tournament wwyd #6
Started by Wily, Mar 22 2005 12:04 AM
13 replies to this topic
#1
Posted 22 March 2005 - 12:04 AM
Early in a $20 NL multi-table tournament, you've amassed a decent stack of 3000 chips. Blinds are only 40/80. On the cut-off ,you're dealt A
4
. You, MP to your right (with 1900 chips) and the button to your left (with 2100 chips) call. The flop is 10
9
K
. MP to your right bets the pot with 400 chips, you raise to 800 to see where you are and to possibly buy a free card, and button to your left quickly goes all in. MP pushes all in too. If you call and lose, you still have about 900 chips left. If you win, you become the biggest stack in the tournament so far. Thoughts? I knew that my only outs would be the hearts, since a single ace could not be good against two all in hands. But I called in this case and won, and it helped me get through to the money immensely. Would you call this?
#2
Posted 22 March 2005 - 12:06 AM
What was the pot laying you?
back for kramit
#3
Posted 22 March 2005 - 12:35 AM
wrto4556 said:
What was the pot laying you?
#4
Posted 22 March 2005 - 12:35 AM
wrto4556 said:
What was the pot laying you?
#5
Posted 22 March 2005 - 02:14 PM
you have 1/3 of your stack invested. If you fold you are left with 2000 chips. If you call and loose you are left with 900. With a good chance at hitting the nuts you have to call here.edit: by the way the pot is laying you much better than 5:1 you're way off with that number.
#6
Posted 22 March 2005 - 03:46 PM
I think that yes, you need to call, but mainly because if you do, you're losing about 2/3 what you started the hand with. If you fold, you're essentially giving 1/3 away for free. Why not call for that 2nd 3rd of the stack, does this make any sense.Basically, you have the odds, but also, will either give 800 away, or call another 800 or so to make triple. (of course numbers aren't exact)
-Kurt
#7
Posted 23 March 2005 - 04:28 AM
If you want to make money in poker in the long runyou should start making this call
#8
Posted 23 March 2005 - 06:47 AM
i think it's an easy call because the pot is laying you so much and because you're already pretty pot-committed.you have to take risks in the middle stages (what this seemed to be), and you especially can't just give away 1/3 of your stack when you have a 35% draw to the nuts. plus, the pot is laying you more than 5:1, so even if you were shortstacked and would be going all-in, it would be a good all-in. you have the chance to quintuple up.aseem
#9
Posted 23 March 2005 - 06:55 AM
call......too much in the pot and even if you lose you are not in terrible shape.....your short stacked but still have enough to make a comeback....the pot odds and the chance to knock out two players is too great to fold
#10
Posted 23 March 2005 - 07:07 AM
I say you have to call based on how you played it. I am curious though how others would have played it from the git-go (ie. the poster tells us what he did and when, but I don't think anyone has critiqued the way he played it).
#11
Posted 23 March 2005 - 07:13 AM
quick question.....what happened to the small bling and the bb in this hand......if you, mp and the button all just called the bb would have the option....so he would be in the hand and the sb would be in the hand for 1/2 a bet a lot of the time too...just trying to figure out what happened to them
#12
Posted 23 March 2005 - 03:22 PM
Rocketwadster said:
I say you have to call based on how you played it. I am curious though how others would have played it from the git-go (ie. the poster tells us what he did and when, but I don't think anyone has critiqued the way he played it).
#13
Posted 23 March 2005 - 06:05 PM
Random Fluke said:
you have 1/3 of your stack invested. If you fold you are left with 2000 chips. If you call and loose you are left with 900. With a good chance at hitting the nuts you have to call here.edit: by the way the pot is laying you much better than 5:1 you're way off with that number.
#14
Posted 25 March 2005 - 03:06 AM
This one was almost too easy to be a WWYD. If you play to win, and not just to blind yourself into the bubble, you have to make this call here. The original bettor turned over K 10, and the all-in raiser to my left turned over 99 for a set of 9's. If there had only one all in-bet, this would've been a HORRIBLE call. This is pretty obvious, but alot of players in tournaments (and in NL cash games) will not drop a nut flush draw to one all in, getting horrible odds and risking their tournament life to a draw that has about the same odds as 2 7o vs AKs preflop. In this case - I did manage to hit my heart flush on the turn, and without the board pairing I tripled up and had an almost guaranteed spot on the final table if I didn't make any mistakes. I'm not a fan of playing too tight in the early and mid stages of a multi-tournament. I know there are a lot of players who do play very tight, only coming in with premium hands and trying to get a double up from beating someone else's premium hand, but I find that they are often mid to small stacked by the late stages of a tournament. That's because they miss the opportunity to pick up easy double ups from bad players' mistakes, and also the opportunity to double or trip up from drawing hands like this when the pot odds are correct. In my next post, I'll talk about suited broadway cards, which I think (when played correctly) are some of the most powerful hands in the mid-stages of a tournament.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users









