bigkeenanh 0 Posted November 5, 2006 Share Posted November 5, 2006 Tonight played in a friendly SnG, blinds were 10/20, didn't rise ever. Stacks are:-25 white (10) - 250-25 green (20) - 500-15 blue (50) - 750-15 red (75) - 1125-15 black (100) - 1500-15 purple (250) - 3750-15 grey (500) - 7500-15 orange (1000) - 15000I wasn't taking it too seriously (just a game among friends, barely any money involved). This put our M at over 1000. Is it a mistake to fold any hand in any position in this format? I'm curious as to the strategic changes brought on with stacks this deep (including cash games w/ these deep of stacks) Link to post Share on other sites
Zach6668 513 Posted November 5, 2006 Share Posted November 5, 2006 Just play like a deepstacked cash game, because that is essentially what it is.I wouldn't play any 2, but I mean, if they are bad enough to pay you off in any situation, then the odds are there, but if they won't then the implied odds will be smaller, even if they are deep. Link to post Share on other sites
simo_8ball 1 Posted November 5, 2006 Share Posted November 5, 2006 How long did it last? Must have been days. Link to post Share on other sites
bigkeenanh 0 Posted November 5, 2006 Author Share Posted November 5, 2006 Thanks ZachWe had a time limit on it, and whoever had the most chips by the end wins, so only took 3.5 hours Link to post Share on other sites
No_Neck 0 Posted November 5, 2006 Share Posted November 5, 2006 Thanks ZachWe had a time limit on it, and whoever had the most chips by the end wins, so only took 3.5 hoursI would play any suited cards, and two gappers, and single gappers. I would basically play everything except J4o in the small blinds. You will spend a lot of time check folding on the flop but it is funnnnn. Also another important point is that you would prefer a game is passive, so it is easier to hit your draws. Link to post Share on other sites
bigkeenanh 0 Posted November 5, 2006 Author Share Posted November 5, 2006 Thanks!Since it was for fun, and big raises were rare preflop (bets didn't start getting big until turn), I just ended up limping blind every single hand unless there was a raise preflop lol Link to post Share on other sites
Sluggo 0 Posted November 5, 2006 Share Posted November 5, 2006 That sounds stupid to me. The winner will be determined by the last hand of the game.For example, pretend you're in first place in chips in the BB. The time is almost up and this will be your last hand. All of the players acting before you will go all in and then you'll have to call because the pot will be bigger than your stack. In this situation, everyone is playing optimally. Link to post Share on other sites
simo_8ball 1 Posted November 6, 2006 Share Posted November 6, 2006 That sounds stupid to me. The winner will be determined by the last hand of the game.For example, pretend you're in first place in chips in the BB. The time is almost up and this will be your last hand. All of the players acting before you will go all in and then you'll have to call because the pot will be bigger than your stack. In this situation, everyone is playing optimally.Good point. I was trying to thing of a good strategy for this (with regard to the time limit), but I kept thinking I was missing something fundamental. Link to post Share on other sites
stan394 0 Posted November 6, 2006 Share Posted November 6, 2006 That sounds stupid to me. The winner will be determined by the last hand of the game.For example, pretend you're in first place in chips in the BB. The time is almost up and this will be your last hand. All of the players acting before you will go all in and then you'll have to call because the pot will be bigger than your stack. In this situation, everyone is playing optimally.Yeah Time limit won't work for tournaments. We have tried it for our home games and it's a disaster. And EXACTLY what Sluggo said happened - the result is determined by the last hand of the tourney because the short-stack has to go all-in otherwise they are winning nothing anyways. and then the medium stacks are forced to go all-in because if the any of those small stacks won they would have been overtaken. Subsequently all players are forced to go all-in. This will happen unless the chip leader amassed more than half the chips in play or close to it but it rarely happens. So we stopped playing tournament and switched to cash games. Link to post Share on other sites
trystero 0 Posted November 7, 2006 Share Posted November 7, 2006 Yeah Time limit won't work for tournaments. We have tried it for our home games and it's a disaster. And EXACTLY what Sluggo said happened - the result is determined by the last hand of the tourney because the short-stack has to go all-in otherwise they are winning nothing anyways. and then the medium stacks are forced to go all-in because if the any of those small stacks won they would have been overtaken. Subsequently all players are forced to go all-in. This will happen unless the chip leader amassed more than half the chips in play or close to it but it rarely happens. So we stopped playing tournament and switched to cash games.You could try a blind structure. That tends to work well. Link to post Share on other sites
stan394 0 Posted November 7, 2006 Share Posted November 7, 2006 You could try a blind structure. That tends to work well.We had a blind structure, but people still think it takes too long and want to limit the time. Link to post Share on other sites
shrimp4789 0 Posted November 7, 2006 Share Posted November 7, 2006 if they think it takes to long, then make the amount of chips on the table less, and increase the blinds faster Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now