simo_8ball, on Monday, November 20th, 2006, 10:25 AM, said:
Answer To Quizz Question #21
Started by DanielNegreanu, Oct 17 2006 09:49 PM
29 replies to this topic
#21
Posted 20 November 2006 - 10:32 AM
Now you're getting it. See if this was 22, you'd be fine calling. 22 is a pair, and therefore a made hand.
#23
Posted 20 December 2006 - 02:16 PM
petersun, on Wednesday, December 20th, 2006, 4:36 PM, said:
Because AK is a made hand against QJ.
#24
Posted 21 December 2006 - 01:03 PM
simo_8ball, on Wednesday, December 20th, 2006, 2:16 PM, said:
But it's only ace high. How can ace high be a made hand? You haven't 'made' anything. Remember that. How often do you see players call off all their chips on a draw? Don't be one of them.
#25
Posted 21 December 2006 - 06:31 PM
petersun, on Thursday, December 21st, 2006, 9:03 PM, said:
A made hand is one which currently wins over another hand if the showdown was made with no more cards showing. I don't need to draw to anything, I win right now without seeing another card.Let's take another example:Do you prefer 22 vs KQ or AK vs KQ? Both 22 and AK are made hands over KQ. However, you prefer to have AK rather than 22. AK is more "made" than 22.
#26
Posted 22 December 2006 - 01:04 PM
simo_8ball, on Thursday, December 21st, 2006, 6:31 PM, said:
I wasn't being serious. Just so you know. 
#27
Posted 24 December 2006 - 10:12 AM
shpaget, on Monday, November 20th, 2006, 1:22 PM, said:
Of course...I keep forgetting that AK isn't a made hand...even against QJ.
___________
Wave upon wave of Demented Avengers march cheerfully out of obscurity into the dream.
Wave upon wave of Demented Avengers march cheerfully out of obscurity into the dream.
#29
Posted 04 January 2007 - 07:21 PM
This year was my first World Series of Poker. I sat at that table scared @#%less for 9 hours. The best hands i saw were 99 and AK, played them both so poorly I cringe everytime i look back and wonder what could have been. 9000 people? Phil Ivey AND Gus Hansen at my table? No question i'm taking the gamble right then and there, at least that way I've got some ammo that can threaten Phil and Gus and if i have a good starting hand i can employ a "kill phil" strategy against them without risking my tournament life. $10,000 is a lot of green to put in play for the average college student (or regular person, i guess) but the lesson i learned for next year's WSOP, and of more immediate importance the WPT event at Borgata... is that it's a tournament, the buy in is history, might as well play to win!Phil
#30
Posted 19 February 2007 - 05:49 PM
Why on earth would anyone think it would be a better call with 22? With AK, you already have QJ beat. To beat you, they would have to catch at least a Q or J. NOW, say they were to catch a Q or J on the flop, if you had 22, you would have significantly less outs to improve on the turn or river, you only have 2 more 2s to make trips. With AK, however, you have 3 As and 3 Kings left in the deck, so you have a far better chance to draw out and beat the QJ on the turn or river.If you were to know your odds, 22 against QJ is actually the slightest underdog. QJ wins that race just over 52% of the time.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users









