Weak Fold?

[bdc30 0]

PokerStars Pot-Limit Omaha High, $2 BB (9 handed) Hand History Converter Tool from FlopTurnRiver.com (Format: FCP)Hero ($190)MP3 ($3.70)CO ($85.35)Button ($126)SB ($112.25)BB ($40)UTG ($172.40)UTG+1 ($195)MP1 ($98.10)Preflop: Hero is MP2 with 9 , A , 9 , 5 . UTG calls $2, UTG+1 calls $2, MP1 calls $2, Hero calls $2, 1 fold, CO calls $2, 1 fold, SB completes, BB checks.Flop: ($14) 7 , 5 , 8 (7 players)SB checks, BB checks, UTG checks, UTG+1 checks, MP1 bets $2, Hero calls $2, CO raises to $4, SB calls $4, BB raises to $33.3, UTG folds, UTG+1 folds, MP1 calls $31.30, Hero folds.............We cool here? Should I be calling and re-evaluating on the turn, no point in re-potting is there? Dammit!!

[BudBundy 0]

Deffo call.If MP1 or CO re-pops i am pushing there.I only fold this if MP1 doesn't call the flop check-raise.

[JacKingOff_suit 0]

Are you out of your mind? It's definitely a call at least.If MP1 or CO re-pops i am pushing there.Nah, I will just call and make everyone else come along. The more money in the better.Edited: also, the power of your hand is your holdng two key cards, two 9s.

[BudBundy 0]

IMHO if we miss turn we can't call a pot there.If we hit on turn i doubt we are getting a call.I am not saying calling flop is a bad play.Its just a more cautious way to play this hand.

[bdc30 0]

Bundy, first you say call, then you say it's a weak way to play the hand...Is it a fold, then? Are you advocating a re-pot??

[BudBundy 0]

If MP1 or CO re-pops i am pushing there.Nah, I will just call and make everyone else come along. The more money in the better.

I am advocating a re-pot at this situation.Me and Jack are discussing what to do in a hypothetical situation where MP1 re-pots instead of just calling flop.

[tapeworm 0]

Ok...I am still learning Omaha, so don't take this as the deffo truth, but I think this is a call.I mean, the worst hand that I could think that you could be against was like a made str8 with a flush draw which gives you 42.4% equity. http://www.pokerlama.com/#g~o!p~4!...!b~7h_5s_8sActually, I guess you could possibly be against a made str8 with a made set, that gives you only 33.3%. http://www.pokerlama.com/#g~o!p~4!...!b~7h_5s_8sJust looking at those seems limiting. i tried throwing in a bunch of random and not so random hands that might have connected with this flop and got that you have about 43.6% equity. I think it is more, if he doesn't hold spades.http://www.pokerlama.com/#g~o!p~4!...!b~7h_5s_8sI also like the point that you hold two 9s, making there be less str8s out there. Seems like a call.P.S. I just found this www.pokerlama.com site and it is really solid. Alot better than twodimes anyways.

[benhoug 0]

We cool here? Should I be calling and re-evaluating on the turn, no point in re-potting is there? Dammit!!

I hate just calling a $2 into a $14 pot. As played I call the $33 re-raise. There are a lot of cards that help us out.

[iggymcfly 0]

Yeah, in position, I definitely would have potted this on the flop when it was first $2 to me. As played though, it's a definite call, as we have more than 33% equity three-ways and we can fold if the board pairs, but a set can't fold when we hit our flush.