BudBundy 0 Posted December 26, 2006 Share Posted December 26, 2006 Game #2889709653: Omaha PL ($0.15/$0.25) - 2006/12/26 - 11:29:50 (DST)Table "Clinker" Seat 6 is the button. Seat 1: jeffss ($60.15 in chips)Seat 2: Nofear001 ($24.75 in chips)Seat 3: Tiltghost ($32.50 in chips)Seat 4: Zawisza sits outSeat 5: Dugp01012 ($20.35 in chips)Seat 6: Devilson ($39.95 in chips)Seat 7: Luckymoh ($21.83 in chips)Seat 8: Torylight ($34.20 in chips)Seat 9: TED18 ($8.35 in chips)Seat 10: KongFisk sits outLuckymoh: posts small blind $0.15Torylight: posts big blind $0.25----- HOLE CARDS -----dealt to jeffss [Jc Qc Qs Jh]TED18: foldsjeffss: raises to $0.90Nofear001: calls $0.90Tiltghost: foldsDugp01012: foldsDevilson: calls $0.90Luckymoh: calls $0.75QIzbyt joins the table at seat #4Torylight: calls $0.65----- FLOP ----- [Js 8h Kc]Luckymoh: checksTorylight: checksjeffss: bets $4.50TED18 sits outNofear001: calls $4.50Devilson: foldsLuckymoh: foldsTorylight: folds----- TURN ----- [Js 8h Kc][Qd]jeffss: checksI put him on 10 9 or a slowplayed KK.I had only 8 outs for the board to pair.Is checking weak here? Link to post Share on other sites
bdc30 0 Posted December 26, 2006 Share Posted December 26, 2006 I put him on 10 9 or a slowplayed KK.I had only 8 outs for the board to pair.Is checking weak here?If you have him on KK, you only have two outs in the deck. I think Smash used to say something to the effect of "low sets are for suckers"Continually putting money in to a draw-heavy board, where you think you may already be drawingvirtually dead (in the case of KK) is recipe for disaster in plo. Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now