400*** HOLE CARDS ***Dealt to throwemaway [As Qs]basnator: folds bellladonna: folds Happiegoluck: raises 800 to 1200djung: raises 710 to 1910 and is all-incript29: folds DarLRay8: folds rjg85: folds throwemaway:?
Aq In Bb After Action
Started by throwemaway, Jan 05 2007 10:46 AM
5 replies to this topic
#1
Posted 05 January 2007 - 10:46 AM
|
First blog. I don't really know why you would want to read it but if you do, go ahead..New update! Will update in Feb in light of 4.40 challenge!
http://blogs.texasholdem.com/Throwemaway/index.php
First blog. I don't really know why you would want to read it but if you do, go ahead..New update! Will update in Feb in light of 4.40 challenge!
http://blogs.texasholdem.com/Throwemaway/index.php
#2
Posted 05 January 2007 - 10:51 AM
Looks like the converter had a brain cramp!
___________
Wave upon wave of Demented Avengers march cheerfully out of obscurity into the dream.
Wave upon wave of Demented Avengers march cheerfully out of obscurity into the dream.
#3
Posted 05 January 2007 - 11:16 AM
Given the initial raiser's stack size, I'd probably just fold here. I don't think an isolation raise is going to work here often enough and I don't know how good our hand is going to be against 2 allins.If our stack was smaller, I think the right play would be to push.
#4
Posted 05 January 2007 - 11:55 AM
Level 8....hmm, has the bubble been broken yet?Unless UTG was on a steal...which is unlikely, I don't think an isolation play will work and we are playing for half our stack.At least one of your cards is likely duplicated, so I'm leaning towards a fold.Any other reads on UTG? If we flat called, would he play nice and check down for an elimination?
Offending people since 1973.
#5
Posted 05 January 2007 - 12:04 PM
throwemaway, on Friday, January 5th, 2007, 10:46 AM, said:
Whats your play after this? I dont think he reraiser has to have a premium hand since his stack is so short..Do you try to isolate here against him? Muck? PokerStars Game #7769682733: Tournament #39710066, $10+$1 Hold'em No Limit - Level VIII (200/400) - 2007/01/04 - 22:04:08 (ET)Table '39710066 11' 9-max Seat #4 is the buttonSeat 1: Happiegoluck (5580 in chips) Seat 2: djung (1935 in chips) Seat 3: cript29 (8265 in chips) Seat 4: DarLRay8 (23073 in chips) Seat 5: rjg85 (26342 in chips) Seat 6: throwemaway (12615 in chips) Seat 7: basnator (5600 in chips) Seat 9: bellladonna (4190 in chips) rjg85: posts small blind 200throwemaway: posts big blind 400*** HOLE CARDS ***Dealt to throwemaway [As Qs]basnator: folds bellladonna: folds Happiegoluck: raises 800 to 1200djung: raises 710 to 1910 and is all-incript29: folds DarLRay8: folds rjg85: folds throwemaway:?
"X"
http://www.myspace.com/excutioner
Always keep'em guessing
:) always go for FIRST not to be just in the money!
http://www.myspace.com/excutioner
Always keep'em guessing
:) always go for FIRST not to be just in the money!
#6
Posted 05 January 2007 - 02:05 PM
Its a tough read on UTG. His M<10, committing 20+% of his stack, which could be middle pair, A8-AJ, KQ or monsters. If we were button I would just call, but OOP we're dead to 70% of the flops, and are a favorite against his range. Id go ahead and push.
___________
Wave upon wave of Demented Avengers march cheerfully out of obscurity into the dream.
Wave upon wave of Demented Avengers march cheerfully out of obscurity into the dream.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users









