Jump to content


tricky no-limit cash game situation, wwyd?


  • Please log in to reply
36 replies to this topic

#1 akishore

akishore

    Poker Forum Veteran

  • Members
  • 6,228 posts
  • Location:Cambridge (Boston), MA
  • Interests:Poker, jazz, programming, taekwondo, rock climbing, movies, etc.

Posted 27 March 2005 - 08:28 PM

i posted this around two or three weeks ago, and only got one reply, which agreed with the play i made. however, for the past two or three weeks since, i have been thinking about this hand repeatedly and have come to the conclusion that i made the wrong play for the wrong reasons, and it cost me.in all honesty, it's really upsetting because my mistake was so very stupid, but i can't change the past. at first sight, the hand looks very easy, but if you think about it seriously, i think this is a great hand which illustrates some key ideas of NL cash games.the game is $100NL with $1/2 blinds. the game is fairly tight/aggressive at this point, and the table is seven-handed. it is near the beginning of the night, so all stacks are roughly $100. for the most part, these opponents are tight/aggressive and have a good amount of poker knowledge. the key opponent in play (UTG) is a fairly by-the-book player but he is capable of being tricky.pre-flop:UTG raises to $7, folds over to me on the button. i wake up to Q :club: Q :) , and i make it $27 to go (reraise of $20 on top). the two blinds fold, and UTG takes a LONG time thinking about whether he should call or not (key point #1: keep raises and reraises pot-sized so that they put pressure on your opponents. min raises for information often backfire against tricky opponents.), and after a few minutes, the table convinces him to call, so he calls. pot is $57.flop: K :) 10 :D 9 :D opponent immediately goes all-in for roughly $70. pot now is roughly $127.what do you do, and WHY? i will post my flawed thinking, results, and my changed, improved thinking after i see a few responses.thanks,aseem

#2 Vade

Vade

    Forum Shopkeeper

  • Members
  • 3,864 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Milwaukee, WI
  • Interests:Poker, Sports, Movies

Posted 27 March 2005 - 08:39 PM

*sigh*Fold. Reluctantly. VERY reluctantlyAKo worries me the most, with A :D with a big kicker worries me, KK or AA are extremely doubtful so toss them outDespite your having two queens, KQ and AQ aren't impossible eitherSo you could be behind:Any KingA made flushA made straight (horribly unlikely)10-10 or 9-9 Going all in is the only shot for those handsNow the short list of hands you are ahead of:J-J insane-but possible on a semibluff with the J of heartsBare Ace of hearts-possible, but only likely if your opponent is looser then thisI cant' think of anything else that's logical for a tight table (assuming you trust your read)
Last night I stayed up late playing poker with Tarot cards. I got a full house and four people died.

#3 Emptyeye

Emptyeye

    Poker Forum Veteran

  • Members
  • 1,136 posts

Posted 27 March 2005 - 08:47 PM

I disagree. Call.It's a tight aggressive table. The made flush is possible, but (Providing "tight/aggressive" translates to "reasonably skilled") a made flush--particularly one which has you drawing practically dead--probably checks here and hopes to induce a bluff out of you. Overpairs are possible, but unlikely given the time it took to call preflop. But this, to me, reeks of the "Classic Internet Move" of pushing all-in on a scary board and praying it didn't help your opponent. I don't know if this person plays online, but most of the time, this move usually means you have the naked ace of the suit (At best) and none of the suit at all (At worst). You have outs to the third nuts, and of course, the gutshot SF draw. As I said, a hand which has you drawing only to the SF (Or runner-runner boat/quads) probably checks and lets you try to catch up and/or fire at the pot. This, to me, means you're drawing live at the very least.I say call.

#4 Vade

Vade

    Forum Shopkeeper

  • Members
  • 3,864 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Milwaukee, WI
  • Interests:Poker, Sports, Movies

Posted 27 March 2005 - 09:16 PM

The problem is it's outs to the 3rd nutsAKo is a hand that would require a lot of thought to call a big reraise with for a good player (good players aren't nearly as in love with it)AKo is also a good hand to move in, because it forces your opponents to a test.You've gotta call 70 to win 127That's what? About 1.8-1 Not exactly great pot oddsI may be wrong though :D
Last night I stayed up late playing poker with Tarot cards. I got a full house and four people died.

#5 tskillz187

tskillz187

    Great Tiger, you're next!

  • Members
  • 6,131 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Brockport/Buffalo, NY

Posted 27 March 2005 - 09:58 PM

I would drop those queens and curse under my breath, i feel like you can only be beating one hand JJ with the J of hearts. I think the only reasonable hands he has could be 99 1010 or AK and the killer would be AK with A of hearts. Those all seem like reasonable hands to take such a large time to think about and then call a big raise. What hand can you beat at this point? I doubt a tight aggressive and somewhat tricky player would raise utg, then call a big reraise, only to hope for a scary board, he has to put you on a premium hand, ak aa kk or qq with that reraise and all of those hands would likely call the all in with the exception of qq. I think he was hoping you had a big pair and were married to it , so you would call the all in.
Naismith (2:56:11 PM): fuckerflakeoutonmystakingnowmakingmillions

#6 CavemanDoctor

CavemanDoctor

    Poker Forum Regular

  • Members
  • 195 posts
  • Location:Texas

Posted 27 March 2005 - 11:04 PM

Agree with above posts.His move really reeks of PP to me. At least that's what I've noticed with the quick all-in move online. 99, TT, and AK seem the most likely, like someone said. I don't see him calling (especially if he's fairly tight) your large raise PF with anything else. And to be honest, I don't think his AK would include the A of hearts. You said he's capable of some tricks; I don't see him going all in quickly with AK (A being hearts).I'd fold.

#7 looshle

looshle

    Poker Forum Veteran

  • Members
  • 5,236 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Connecticut

Posted 27 March 2005 - 11:09 PM

I put him on AK and with that move he's definately got the A :D . He may have AQ but there's no way you can call.

#8 akishore

akishore

    Poker Forum Veteran

  • Members
  • 6,228 posts
  • Location:Cambridge (Boston), MA
  • Interests:Poker, jazz, programming, taekwondo, rock climbing, movies, etc.

Posted 28 March 2005 - 07:49 AM

come on, let me see some more responses. i'll post my thoughts, move and results, as well as what i think currently, after a few more responses. thanks to those who have replied.aseem

#9 Wilderness

Wilderness

    Poker Forum Groupie

  • Members
  • 598 posts
  • Location:Washington DC

Posted 28 March 2005 - 08:29 AM

I fold.You are getting less than 2-1 on your money, and let's think about what hands he likely holds at this point. I believe he probably has AK, possibly with A :) ; KK, 1010, 99, Ax with A :D . I don't think you are getting good enough odds against any of these hands, and are in a lot of trouble with A :D K. Against a made flush, if its not the nut flush, you have a chance but its not good.What hands are you beating? JJ with J of hearts, AJ with one of them hearts, or a bluff ... I just don't think you have the odds to call, especially given his likely holdings.
Jason

#10 gobears

gobears

    Poker Forum Veteran

  • Members
  • 6,082 posts
  • Location:Los Gatos, CA

Posted 28 March 2005 - 10:08 AM

You're getting 1.8 to 1 on your call. Your only sure out is the J of hearts; all your other outs could be dead.AK seems to be the most likely holding. AQ is possible although if he's tight, I would think that he would have folded to your raise. JJ, 10 10 are also possible. I think that you're behind and I would lay this down.
Work to live, don't live to work - Todd Harrison

#11 akishore

akishore

    Poker Forum Veteran

  • Members
  • 6,228 posts
  • Location:Cambridge (Boston), MA
  • Interests:Poker, jazz, programming, taekwondo, rock climbing, movies, etc.

Posted 28 March 2005 - 10:36 AM

ok, i expected most of these responses.here is what my thinking was in the moment:1. there is an overcard on the board.2. the board is three-suited and i'm not drawing to the nut flush, so my flush draw is probably no good (i.e. i could be up against some A :club: ).3. my gutshot is most likely useless, or i am only drawing to one out.4. i could be drawing to running outs if i'm against a made flush.based on these reasons, i folded in 10 seconds. it sucked, but i thought it was an easy fold.however, the more i think about this hand, the more i feel that i should have called. yes, almost all of you said fold, and calling here seems stupid, but let me explain.he would not have AA or KK. he would not have taken so long to think pre-flop (it was past the point of acting IMO) and i also knew he doesn't slowplay big pairs pre-flop (i.e. he would not smooth-call my reraise). i reasonably concluded that i was NOT up against an overpair (aces) or a set of kings.i also mistakenly assumed that i might be up against an A :club: . the only hands he would have with this card would be AKo or AQo/AJo/ATo/A9o. the only possible suited ace would be AJs. he wouldn't call my reraise with any other suited ace, and he wouldn't hesitate so much with AKo (granted, you all wouldn't know this, but i know that he thinks of AKo as a premium hand rather than a drawing hand, and he wouldn't fold to a reraise). based on this, IF he has the A :D , he either has a flush (AJs) or is drawing ONLY to the flush (AKo is not a possibility, but AQo/AJo/ATo are possible). i would be drawing nearly dead to AJs, but i would be ahead of AQo/AJo/ATo.finally, consider what hands i could possibly be up against:1. made flush. only realistically possible with A :) J :club: . against this, i am drawing very slim. however, this is extremely unlikely. his move on the flop just doesn't make any sense, and he would not instantly push with the nuts here, overbetting the pot.2. nut flush draw with A :club: . as i explained above, the worst case that i ruled out would be AKo (pair of kings and nut flush draw) which has me drawing slim, but not as bad as case 1. a more likely case is that my pair is good right now against either a pair of tens/nines or against simply ace-high.3. a set. i ruled out kings, but tens and nines are possible. against this, my flush draw and gutshot draw are both good, plus i'm drawing to a higher set. not a bad draw at all.4. a straight. not likely. QJo is not a raising hand for a tight-aggressive player.5. a pair. tens and nines are unlikely, but kings are possible. however, the only case of kings that has me in bad shape is with the A :club: , and i explained why i ruled out AKo (he would not consider folding to my reraise). if he has a pair of kings and my queens are no good, than my flush draw and gutshot draw are good. plus, unless he has KQ, a real possibility, i also have two outs to a set.6. a bluff. jacks are a possibility, but i can't think of any other hand which he might consider bluffing with. even with jacks, i don't think he would make a stupid push on such a scary board, even if he had the J :club: . he has to worry about being up against a higher heart and/or an overpair or a pair of kings.i hope you can see that against MOST of these cases, i am not in such bad shape. why? POT ODDS. i was getting about 1.8-to-1 on my money, so it's a correct call if i'm more than 35% to win the hand at showdown. am i? let's compare my hand to the reasonable hands i might be up against.A :club: J :club: - 2%. worst possible case.A :D K :) / A :D A :D - 21%. worst possible realistic case.A :) Q :) - 51%.A :D J :) / A :) T :club: / A :club: 9 :club: - 56%.KK - 35%.TT / 99 - 42%.KQ - 39%.KJ - 44%. (43% if it's a J :club: .)against any other hands, i'm pretty much a coinflip or a significant favorite.now, let's eliminate the hands we think are unlikely. the made flush is unlikely, so we're almost never a 2% dog. AKo or AA is also unlikely based on my pre-flop read, so we're probably not a 20% dog. however, even IF my read is wrong and he's tricking me with aces or AKo (both with the ace of hearts), i am not in terrible shape. against ALL other possible hands i could put him on, the pot is offering me the right price to call!only the WORST possible realistic case (which i can reasonably rule out) has me calling without the proper pot odds, but against ALL other holdings, i have the correct pot odds to call.i strongly believe that i should have made the call, because it was a cash game and i had the proper odds against almost all of the hands i could reasonably put him on.it turned out that he had a set of tens, to which i was roughly 42% to win at showdown. considering that the pot was offering me nearly 2-to-1 and i was a 2-to-3 underdog, a call would have been profitable.key concept #2: pot odds are hugely important. even if you're behind in the hand, a call can be correct if you're getting the right price. i knew that in most cases i was behind, but even then, i wasn't behind enough to justify folding when i was getting pretty good odds.what really annoys me in the present is the lack of time i took during the hand to reasonably arrive at my conclusion. in almost any big hand, i take my time to consider where i am in the hand, but for a few stupid reasons, i just figured i was beat and folded. i never considered that if my pair wasn't good, my flush+gutshot draw almost always was, and that if my draws weren't good, then my pair probably was.so conclusion: i should have called. let me know if you still disagree or if you have any questions. i hope this hand teaches everyone a few lessons, it definitely did so to me. this is a great example of a hand that looks easy on the outside but actually is very complex.enjoy,aseem

#12 Swift_Psycho

Swift_Psycho

    Poker Forum Veteran

  • Members
  • 4,889 posts

Posted 28 March 2005 - 10:58 AM

I probably fold, all the while muttering angrily. Just my take.

#13 Emptyeye

Emptyeye

    Poker Forum Veteran

  • Members
  • 1,136 posts

Posted 28 March 2005 - 11:04 AM

Well, I was right, though your thinking went several levels beyond mine. :lol:Amusing I didn't think of pot odds, given I watch enough WPT and Sexton is always going on about "Well, he's got the right price to call; even though he's behind, he's getting 2-to-1 on his money blah blah blah...".Something else to consider: It's a cash game. You can (presumably) rebuy. I don't know if you play with these people regularly, but calling here also sends a message, perhaps "Don't try and bluff me off of a scary board", or perhaps "I get married to my pocket pairs" (Depending on how your opponents choose to interpret it), but your opponents will remember it either way. If it turns out you lose (Or even if you win), consider the call an investment, and use the information you've projected to your advantage later on.

#14 rollito

rollito

    Poker Forum Regular

  • Members
  • 244 posts

Posted 28 March 2005 - 11:05 AM

i still think you should fold because you made a pretty big bet preflop and he could have been ponedering a call with ako.....i just think that in too many cases you are dominated and in really bad shape....as you said it was fairly early in the night so how much info did you really have on this guy(had you played with him before?).....anyways i think its a spot where a fold is better than a call.....can you really be certain he didnt have ak with the ah that early in the night?

#15 justblaze

justblaze

    Poker Forum Veteran

  • Members
  • 4,430 posts

Posted 28 March 2005 - 11:06 AM

lol aseem i was about to post "im putting him on a set of 10s trying to knock off a flush draw" before i decided to read your results post.

#16 Guest_Anonymous_*

Guest_Anonymous_*
  • Guests

Posted 28 March 2005 - 11:07 AM

THAT HAS TO BE THE EASIEST FOLD EVER, YOU DONT EVEN HAVE A ACE OF HEARTS, NOT TO MENTION YOU NEED ANOTHER HEART FOR A FLUSH, NOT TO MENTION THERE IS A OVER PAIR ON THE BOARD THE THE UTG IS A SOLID PLAYER....WHY THE HELL DID YOU EVEN POST THIS HAND FOLD IT AND GET ONTO THE NEXT HAND, IF YOUR EVEN THINKING OF CALLING HERE YOU SHOULD NOT BE ALLOWED TO PLAY POKER.

#17 obs

obs

    Poker Forum Nut

  • Members
  • 276 posts
  • Location:3/6

Posted 28 March 2005 - 11:07 AM

The pot is laying you almost 2-1. Like you said, he most likely does not have AA or KK. AK, AQ, QQ, JJ, or TT are the only hands I would realistically put him on. AK or a set the most likely. Call this.

#18 jonnyhockey

jonnyhockey

    Poker Forum Nut

  • Members
  • 401 posts
  • Location:Toronto, Canada

Posted 28 March 2005 - 11:16 AM

Good post.Based on your reads of this guy, a call does seem like the right move. Just curious why you didn't take your time at the table though? Do you usually rush into these things? I understand you can't take 2-3 weeks to decide when seated, but I think if there's anything you should be a little upset with yourself about, it should be the amount of time you took in folding.

#19 justblaze

justblaze

    Poker Forum Veteran

  • Members
  • 4,430 posts

Posted 28 March 2005 - 11:32 AM

BigSkiRace said:

THAT HAS TO BE THE EASIEST FOLD EVER, YOU DONT EVEN HAVE A ACE OF HEARTS, NOT TO MENTION YOU NEED ANOTHER HEART FOR A FLUSH, NOT TO MENTION THERE IS A OVER PAIR ON THE BOARD THE THE UTG IS A SOLID PLAYER....WHY THE HELL DID YOU EVEN POST THIS HAND FOLD IT AND GET ONTO THE NEXT HAND, IF YOUR EVEN THINKING OF CALLING HERE YOU SHOULD NOT BE ALLOWED TO PLAY POKER.
HAHAHA given the range of hands villain could be on and the odds being offered by the pot it seems like the most +EV decision is in fact a call. but what do i know, im just going by math. im sure you have a much better system for evaluating numbers-based games decisions?

#20 tskillz187

tskillz187

    Great Tiger, you're next!

  • Members
  • 6,131 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Brockport/Buffalo, NY

Posted 28 March 2005 - 11:40 AM

If you were reasonably sure that he did not have AK I think that a call is correct everytime. That is the only hand that is crippling ou given the fact that you ruled out AA and KK. Your post brings a problem I have with many online places, sometimes you just dont get enough time to think before you are out of time. In a live game, I would just sit there and get in the tank for a good two minutes all the while trying to pick up a read on him. Just another reason I enjoy B&M more than online. Good post, next time make that call!
Naismith (2:56:11 PM): fuckerflakeoutonmystakingnowmakingmillions




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users