Hector 0 Posted September 5, 2006 Share Posted September 5, 2006 DNA's graphic where the rake amounts to half his winningshttp://www.fullcontactpoker.com/poker-foru...73671&st=20 Link to post Share on other sites
Royal_Tour 0 Posted September 5, 2006 Share Posted September 5, 2006 rake back good sirrake back Link to post Share on other sites
TheCorporation3 0 Posted September 5, 2006 Share Posted September 5, 2006 DNA's graphic where the rake amounts to half his winningshttp://www.fullcontactpoker.com/poker-foru...73671&st=20 That's just sick, Rakeback sucks too. because it isnt on party poker. If party had a 10% I'd devote my life to grinding out 2000 hands a day.That's just sick, Rakeback sucks too. because it isnt on party poker. If party had a 10% I'd devote my life to grinding out 2000 hands a day.By the way, the rake isn't killing me, I still maintain 2BB/100 hands, thats all I need, I'm fine with those results, TRUST ME. Link to post Share on other sites
Abbaddabba 0 Posted September 5, 2006 Share Posted September 5, 2006 Have you ever used pokertracker before?It shouldnt be shocking.At low stakes hold em, it accounts for between 2 and 2.5BB/100. By the way, the rake isn't killing me, I still maintain 2BB/100 hands, thats all I need, I'm fine with those results, TRUST ME.I'd say it is killing you. Or at least raping you.I maintain slightly better than 2BB/100 and get the equivalent of between 105-110% rakeback. Which means i effectively win about 4.5BB/100. The notion that party games are MUCH easier is a myth. My winrate dropped about .5BB/100 when making the transition to absolute. It's been well worth my while to switch. Link to post Share on other sites
kkot 0 Posted September 5, 2006 Share Posted September 5, 2006 My rake accounts for 200% of my winnings!I feel pretty retarded for not signing up for rakeback earlier. Link to post Share on other sites
dreamcrusher28 0 Posted September 5, 2006 Share Posted September 5, 2006 I made about $250 in rakeback last month without ever playing a hand higher than .25/.50 (limit) . I rakeback.Beating the snot outta the micros don't hurt too bad either. Link to post Share on other sites
spikymarv99 0 Posted September 13, 2006 Share Posted September 13, 2006 How do you get that on Absolute? Are there special bonuses? Link to post Share on other sites
kkot 0 Posted September 13, 2006 Share Posted September 13, 2006 How do you get that on Absolute? Are there special bonuses?If I remember correctly, it is a combination of bonuses, rakeback and player points.Abba wrote it in several other posts. I'll try to dig one up.edit: Found one! http://www.fullcontactpoker.com/poker-foru...73751&st=20post #36 Link to post Share on other sites
TheCorporation3 0 Posted September 14, 2006 Share Posted September 14, 2006 Have you ever used pokertracker before?It shouldnt be shocking.At low stakes hold em, it accounts for between 2 and 2.5BB/100.I'd say it is killing you. Or at least raping you.I maintain slightly better than 2BB/100 and get the equivalent of between 105-110% rakeback. Which means i effectively win about 4.5BB/100. The notion that party games are MUCH easier is a myth. My winrate dropped about .5BB/100 when making the transition to absolute. It's been well worth my while to switch.You are correct sir. Proud new player of WPEX. I saw you playing there a few days ago too. Thank you for all your info!!! Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now