qq live hand

[hxcxor 0]

...

[obs 0]

Bets that small and never changing despite some scary cards coming up tells me he has nothing.

[wrto4556 0]

hxcxor, I think I seen this hand at 2+2, was that you?

[akishore 0]

generally, don't slowplay past the turn too often. raise on the turn, especially since he's betting smaller into a bigger pot... that screams weakness.as a side note, LAP means loose/aggressive pre-flop, passive post-flop. from your description and hand, he's anything but passive post-flop. loose/aggressive pre and aggressive post is called LAA or LAG.also, how do you read that ken would be raising after you?? you don't really want a multiway pot with queens... raise here even if you feel that ken wants to be in the hand. better to shut out one person (austin or ken) than to lose a big three-way pot. queens are vulnerable, similar to AK, and they don't do well in multiway pots.aseem

[creepy20 0]

I would of raised on the flop, but you said that you had a good read on the guy so maybe just call. Its a scary board for you because didn't you say he will raise preflop with suited connectors and strong hands. Well he did so why would you want to let him take a cheap draw. You have to raise on the turn regardless of your read I think. The board is one off of a straight and and ofcourse the flush draw is still out there and all you have is queens...You would be protecting your hand by raising here. I"m assuming that you meant that the 10h hit on the river and not the 10d since the 10d was on the flop...if this is true than there is a flush out, straight one card off the board and the top pair on the flop just paired on the river and you still just have queens. Now your read on this guy better be 100% accurate because what would of happened if you would of raised on the river and he would of reraised you all in....you couldn't call that. Hopefully your read is good and you took it down...if he made trips on the river and you lost...well you were just asking for somebody to draw out on you. Then again..I could be totally wrong on my whole evaluation

[hxcxor 0]

...