My Standard River Bluff

[antistuff 0]

The converter screwed up the dollar amounts but that doesnt matter much. I make this move a lot and have had a lot of success with it. Just sharing I guess. Full Tilt PokerPot Limit Omaha Ring gameBlinds: $0.55/$1.19 playersConverterStack sizes:UTG: $70UTG+1: $6.85MP1: $35MP2: $70antistuff: $1.70CO: $50Button: $55SB: $90BB: $10Pre-flop: (9 players) antistuff is MP3 with 3 Q A 5 2 folds, MP2 calls, antistuff calls, 2 folds, SB calls, BB, folds, UTG (poster) checks.Flop: 4 K 2 ($5.5, 4 players)UTG checks, MP2 checks, antistuff bets $50, SB calls, 2 folds.Turn: 9 ($105.5, 2 players)antistuff checks, SB checks.River: K ($105.5, 2 players)antistuff bets $50, SB folds.Uncalled bets: $50 returned to antistuff. Results:Final pot: $105.5

[JacKingOff_suit 0]

I don't like it.If I were the small blind I would had bet with nothing on the river. But obviously SB is a poor player.

[antistuff 0]

I don't like it.If I were the small blind I would had bet with nothing on the river. But obviously SB is a poor player.

the converter really screwed up. he wasnt the sb, he had posistion on me. which is exactly what you are saying i think.

[JacKingOff_suit 0]

Let me clarify a bit when I said "I don't like it", assuming "SB" was SB.I meant I didn't like your turn play and "SB"s river play.If SB checked the turn. I assumed the followings, 1. SB had a weak made hand. 2. SB was drawing low. 3. SB was drawing flush. 4. SB was check-raising you. But SB had to know you and really had a strong hand to do 4. But anyway in any cases you still have good pot equity in this hand. I would had bet 2/3 of the pot, and it will leave some rooms for both you and SB on the river play.SB really should had bet the river if you checked the turn.But as for you, if "SB" checked the flop, turn and river. Weak means weak and your river bluff is fine, I will bet about 2/3 of the pot and I will be hardpressed that SB could call.As far as the real situation is, yes nice bluff.

[antistuff 0]

Let me clarify a bit when I said "I don't like it", assuming "SB" was SB.I meant I didn't like your turn play and "SB"s river play.If SB checked the turn. I assumed the followings, 1. SB had a weak made hand. 2. SB was drawing low. 3. SB was drawing flush. 4. SB was check-raising you. But SB had to know you and really had a strong hand to do 4. But anyway in any cases you still have good pot equity in this hand. I would had bet 2/3 of the pot, and it will leave some rooms for both you and SB on the river play.SB really should had bet the river if you checked the turn.But as for you, if "SB" checked the flop, turn and river. Weak means weak and your river bluff is fine, I will bet about 2/3 of the pot and I will be hardpressed that SB could call.As far as the real situation is, yes nice bluff.

any merit in me betting him into on that turn?

[DonkSlayer 1]

any merit in me betting him into on that turn?

No. We have the nut low draw so we still have a good chance to at least split the pot on the river, and if he is sticking around on the flop with something similar, and we don't want to have him more priced in on the river to call a bluff with his A935 because the pot is big.

[KVOM 0]

Original post says PL, but seems from the betting that this is a NL hand.