Clinton Rattled On Fox News

[HOUSTONRAISE 0]

lol. that was good. good job chris wallace. he was squirmin.

[ricker 0]

care to expand on your topic? Maybe pray tell, exactly how was Clinton rattled?

[BigDMcGee 3,367]

and this is poker related.. how?Off topic is there for a reason.

[WhiteSpade 0]

and this is poker related.. how?Off topic is there for a reason.

Just give him a second. Clinton may have been caught playing strip poker with a few escorts or something

[HOUSTONRAISE 0]

well he did gamble with american lives as we were attacked four times by bin laden under his watch, and he passed on the opportunity take him down when he had the chance. now he's trying to cover his *** and gets all rattled when asked about it. neither did Bush do enough on bid laden either by the way.

[LongLiveYorke 38]

With absolutely no information from the OP, this should turn into an interesting and meaningful discussion.

[digitalmonkey 929]

[keith crime 8]

nah then it would have said Clinton stoned on Fox tv

[76clubs 0]

WHAT IN THE HELL WAS CLINTON THINKING GOING ON FOX NEWS?

[BigDMcGee 3,367]

WHAT IN THE HELL WAS CLINTON THINKING GOING ON FOX NEWS?

Does he have a new book to sell?

[doublemeup 0]

Does he have a new book to sell?

Maybe a new library to promote.

[brvheart 1,768]

Just in the interest of not having another completely worthless thread (thanks to you OP)... here is the link.

[HOUSTONRAISE 0]

thanks for the link. it's fun to see him squirm again. i've neer seen him so rattled. usually he's a smooth cat. wallace really got under his skin. if he wasn't so self conscious about it, he wouldn't have reacted that way. his legacy is one thing he takes seriously, and when it is threatened he fights like a rabid dog.

[LongLiveYorke 38]

I enjoy watching former politicians. They get to be actual humans. The phrasing of the question was as follows:"Why didn't you do more to put Bin Laden and Al Qaeda out of business when you were President."He then goes on to describe a few incidents that took place under Clinton's Presidency that, in his opinion, should have inspired Clinton to take more action against Bin Laden.Clinton becomes noticeably irritated by this line of questioning and claims that the Fox News network doesn't hold the other side (the current administration) to the same standards of scrutiny and questioning that they hold him to.This is all fine and expected from both sides.Flustered as he was, though, I think Clinton did a good job of answering the questions point by point and defending himself. He would have gone on for hours and hours if he wasn't repeatedly interrupted. This is why tv talk shows are for the most part terrible. This is an extremely complicated issue and worthy of a much larger discussion.I thought he defended himself very well and was quite honest.

[strategy 4]

This is why tv talk shows are for the most part terrible. This is an extremely complicated issue and worthy of a much larger discussion.

Couldn't agree more. Nicely put.

[TheCorporation3 0]

Our own government is responsible for all of this, watch loose change man, you'll get the picture.

[LongLiveYorke 38]

Our own government is responsible for all of this, watch loose change man, you'll get the picture.

Oh boy. Here we go again.

[brvheart 1,768]

Our own government is responsible for all of this, watch loose change man, you'll get the picture.

Ban?check.

Oh boy. Here we go again.

nh.

[TheCorporation3 0]

Oh boy. Here we go again.

Joke...you're supposed to laugh, lol. And BAN? I don't deserve a ban for trying to express things people are unaware of!

[LongLiveYorke 38]

Joke...you're supposed to laugh, lol. And BAN? I don't deserve a ban for trying to express things people are unaware of!

If it's a joke, then I take it back. I'm just desensitized to it after certain people on this forum insist on bringing it up again and again and again.

[brvheart 1,768]

If it's a joke, then I take it back. I'm just desensitized to it after certain people on this forum insist on bringing it up again and again and again.

9/11 is a lie.

Joke...you're supposed to laugh, lol. And BAN? I don't deserve a ban for trying to express things people are unaware of!

ban.

[pokerkid 0]

Flustered as he was, though, I think Clinton did a good job of answering the questions point by point and defending himself. He would have gone on for hours and hours if he wasn't repeatedly interrupted. This is why tv talk shows are for the most part terrible. This is an extremely complicated issue and worthy of a much larger discussion.I thought he defended himself very well and was quite honest.

QFT. Couldn't agree more.

[_Great_Dane_ 0]

and this is poker related.. how?Off topic is there for a reason.

He was bluffing.

[TheCorporation3 0]

If it's a joke, then I take it back. I'm just desensitized to it after certain people on this forum insist on bringing it up again and again and again.

But on a serious note, have you seen "loose change?"

[Zeatrix 0]

I'm a swede and so should have a more objective mind when it comes to issues like this than most americans. I thought Clinton defended himself very well. I did not get the feeling he was rattled, but that he strongly defended himself, which of course should be expected.I've also seen loose change and though it brings up some valid points, I at least feel as if some points are very vague and outright not valid. For example, the film tries to prove that the buildings contained explosives by pointing out eruptions below the falling towers. Anyone can imagine that the interior of the building could be colapsing faster than the exterior causing these "premature" eruptions. Just one of many iffy "proof" in the film.