When Your Skill Level Is Higher Than Your Br
#1
Posted 02 December 2006 - 02:02 PM
#2
Posted 02 December 2006 - 02:07 PM
So even though it may be frustrating, as you know that you have beaten higher games, it doesn't pay to play out of your variance limits.
#3
Posted 02 December 2006 - 02:08 PM
I'm sort of doing the same thing by playing $1/2 with under 200BB, but I think with bonus and rakeback I think (hope) I should be good.
#4
Posted 02 December 2006 - 02:29 PM
i'm almost back to where i should be playing after doing that for about 3-4 months.
good luck!

#5
Posted 02 December 2006 - 03:14 PM
#6
Posted 03 December 2006 - 01:49 AM

for great rakeback paid daily at RakeUpdate, click here !
for great rakeback paid monthly at RaketheRake, please refer to member RTR20401
#7
Posted 03 December 2006 - 02:21 AM
#8
Posted 03 December 2006 - 02:26 AM
Having said that, I'm accepting stakes to play 1/2 or 2/4 LHE on AP. $500 will suffice, unless you want to jump me right to 2/4, then I can play with $1000. kthx.
#9
Posted 03 December 2006 - 03:55 AM
Having said that, I'm accepting stakes to play 1/2 or 2/4 LHE on AP. $500 will suffice, unless you want to jump me right to 2/4, then I can play with $1000. kthx.
can you wait 10 days tops?
#10
Posted 03 December 2006 - 04:38 AM
I'm so mad about this whole busto thing. I was planning on grinding like 1000000 hands in December since I had no school. I'm forgoing soooo much money by sucking at life in other monetary areas....lol
I can wait, if I don't find anything beforehand, is what I'm trying to say.
#11
Posted 03 December 2006 - 04:48 AM
railing 101 video
crush their dreams like aluminum cans.
then take them in for recycling.
5 cents a dream, man.
#12
Posted 03 December 2006 - 04:53 AM
Head?
#13
Posted 03 December 2006 - 04:55 AM
Standard deal is 50% of poker profits, I would imagine, although 100% risk assumed, but ideally, I would just like to be rolled for whatever level, like say 1/2 full, so 250 bb's is enough, and then play for a set amount of time, or until my BR reaches a set amount, say 1500, for example, and then refund the base $500 + 50% of the profit, or whatever...
In actuality, that is such an amazing deal in terms of ROR for the backer, you're looking at 100% ROR in a short time frame, assuming no massive downswings. I know I can beat full ring LHE, plus there's RB and bonuses from AP to counteract any downswing, so being properly rolled at 250-300 bbs = 0.05% of going broke, or whatever the risk of ruin calculation would be.
lol, if there's enough interest, which there probably won't be, and I'm just begging because I'm desperate, there should be bidding to see how low I can get the % of profits, lol. As it is, from my experiences, standard is usually 50% anyways, using a timeframe, or certain amount limit, it's not like 50% forever.
(Same can be applied for 2/4 with a roll of 1k).
not quite that desperate. yet...
#14
Posted 03 December 2006 - 05:07 AM
I am just waiting for my rakeback and clearing a few bonuses.I am not promising anything but its a good deal and deffo worth consideration.
How do you sort the trust issue?
#15
Posted 03 December 2006 - 09:23 AM
He played the $530 Stars WCOOP, or however much it was, the first one, and I bought part of him. He placed in the money and sent me back my money with no problems.
#16
Posted 03 December 2006 - 09:39 AM
I'll insure the return of money. (the stake, not my 20%)
So, for you to get screwed, Zach would have to not pay and I would have to not pay.
oh, and Zach, you would pay the staker, I'm just backup.
you can trust Zach, but any doubts, pay me 20% juice. You'll still profit..
Zach, I missed the story... I guess it's related to living away from home, and expenses adding up?
#17
Posted 03 December 2006 - 10:14 AM
I'll insure the return of money. (the stake, not my 20%)
So, for you to get screwed, Zach would have to not pay and I would have to not pay.
oh, and Zach, you would pay the staker, I'm just backup.
you can trust Zach, but any doubts, pay me 20% juice. You'll still profit..
Zach, I missed the story... I guess it's related to living away from home, and expenses adding up?
Take my money back from the books guy and i will give you %20 juice.
#18
Posted 03 December 2006 - 11:24 AM
50% can be a complete rip off to both sides.
50% of what you win after 1 session is a terrible deal for the guy loaning.
50% of a years worth of play is a rip off to the player.
Why not just agree to a set interest rate over a set period of time?
I dont make e-loans. But for people who do, that's probably the best route to take.
With respect to the original topic title,
Almost very single poker player in the world thinks that their skill level is higher than their "bankroll".
The vast, vast, vast majority of them are wrong.
#19
Posted 03 December 2006 - 01:16 PM
I figured he had, since I did not see a thread about it
#20
Posted 03 December 2006 - 02:00 PM
I am a patient guy.I give him one more week then you will see a thread about it.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users










