Jump to content

This Iran Thing....


Recommended Posts

So, synopsis.Iran wants/is enriching uranium. They say for peaceful power, US and others say for weapons. Today was the deadline for Iran to stop before sanctions may be placed.OK.Iran is a sovereign country. Why, in all fairness, can't they make nukes, for energy or weaponry? We have them. Others have them. We didn't sanction India and Pakistan for having them (maybe pakistan for just a bit). They know that if we find out they sold one to a terrorist group, we'll turn their facilities into parking lots.They know if they fire one at us or an ally, we'll turn their whole country into a parking lot.So, at this point, do we need to place sanctions, piss them off worse and make gas go up to 4 bucks a gallon? Discuss.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, he.ll why not let everyone have a bunch of nukes? Especially the terrorists i'm sure they won't really use them. North Korea should have a bunch too.Are you serious?The world has been scaling back nuclear arms ever since the cold war and the majority of the world has agreed not to build more. Iran has a crazy zealot leader who threatens genocide on Jews on a daily basis and you could suggest it would be appropriate for them to have nukes?Anywho, with that said, if Nato, the major powers or both don't stop it, Isreal will. It will be difficult due to the fact that Iran has many underground facilities and moves them about to make airstrikes effective. Sanctions probably won't work well either since they can retaliate with vast amounts of oil and money.The best sitution is fuel the underground youth in Iran who oppose the dictatorship and want more freedoms.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Well, he.ll why not let everyone have a bunch of nukes? Especially the terrorists i'm sure they won't really use them. North Korea should have a bunch too.Are you serious?The world has been scaling back nuclear arms ever since the cold war and the majority of the world has agreed not to build more. Iran has a crazy zealot leader who threatens genocide on Jews on a daily basis and you could suggest it would be appropriate for them to have nukes?Anywho, with that said, if Nato, the major powers or both don't stop it, Isreal will. It will be difficult due to the fact that Iran has many underground facilities and moves them about to make airstrikes effective. Sanctions probably won't work well either since they can retaliate with vast amounts of oil and money.The best sitution is fuel the underground youth in Iran who oppose the dictatorship and want more freedoms.
We can do our best to convince countries otherwise. And, we're gonna know if "terrorists" get nukes. You can't just "move'em". The movies aren't reality. We would know where the nukes came from. We would solve the problem.I saw a news conference with Ahmenijahd last night. He's not a lunatic. He isn't a suicide-bomber turned president. Those Mullahs and him don't really care about worldwide islamic domination; they care about power. "Fueling the underground" isn't working...Iranians are more inspired in their country than they have been in a really long time.
Link to post
Share on other sites
George Bush likes high gas prices.
But he hates black people... and kids.... and 'working' Americans....
i heard he hates black people as well
DANG YOU!! We're not supposed to have the same sense of humor!
Link to post
Share on other sites
We can do our best to convince countries otherwise. And, we're gonna know if "terrorists" get nukes. You can't just "move'em". The movies aren't reality. We would know where the nukes came from. We would solve the problem.
we're gonna "know" they have them when they blow one up on Western soil -- I'd rather not wait for that
Link to post
Share on other sites
we're gonna "know" they have them when they blow one up on Western soil -- I'd rather not wait for that
LOL...you must not have very much faith in our intelligence services...Why blow up Tehran? Seriously? Just to do it?I would be much, much more worried that North Korea would do something like that before Iran. That guy is a total nutjob, has no friends, and no hope for power/influence outside of the DPRK.
Link to post
Share on other sites
LOL...you must not have very much faith in our intelligence services...Why blow up Tehran? Seriously? Just to do it?I would be much, much more worried that North Korea would do something like that before Iran. That guy is a total nutjob, has no friends, and no hope for power/influence outside of the DPRK.
I thought the thread was just about Iran.I'd be fine with leveling both.
Link to post
Share on other sites
LOL...you must not have very much faith in our intelligence services...Why blow up Tehran? Seriously? Just to do it?I would be much, much more worried that North Korea would do something like that before Iran. That guy is a total nutjob, has no friends, and no hope for power/influence outside of the DPRK.
Thats very BAD intelligence.
Link to post
Share on other sites

Donk, the president of Iran has openly stated his goal is to wipe Israel off the face of the earth, that means destroy it, and thats not cool -- why would you give him the oppurtunity to give it a shot? And no, I don't have a lot of faith in our intelligence, too many PC roadblocks in our own country

Link to post
Share on other sites
Donk, the president of Iran has openly stated his goal is to wipe Israel off the face of the earth, that means destroy it, and thats not cool -- why would you give him the oppurtunity to give it a shot? And no, I don't have a lot of faith in our intelligence, too many PC roadblocks in our own country
If you honestly believe there was worse than a 90% chance we would find out a nuke plot before it was carried out, AND you believe that Iran DOES NOT believe the USA would retaliate with nuclear attacks if Iran launched a nuclear weapon, then I understand your stance and would agree with it in your case.I don't believe any of the above.
Link to post
Share on other sites

The fundamentalist regime of Iran seeks not to procure nuclear weapons for self-defense. Rather, by becoming a nuclear power, accompanied by waning U.S. and European influence in the region, Iran sees the opportunity to become the hegemon of the Middle East. This is the necessary first step toward re-establishment of the Islamic caliphate, which is the ultimate goal. Furthermore, a disturbing lack of security protocol in India, Pakistan, and the former Soviet Republics lead to grave concern over the Iranian government's ability to secure a nuclear arsenal, especially when one considers how that government operates (i.e. the religious councils undue influence on potential political appointees and candidates).

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've just become disillusioned with some aspects of our foreign policy...i think we're just being hypocrites.What's wrong with "mutually assurred destruction"? Especially when I know it really isn't mutual b/c I'll win?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...