Fenxis 99 Posted October 23, 2006 Share Posted October 23, 2006 Methodolgy: Summed up the fantasy pts per game of the top 9 forwards and top 6 defence on each team. Goalies is the sum of the GAA of the top two goalies on each FCHL team. Note that the points used reflect NHL games (not FCHL) and all points that are aquired by the player, not team. note:Due to the joys of scripting I should be able to rerun at will (as long as my roster files are up-to-date).Oct 24: bitten by a cut-and-paste error, update: Power Rankings Forwards: 1. rmunro, 7.412 2. ajs510, 7.256 3. mapleleafs, 7.254 4. mapleleafpoker, 7.030 5. rinswun, 6.854 6. tulane, 6.783 7. daveyg, 6.357 8. broadway, 5.985 9. mrdannyg, 5.98010. fenxis, 5.35811. ottawa_biatch, 5.21412. nell789, 4.690Defence: 1. mrdannyg, 2.670 2. rinswun, 2.076 3. ottawa_biatch, 2.003 4. mapleleafs, 2.000 5. ajs510, 1.973 6. broadway, 1.946 7. fenxis, 1.812 8. daveyg, 1.727 9. tulane, 1.69610. nell789, 1.66711. mapleleafpoker, 1.53712. rmunro, 1.525Goalies: 1. fenxis, 3.750 2. rinswun, 4.556 3. daveyg, 4.750 4. nell789, 5.083 5. mrdannyg, 5.250 6. mapleleafpoker, 5.500 7. mapleleafs, 5.804 8. rmunro, 6.069 9. ottawa_biatch, 6.10710. ajs510, 6.69411. tulane, 7.26812. broadway, 7.556Rankings: 1. rinswun 9 2. mapleleafs 14 3. mrdannyg 15 4. ajs510 17 5. fenxis 18 6. daveyg 18 7. rmunro 21 8. mapleleafpoker 21 9. ottawa_biatch 2310. nell789 2611. tulane 2612. broadway 26 Link to post Share on other sites
mrdannyg 274 Posted October 23, 2006 Share Posted October 23, 2006 nice work - still amazing how broadway is 0-7, since he had the consensus best preseason team. oh well, i'm sure he'll win a few games (against me).i'm pretty happy being 4th or so, since i feel like i have the 3rd-6th best team or so.i've got 3 good goalies, and better than average ability to field full rosters, so if anything, these power rankings will underrate me. Link to post Share on other sites
TulaneFlyr 0 Posted October 23, 2006 Share Posted October 23, 2006 I object to the methodology Of course my team is going to LOOK like it sucks. Buffalo goes off for 9 goals on Philadelphia's soon to be former franchise goalie Chico Esche on a NON-LEAGUE night, and that debacle factors heavily into my rankings? I think there should also be an "intangibles" factor, where you rate which team is moving upwards and downwards, especially related to roster moves. I think that my forsberg for Kovalchuk trade would definately put me high on the intangibles chart! Finally, why am I not 4b? I beat Nell heads up, I should be above him in the rankings I can understand Rins being ahead because of his record . . . .but cmon! Same record you go to head to head. .. . I am firmly in 4bth place Link to post Share on other sites
Fenxis 99 Posted October 23, 2006 Author Share Posted October 23, 2006 I object to the methodology Of course my team is going to LOOK like it sucks. Buffalo goes off for 9 goals on Philadelphia's soon to be former franchise goalie Chico Esche on a NON-LEAGUE night, and that debacle factors heavily into my rankings? I think there should also be an "intangibles" factor, where you rate which team is moving upwards and downwards, especially related to roster moves. I think that my forsberg for Kovalchuk trade would definately put me high on the intangibles chart! Finally, why am I not 4b? I beat Nell heads up, I should be above him in the rankings I can understand Rins being ahead because of his record . . . .but cmon! Same record you go to head to head. .. . I am firmly in 4bth place 1. Methodology: True, but I want to make my life easier. I'm already downloading the NHL stats to figure out my lineups so this wasn't a whole lot more.2. Intangibles: True, but this is a script so I don't want to get into that detail. In the next version I'll also look at factoring in GP somehow to lessen / eliminate the factor of hot callups and/or injury prone players.3. 4b?: That's the order the script told me! Link to post Share on other sites
rinswun 6 Posted October 23, 2006 Share Posted October 23, 2006 Methodolgy: Summed up the fantasy pts per game of the top 9 forwards and top 6 defence on each team. Goalies is the sum of the GAA of the top two goalies on each FCHL team. Note that the points used reflect NHL games (not FCHL) and all points that are aquired by the player, not team. note:Due to the joys of scripting I should be able to rerun at will (as long as my roster files are up-to-date).In (forward rank)/(defence rank)/(goalie rank) format:Power Rankings 1. mapleleafs - 1/3/10 (5-2-0)2. broadway - 2/1/12 (0-7-0)3. mapleleafpoker - 3/2/11 (3-4-0)A tightly knit lead group all having similar characteristics, expect movement in the next report. All have top of the line scoring (forwards / defence) but have league worst goaltending to back them up.4a. rinswun - 6/5/7 (6-1-0)4b. nell789 - 5/4/9 (3-4-0)4c. tulane - 4/6/8 (3-4-0)7. mrdannyg - 8/8/5 (3-4-0)8. ottawa_biatch - 7/7/6 (3-3-1)Strong balanced teams, not excelling in any categories.9. daveg - 9/9/4 (3-4-0)Forth best goaltending, forth worst forwards / defence10. rmunro - 10/10/3 (5-2-0)Third best goaltending, third worst forwards / defence11. ajs510 - 11/11/2 (4-3-0)Second best goaltending, second worst forwards / defence12. fenxis - 12/12/1 (3-3-1)Very best goaltending, very worst forwards / defence pah, leading the league and still no respect!run this for fchl nights only and i would imagine i would be top 3 in every category. through 7 games my goaltenders have only conceeded 13 goals! Link to post Share on other sites
Fenxis 99 Posted October 23, 2006 Author Share Posted October 23, 2006 pah, leading the league and still no respect!run this for fchl nights only and i would imagine i would be top 3 in every category. through 7 games my goaltenders have only conceeded 13 goals!Problem: I'm only downloading the team stats pages and not the game log for each player; I don't feel like looking up the web ID of a couple hundred different players!edit: Also, if there's any typos on the rosters that player won't be counted in the stats -- I did catch a few; mostly in the french names (ie missing hyphens, etc). Link to post Share on other sites
MapleLeafs 142 Posted October 23, 2006 Share Posted October 23, 2006 Power Rankings 1. mapleleafs - 1/3/10 (5-2-0)top of the line scoring (forwards / defence) 12. fenxis - 12/12/1 (3-3-1)Very best goaltending, very worst forwards / defence Since I have awesome forwards and you have awesome goaltending, lets make a deal! Link to post Share on other sites
Fenxis 99 Posted October 23, 2006 Author Share Posted October 23, 2006 Since I have awesome forwards and you have awesome goaltending, lets make a deal!My problem is that my forwards are either not scoring (and getting bunch of assists) or just plain slumping. Will have to ponder wether or not it's time to pull the trigger. Link to post Share on other sites
rinswun 6 Posted October 23, 2006 Share Posted October 23, 2006 My problem is that my forwards are either not scoring (and getting bunch of assists) or just plain slumping. Will have to ponder wether or not it's time to pull the trigger.and your defence has yet to register a single goal on fchl game nights Link to post Share on other sites
MapleLeafs 142 Posted October 23, 2006 Share Posted October 23, 2006 and your defence has yet to register a single goal on fchl game nightsWith Pronger and Zubov, I wouldn't panic on defense for the time being.Panic on offense! You need Ryan Smyth! Link to post Share on other sites
mrdannyg 274 Posted October 23, 2006 Share Posted October 23, 2006 I object to the methodology Of course my team is going to LOOK like it sucks. Buffalo goes off for 9 goals on Philadelphia's soon to be former franchise goalie Chico Esche on a NON-LEAGUE night, and that debacle factors heavily into my rankings? I think there should also be an "intangibles" factor, where you rate which team is moving upwards and downwards, especially related to roster moves. I think that my forsberg for Kovalchuk trade would definately put me high on the intangibles chart!i think his script measures the stuff that actually matters pretty well. things like giving up 9 goals on a non-league night will even out.your rankings will reflect your current roster, so in that way, they'll be a better measure of your "power" than your record, if you make a lot of moves. momentum in a league like this doesn't mean much.Jay - if you're looking for goaltending, i've got 3 solid tandems. they won't be cheap, but they'll perform. Link to post Share on other sites
MapleLeafs 142 Posted October 23, 2006 Share Posted October 23, 2006 i think his script measures the stuff that actually matters pretty well. things like giving up 9 goals on a non-league night will even out.your rankings will reflect your current roster, so in that way, they'll be a better measure of your "power" than your record, if you make a lot of moves. momentum in a league like this doesn't mean much.Jay - if you're looking for goaltending, i've got 3 solid tandems. they won't be cheap, but they'll perform.haha, I know man, I was looking at Buffalo earlier. Jersey too Link to post Share on other sites
mrdannyg 274 Posted October 23, 2006 Share Posted October 23, 2006 haha, I know man, I was looking at Buffalo earlier. Jersey tootampa bay has given up only 20 goals in 8 games, and has one of the best FCHL schedules.just sayin... (that i rule).i guess new jersey is probably the cheapest right now.your daughter ever end up beating you at chess? Link to post Share on other sites
Untilted 158 Posted October 23, 2006 Share Posted October 23, 2006 So my nightmare is real afterall.Heatley and Jokinen are getting all their points on non FCHL nights.Goal teams have been horrendous. Thought I was solid with Carolina and Rangers.Every time I have played Kunitz and Vrbata, they have scored zilch ( maybe 1 assist, but i am not sure). They are off to excellent starts except for FCHL nightsTanguay and Mara have absolutely tanked so far.Started scoring the last 2 games, but have ran in to 2 teams that exccellent offensive nights.I am officially on FCHL Tilt but I will not panic and trade my studs for aging stars or future years. I know the sharks have been circling but I have not given up on the year yet.Broadway. Link to post Share on other sites
mrdannyg 274 Posted October 23, 2006 Share Posted October 23, 2006 So my nightmare is real afterall.PM me when you're ready to give up and dump your studs fwiw - biatch is at 20, and i am at 21, so biatch should be in 7th. Link to post Share on other sites
Fenxis 99 Posted October 23, 2006 Author Share Posted October 23, 2006 PM me when you're ready to give up and dump your studs fwiw - biatch is at 20, and i am at 21, so biatch should be in 7th.Hmm.. the order is right but I quickly swapped it from total ranking to invidual ones just before leaving. I'll double check them tomorrow. Link to post Share on other sites
nell789 0 Posted October 24, 2006 Share Posted October 24, 2006 Problem: I'm only downloading the team stats pages and not the game log for each player; I don't feel like looking up the web ID of a couple hundred different players!edit: Also, if there's any typos on the rosters that player won't be counted in the stats -- I did catch a few; mostly in the french names (ie missing hyphens, etc).what is this script you're talking about? And how do you download the team stats pages? Link to post Share on other sites
Fenxis 99 Posted October 24, 2006 Author Share Posted October 24, 2006 what is this script you're talking about? And how do you download the team stats pages?Something I wrote in Perl while learning the language. Basically I can open the web page programatically and dump it to a file, then parse out the pertinent values. Link to post Share on other sites
nell789 0 Posted October 24, 2006 Share Posted October 24, 2006 Something I wrote in Perl while learning the language. Basically I can open the web page programatically and dump it to a file, then parse out the pertinent values.Perl? I've never heard of it.Is it possible to do something similar with Java? Link to post Share on other sites
Ottawa_Biatch 288 Posted October 24, 2006 Share Posted October 24, 2006 this is soooooo cool Link to post Share on other sites
ajs510 122 Posted October 24, 2006 Share Posted October 24, 2006 Not that I don't appreciate the effort put into this or anything, but I find it amusing that I have "the second worst forwards and defense" in the league, yet I've outscored nearly every (or literally *every*) other team on the last four FCHL game nights. Link to post Share on other sites
Fenxis 99 Posted October 24, 2006 Author Share Posted October 24, 2006 Perl? I've never heard of it.Is it possible to do something similar with Java?Somewhat, it's more 'glueware' for UNIX. Stands for Practical Extraction and Report Language or to some Pathologically Eclectic Rubbish Lister. Very strong support for regular expressions and string manipulation. Used to be frequently used for web cgi but I think that's been replaced with PHP nowadays.Like Java there's a huge API (that's open-source downloaded from a common website) so you leverage libraries (for db, xml, etc..).Not that I don't appreciate the effort put into this or anything, but I find it amusing that I have "the second worst forwards and defense" in the league, yet I've outscored nearly every (or literally *every*) other team on the last four FCHL game nights.I'll look into it at lunchtime - have meetings until then. I'm thinking there's some variables I need to clear out between teams that's messing things up. Link to post Share on other sites
rinswun 6 Posted October 24, 2006 Share Posted October 24, 2006 Somewhat, it's more 'glueware' for UNIX. Stands for Practical Extraction and Report Language or to some Pathologically Eclectic Rubbish Lister. Very strong support for regular expressions and string manipulation. Used to be frequently used for web cgi but I think that's been replaced with PHP nowadays.Like Java there's a huge API (that's open-source downloaded from a common website) so you leverage libraries (for db, xml, etc..).I'll look into it at lunchtime - have meetings until then. I'm thinking there's some variables I need to clear out between teams that's messing things up.did you take our whole rosters or a top 6/4 selection?if it was a just a top six then the fact that sykora who's been my most productive member would likely not be counted as he's my cheapest player is obviously gonna affect the results. if not then the fact that johnson and barker havent played yet his year (and wont in the case of johnson) is obviously gonna hinder results too. its those intangibles that lead me to think its more a measure of the rosters strength overall than actual power ranking in the FCHL. its obviously rediculous to have a team thats 0-7 as the second best team in the power ranking for instance. somehow we need to come up with a script that can quickly and easily sort these things for game days only - any offers?! :Pthat said, i appreciate the effort Fenxis and its certainly interesting to see! Link to post Share on other sites
Fenxis 99 Posted October 24, 2006 Author Share Posted October 24, 2006 did you take our whole rosters or a top 6/4 selection?its obviously rediculous to have a team thats 0-7 as the second best team in the power ranking for instance.9 forwards, 6 def, 2 goalies (top being having the highest FCHL points per game) -- you might want to recheck the standings with my update.note: full output on the fchl boards for people to check their teams. Link to post Share on other sites
digitalmonkey 929 Posted October 24, 2006 Share Posted October 24, 2006 Anyone need a logo? I made this for anyone that wants it... Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now