Jump to content

Who Plays This Differently?


Recommended Posts

Does anyone save the river bets?PokerStars Game #6346820239: Tournament #32191504, $32+$3 Razz Limit - Level IV (60/120) - 2006/09/19 - 19:36:54 (ET)Table '32191504 1' 8-maxSeat 1: Weisshaupt (1281 in chips) Seat 2: ! JP 1950 ! (858 in chips) Seat 3: NOFX_PUNK (1680 in chips) Seat 4: motox245 (2103 in chips) Seat 5: ILE4EV (1784 in chips) Seat 6: bdubs3737 (1468 in chips) Seat 7: CashCookie (1430 in chips) Seat 8: the wa®den (1396 in chips) Weisshaupt: posts the ante 12! JP 1950 !: posts the ante 12NOFX_PUNK: posts the ante 12motox245: posts the ante 12ILE4EV: posts the ante 12bdubs3737: posts the ante 12CashCookie: posts the ante 12the wa®den: posts the ante 12*** 3rd STREET ***Dealt to Weisshaupt [Ac]Dealt to ! JP 1950 ! [As]Dealt to NOFX_PUNK [5c 3d Ah]Dealt to motox245 [4d]Dealt to ILE4EV [5s]Dealt to bdubs3737 [Qc]Dealt to CashCookie [8s]Dealt to the wa®den [Td]bdubs3737: brings-in low 18CashCookie: folds the wa®den: folds Weisshaupt: calls 18! JP 1950 !: calls 18NOFX_PUNK: raises 42 to 60motox245: calls 60ILE4EV: calls 60bdubs3737: folds Weisshaupt: calls 42! JP 1950 !: folds *** 4th STREET ***Dealt to Weisshaupt [Ac] [Tc]Dealt to NOFX_PUNK [5c 3d Ah] [2c]Dealt to motox245 [4d] [8h]Dealt to ILE4EV [5s] [Kd]NOFX_PUNK: bets 60motox245: calls 60ILE4EV: calls 60Weisshaupt: calls 60*** 5th STREET ***Dealt to Weisshaupt [Ac Tc] [6h]Dealt to NOFX_PUNK [5c 3d Ah 2c] [8d]Dealt to motox245 [4d 8h] [7c]Dealt to ILE4EV [5s Kd] [Qh]NOFX_PUNK: bets 120motox245: calls 120ILE4EV: folds Weisshaupt: calls 120*** 6th STREET ***Dealt to Weisshaupt [Ac Tc 6h] [6d]Dealt to NOFX_PUNK [5c 3d Ah 2c 8d] [Kc]Dealt to motox245 [4d 8h 7c] [8c]NOFX_PUNK: bets 120motox245: calls 120Weisshaupt: calls 120*** RIVER ***Dealt to NOFX_PUNK [5c 3d Ah 2c 8d Kc] [Jd]NOFX_PUNK: bets 120motox245: calls 120Weisshaupt: raises 120 to 240NOFX_PUNK: raises 120 to 360motox245: folds Weisshaupt: raises 120 to 480Betting is cappedNOFX_PUNK: calls 120*** SHOW DOWN ***Weisshaupt: shows [2s 7s Ac Tc 6h 6d 4h] (Lo: 7,6,4,2,A)NOFX_PUNK: shows [5c 3d Ah 2c 8d Kc Jd] (Lo: 8,5,3,2,A)Weisshaupt collected 2412 from pot*** SUMMARY ***Total pot 2412 | Rake 0 Seat 1: Weisshaupt showed [2s 7s Ac Tc 6h 6d 4h] and won (2412) with Lo: 7,6,4,2,ASeat 2: ! JP 1950 ! folded on the 3rd StreetSeat 3: NOFX_PUNK showed [5c 3d Ah 2c 8d Kc Jd] and lost with Lo: 8,5,3,2,ASeat 4: motox245 folded on the RiverSeat 5: ILE4EV folded on the 5th StreetSeat 6: bdubs3737 folded on the 3rd StreetSeat 7: CashCookie folded on the 3rd Street (didn't bet)Seat 8: the wa®den folded on the 3rd Street (didn't bet)

Link to post
Share on other sites

In my opinion with 8-low and knowing the villain is looking to make or break his hand on the river, I would be inclined to check and see his reaction. If he doesn't make his hand then he will likely check back. If he does make his hand he will likely bet and you could easily make that call.Without knowing more about the players involved or any possible reads you might have, I think the check-call would have been the best route with 8 low. All the 8s were out on the board or dead, so he is pretty much chasing a 7 considering you were showed to be coming down on an 8 yourself. Perhaps I am a little more cautious than some, however.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Im ok with the bet on 7th because theres the 3rd player in the hand that is going to pay you off with a worse 8 like he tried to do before he got priced out by you two capping it up. Theres no way the 3rd guy can be raising with a hand that doesnt have you beat, since even if you're bluffing with nothing the guy in the middle clearly has a weak 8 made and if you dont call he certainly will and even if you do call he might so a bluff has 0 chance of working. I suppose there is a very slim chance that he made a strong 86 and is hoping you have a 6 or 7 down, but with 3 8s already dead this is unlikely. Your 3 bet is terrible since his range of hands he can have that you're beating is almost nothing and theres a decent chance he caps it (though his cap with a 76 low is a very thin raise). Since the 3rd player is in I might even fold the hand on 7th because Im that sure he cant possibly be bluffing, and I certainly wouldn't raise, most of the time I would probably make the crying call. Oh, and if for whatever reason I decide to be suicidal and I 3 bet and then he caps it over the top just fold your hand because you have 0 chance in a million that you have him beat in a $32+3 sng unless its clear that he doesnt know at all what hes doing like the people you see sometimes in the first level or 2 that are capping with pairs showing and showdown full houses, but by the 60-120 level you should know if hes one of these players or not.

Link to post
Share on other sites

to be fair he was a terrible player and I was multi tabling so the 3 bet was a reaction rather than a thought. Plus it left me with about 1k to play with. Annoyingly the same dude won another ridiculous pot putting him at like 5.5k and he sat out until 3 handed leaving me the bubble when the other short(er) stack doubled up.

Link to post
Share on other sites
i would check rasie 6th and check call 7th
checkraise isnt going to work, everyone bricked on 6th, if either of them was going to play his hand fast they would have already raised it on 5th, checking 6th just gives both of them free cards to draw out on you instead of making them pay to draw
Link to post
Share on other sites
checkraise isnt going to work, everyone bricked on 6th, if either of them was going to play his hand fast they would have already raised it on 5th, checking 6th just gives both of them free cards to draw out on you instead of making them pay to draw
i could see the made 87 (if he actually has a made 87) bet fifth if we check after pairing our 8. our check says "oops. paired my eight. i'm still drawing, guys i'm not gonna try to steal this pot anymore." if the 87 thinks we don't feel like drawing anymore, he'll bet here.if we check after hitting a nice card, it would look suspicious and they'd probably check. but i find that, especially against weaker oponnents, they can be tricked into betting (even if they still have a draw) if you check after hitting a brick telling them you've been representing more strength than you actually have the entire time, and now you've given up.
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...