125 replies to this topic

[Actuary]

krup24, on Thursday, September 28th, 2006, 7:46 AM, said:

really?details?

yes really.Inappropriate conduct on multiple occasions.That's about as detailed as I know and/or feel is my place to say.I think he was good for strategy and enthusiastic; albeit, a bit hostile, and too new to get away with it, perhaps.

[crazyplaya6]

Actuary, on Thursday, September 28th, 2006, 7:57 AM, said:

yes really.Inappropriate conduct on multiple occasions.That's about as detailed as I know and/or feel is my place to say.I think he was good for strategy and enthusiastic; albeit, a bit hostile, and too new to get away with it, perhaps.

sw?

[Actuary]

crazyplaya6, on Thursday, September 28th, 2006, 1:36 PM, said:

sw?

which part?

[bascomeb]

Zach6668, on Thursday, September 28th, 2006, 2:11 PM, said:

His sentence still doesn't make any sense.The best part is that he made whatever mistake he made in two seperate posts.

hahah yea that is rather funny. I'm not that dumb. I did mean to say they instead of that. My grammar isnt very good and I dont really overlook what I type that often. Sorry for that

[Zach6668]

It all makes sense now

[bascomeb]

navybuttons, on Thursday, September 28th, 2006, 2:21 PM, said:

the thread is not worth finding. the only important part of the thread was when i said that the goal of most tournaments (more specifically, SNG's) was not showing down a hand. bas said it couldn't be done, which caused me to play 100 $1 sng's wtih my cards covered (i taped paper onto the screen). i finished with a positive ROI. (slight brag)

that is pretty sweet and job well done on that... But you missed the point that we were discussing was a multitable tournament field and not a STT. To make it through a field with thousands of players w/o showing down a hand isn't possible for a +ROI