Party Poker 2/4 Hold'em (9 handed) converterPreflop: Hero is UTG with [J :spade: ], [A :spade: ]. Hero raises, SB calls, BB calls, Hero calls, MP3 calls.Flop: (15 SB) [5 :club: ], [6 :spade: ], [5 :spade: ] (5 players)SB checks, BB checks, Hero checks, MP3 checks, CO bets, CO calls, SB calls.Turn: (14 BB) [6 :diamond: ] (3 players)SB checks, Hero checks, CO bets, SB folds, Hero calls.River: (16 BB) [K :diamond: ] (2 players)Hero checks, CO checks.Final Pot: 16 BBreads: CO was solid and unimaginative SB was a dolt BB also seemed solid but passivewhich leads me to a couple of questions. Was raising utg with AJ suited too aggressive and did I have enough pot equity to cap the flop, and with my reads was I correct on each street
ajs utg
Started by KDawgCometh, Mar 23 2005 06:02 PM
5 replies to this topic
#2
Posted 23 March 2005 - 06:40 PM
I like it.It's a scary board, but given the action preflop/flop i'm assuming he's hot AA-QQ.Capping looks like +EV to me. 33.3333% of the money is yours, 35% of the time you win. It's not a big edge, but an A may win it for you.
back for kramit
#3
Posted 23 March 2005 - 06:48 PM
Yeah. Here is my though process on capping this here. His range of hands could very well be AK, AA, KK, AQs, QQ, JJ, or 1010 even( I think he'd threebet PF and threebet my CR with an overpair on this flop). So against AA I need the flush. KK, QQ, JJ I need the Ace. AK I need the jack and hope a K doesn't fall. Same goes for AQ with obviously hoping the Q doesn't fall. Against 1010 I need either the Jack or the A. So given the range of hands I felt the Ace was good for one out(maybe even a .5 out here) and teh Jack would be good for 1 out. So I figured with 11 or 10.5 outs This might work. I still dunno, I want to heqar from as many as possbile. The results don't matter as its obvious I didn't hit the flush which was my main draw
Wine Notes for those that care about such pretentious things
#4
Posted 23 March 2005 - 09:24 PM
Your thinking is not flawed.nice hand.
back for kramit
#5
Posted 23 March 2005 - 09:35 PM
I like the check-raise here, especially given the results.But maybe you could help with this...Is the check raise on this flop more +EV than leading out on it.My first instinct here was to lead the flop. Why is this poor?Was the point of the C/R to get the SB and BB in for one bet from the CO instead of having to call 2 cold from your bet then his raise (I am assuming he would raise if you lead). Anyway I like the move on the flop, I guess it just wasn't obvious to me. Any further explanation you could give here would probably be of great benefit to me, seeing as how I think I misplay overcards with flush draws in big pots.
#6
Posted 23 March 2005 - 09:44 PM
Absolute said:
I like the check-raise here, especially given the results.But maybe you could help with this...Is the check raise on this flop more +EV than leading out on it.My first instinct here was to lead the flop. Why is this poor?Was the point of the C/R to get the SB and BB in for one bet from the CO instead of having to call 2 cold from your bet then his raise (I am assuming he would raise if you lead). Anyway I like the move on the flop, I guess it just wasn't obvious to me. Any further explanation you could give here would probably be of great benefit to me, seeing as how I think I misplay overcards with flush draws in big pots.
Wine Notes for those that care about such pretentious things
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users









