The table is somewhat shorthanded, but I don't think that's really relevant here.
1/2 Hold'em on FullTilt
Hero is BB with 44 (suits irrelevant)
Pre-flop - UTG limps, MP Limps, Hero checks. (3.5 small bets)
Flop - A4x - Hero checks, UTG checks, MP checks. (3.5 small bets)
Turn - A - Hero checks, UTG bets, MP folds, Hero raises, UTG calls (5.5 big bets)
River - A - Hero???
Is this a clear check/fold? Does anyone check/call. For that matter, were the flop and turn checks bad? Obv we're going for a check/raise on both streets, but I'm not sure that's the best play.
Getting Counterfeited
Started by TheCinciKid, Oct 30 2006 12:04 AM
5 replies to this topic
#1
Posted 30 October 2006 - 12:04 AM
"If you're too careful, your whole life can become a ****in' grind." - Mike McDermott, Rounders
my (resurrected) poker blog:
http://cincikid.blogspot.com
my (resurrected) poker blog:
http://cincikid.blogspot.com
#2
Posted 30 October 2006 - 08:07 AM
yes the checks were very bad.
i probobly check/call the river.
i probobly check/call the river.
QUOTE ( Barry Greenstein)
Successful gamblers are compulsive winners.
#3
Posted 30 October 2006 - 09:06 AM
River is a check/call, especially since you only have 2.5 bb's invested into the pot when you had a boat on the turn (yikes).
And, since you didn't get 3-bet on the turn, that "x" on the flop had better be a 3 or 2, or otherwise it matters a lot in this hand.
And, since you didn't get 3-bet on the turn, that "x" on the flop had better be a 3 or 2, or otherwise it matters a lot in this hand.
Fortune favors the brave.
#4
Posted 30 October 2006 - 01:44 PM
Was there a possible flush draw available on the turn?
The "x" really does matter, as DonkSlayer pointed out. Depending on the villain, I am willing to check fold here. You certainly can't come out betting, but I don't think that check calling is horrible.
Against most villains, I'd lean towards the check-fold if he's willing to bet.
The "x" really does matter, as DonkSlayer pointed out. Depending on the villain, I am willing to check fold here. You certainly can't come out betting, but I don't think that check calling is horrible.
Against most villains, I'd lean towards the check-fold if he's willing to bet.
#5
Posted 30 October 2006 - 02:46 PM
I have converted to the church of fast play. Hand plays totally different and, I believe, much easier that way.
"No, I said poker's an honest trade ... only sucker's buck the tiger's odds, they're all on the house."
#6
Posted 03 November 2006 - 09:47 AM
Question 1: Why do people try to check-raise random limpers on the flop?
Question 2: Why do people try to check-raise random limpers on the turn who already checked down the flop??
I get most of my profits in LHE from loose villains who love to chase when way behind.
But they can't make these horribly loose calls unless you bet!
I feel you go for check-raises far too often.
Play more straightforward.
Make more money.
Check-call river
--CM
Question 2: Why do people try to check-raise random limpers on the turn who already checked down the flop??
I get most of my profits in LHE from loose villains who love to chase when way behind.
But they can't make these horribly loose calls unless you bet!
I feel you go for check-raises far too often.
Play more straightforward.
Make more money.
Check-call river
--CM
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users









