Nfc East
#1
Posted 26 August 2006 - 08:52 AM
Espn is so stupid rating the Eagles as low as they are. They have no wrs?
Who cares! They haven't for the past 4 years before last year when they went to NFC Championship Game every time.
Last year McNabb and the entire defense was hurt and they think its over?
Guaranteed NFC East Champs or I dont post for a year!!!!!
Anyone wanna wager?
E-A-G-L-E-S EAGLES!
#2
Posted 26 August 2006 - 09:49 AM
Without TO, McNabb was lost even when he was healthy last year. They don't have any receivers, the defense might be healthy but they have argueably the 3rd best defense in that division. Oh and your running back, has never carried for more than 1000 yards in a season.
#3
Posted 26 August 2006 - 10:24 AM
Without TO, McNabb went to 3 championship games without him. He was never healthy last year for he got hurt in the first game! I am a donk! They don't have any receivers, the defense might be healthy but they have argueably the best defense in that division. Oh and your running back, is the **** he just doesnt get many carries cuase of the offensive system hes under
FYP
#4
Posted 26 August 2006 - 10:29 AM
#5
Posted 26 August 2006 - 11:39 AM
Without TO, McNabb was lost even when he was healthy last year. They don't have any receivers, the defense might be healthy but they have argueably the 3rd best defense in that division. Oh and your running back, has never carried for more than 1000 yards in a season.
Wow...get off your knees about this T.O. guy...holy jesus. T.O. had ONE good year with Philly....the Eagles had success a lot other years than just that...yeah, McNabb had a bad year ONE year in which he was hurt. Now he sucks big time now, huh?? Come on....yeah, we get it, you like the Cowboys and he now plays for the Cowboys........that doesn't make him a football god now....get off it.
#6
Posted 26 August 2006 - 02:27 PM
Without TO, McNabb was lost even when he was healthy last year . They don't have any receivers, the defense might be healthy but they have argueably the 3rd best defense in that division. Oh and your running back, has never carried for more than 1000 yards in a season.
so he was lost for what??? 1 half????
he got hurt the very first game and never recovered. He was healthy for maybe...25 offensive plays
#7
Posted 26 August 2006 - 04:33 PM
I never said anything about the Cowboys did I, I already have money riding on how many games philly will win this year.
Sorry, that alter ego is taken, please reapply with a new one.
#8
Posted 26 August 2006 - 09:00 PM
Espn is so stupid rating the Eagles as low as they are. They have no wrs?
Who cares! They haven't for the past 4 years before last year when they went to NFC Championship Game every time.
Last year McNabb and the entire defense was hurt and they think its over?
Guaranteed NFC East Champs or I dont post for a year!!!!!
Anyone wanna wager?
E-A-G-L-E-S EAGLES!
The East will end like this
1. Dallas
2. Giants
3. Eagles
4. Redskins
This order was never edited. You're lying.
Oh and McNabb isn't very good, it's just that the media wants to uplift a black QB.
#9
Posted 26 August 2006 - 09:47 PM
go skins!
#10
Posted 27 August 2006 - 08:35 AM
1. Dallas
2. Redskins
3. Eagles
4. Giants
Oh and McNabb isn't very good, it's just that the media wants to uplift a black QB.
Thanks Rush Limbaugh
Not very good! Come on 4 NFC Championship games in a row under Reid. Come on!
hahah redskins over eagles. redskins! are u nuts? Have you seen their performance this preseason? Their starters continually get spanked.
You let me know how the Skins beat the Eagles when its 4th and 7 and Joe Gibbs decides to have a 3 yard route
#11
Posted 27 August 2006 - 08:47 AM
wait a sec there...
you mean its not good when your team gets outscored 87 - 17 in three straight games?
skins are soooo super bowl bound!
#12
Posted 27 August 2006 - 09:34 AM
2. Redskins
3. Cowboys
4. Eagles
All of them will have winning records except for Philly, which will be 8-8.
Zach6668: lol
Zubial: stop playing it
SuperUberBob: I like playing, just not the losing part
Zach6668: LOLZ
#13
Posted 27 August 2006 - 10:06 AM
You know what preseason means?
Not a damn thing.
The Redskins will have an excellent defense, and if they get any production from the WR position they could be a very scary team.
#14
Posted 28 August 2006 - 01:10 PM
2. Cowboys
3. Redskins
4. Eagles
THATS RIGHT, DEAD LAST EAGLES!!
#15
Posted 28 August 2006 - 08:36 PM
1. Giants (10-6)
2. Cowboys (10-6)
3. Eagles (8-8)
4. Redskins (7-9)
#16
Posted 29 August 2006 - 12:18 AM
I bet you $30 the Cowboys will finish with a better record than the Eagles.
#17
Posted 29 August 2006 - 10:26 AM
1. Giants (10-6)
2. Cowboys (10-6)
3. Eagles (8-8)
4. Redskins (7-9)
I think this will be almost exactly right.
#18
Posted 29 August 2006 - 05:25 PM
thanks. check out my AFC preview tell me what you think. it is in another thread entitled Afc predictions or something.
1. Dallas
2. Redskins
3. Eagles
4. Giants
Oh and McNabb isn't very good, it's just that the media wants to uplift a black QB.
I cant resist. The funniest thing about Rush's comments on Mcnabb were how spot on they were....if applied in the exact opposite manner he intended.
The fact of the matter is there is a great example of the media propping up a white athlete in the same division: Jason Sehorn.
No player ever got more endorsement deals and more name recognition for being a mediocre #2 corner. He was never a great CB at anytime and he was smoked left and right late in his career. Yet everyone knew his name and saw him doing Etrade and other ads. Because he was the only white CB in the league the media propped him up.
I think that is irony.
#19
Posted 29 August 2006 - 06:49 PM
1. Dallas
2. Giants
3. Eagles
4. Redskins
Oh and McNabb isn't very good, it's just that the media wants to uplift a black QB.
Did anyone see NFL Live tonight? This was the order they picked.
#20
Posted 30 August 2006 - 02:16 PM
well if NFL Live said so.....
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users
-
Google









