Jump to content


Afinogenov Re-signs


  • Please log in to reply
19 replies to this topic

#1 ajs510

ajs510

    Resident Evil

  • Members
  • 23,379 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Rochester, NY

Posted 02 August 2006 - 04:21 AM

Maxim Afinogenov re-signed with the Sabres for 3 more years, avoiding arbitration which could have potentially made it impossible for the team to retain him.

Things are looking up for the Sabres, pending the arbitrators ruling on JP Dumont. If he's awarded anything over $2.5 million, he'll be gone. Buffalo's payroll is sitting around $34 million with Miller, Briere, Kalinin, Dumont, and Mair still unsigned and replacements needed for Rory Fitzpatrick and Mike Grier. Mair won't be back if he's awarded over $1 million, which he probably won't be. He's really not good for much else than a checking center on the 4th line, and Buffalo rolls 4 lines that are expected to score.

I'm thinking Buffalo will probably fill those vacant spots with rookies from Rochester (Paetsch signed his qualifying offer and there are a lot of forwards who may be ready for the next step this year) and come in around $5-6 million under the cap. Hopefully they decide that Briere is a vital part of the teams success, regardless of whether he's worth $5 million per season or not, and bring him back.
QUOTE (DanielNegreanu @ Tuesday, August 25th, 2009, 3:41 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Also, who is Adam? Is he a poster on here?

#2 nell789

nell789

    2006 FCHL Regular Season Champion

  • Members
  • 3,112 posts

Posted 02 August 2006 - 08:20 AM

QUOTE (ajs510 @ Wednesday, August 2nd, 2006, 7:21 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Maxim Afinogenov re-signed with the Sabres for 3 more years, avoiding arbitration which could have potentially made it impossible for the team to retain him.

Things are looking up for the Sabres, pending the arbitrators ruling on JP Dumont. If he's awarded anything over $2.5 million, he'll be gone. Buffalo's payroll is sitting around $34 million with Miller, Briere, Kalinin, Dumont, and Mair still unsigned and replacements needed for Rory Fitzpatrick and Mike Grier. Mair won't be back if he's awarded over $1 million, which he probably won't be. He's really not good for much else than a checking center on the 4th line, and Buffalo rolls 4 lines that are expected to score.

I'm thinking Buffalo will probably fill those vacant spots with rookies from Rochester (Paetsch signed his qualifying offer and there are a lot of forwards who may be ready for the next step this year) and come in around $5-6 million under the cap. Hopefully they decide that Briere is a vital part of the teams success, regardless of whether he's worth $5 million per season or not, and bring him back.



They're at 34 mil without Briere? If that's the case, then they'll be a little closer to the cap than 5-6 million.

How much do you think Miller will get? Somewhere around 2.5-3 M?

#3 ajs510

ajs510

    Resident Evil

  • Members
  • 23,379 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Rochester, NY

Posted 02 August 2006 - 08:33 AM

QUOTE (nell789 @ Wednesday, August 2nd, 2006, 12:20 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
They're at 34 mil without Briere? If that's the case, then they'll be a little closer to the cap than 5-6 million.

How much do you think Miller will get? Somewhere around 2.5-3 M?


I would imagine it will take $3 million per to sign Miller long term, so you're right, if they want to keep Briere they'll probably have to spend all the way to the cap or trade someone.
QUOTE (DanielNegreanu @ Tuesday, August 25th, 2009, 3:41 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Also, who is Adam? Is he a poster on here?

#4 nell789

nell789

    2006 FCHL Regular Season Champion

  • Members
  • 3,112 posts

Posted 02 August 2006 - 10:37 AM

Dumont got 2.9 million.

That's ridiculous.

#5 ajs510

ajs510

    Resident Evil

  • Members
  • 23,379 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Rochester, NY

Posted 02 August 2006 - 11:36 AM

QUOTE (nell789 @ Wednesday, August 2nd, 2006, 2:37 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Dumont got 2.9 million.

That's ridiculous. He's gone.


FYP
QUOTE (DanielNegreanu @ Tuesday, August 25th, 2009, 3:41 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Also, who is Adam? Is he a poster on here?

#6 chester97

chester97

    i hate the oilers

  • Members
  • 1,526 posts
  • Location:Calgary Canada

Posted 03 August 2006 - 09:15 AM

the arbitrators for the sabres cases must be sens fans, cause there is no way any sensible person or people dish out the money given to the sabres players. no wonder darcy wants to sign people up before they get there.
that's the thing about bear attacks.........they come when you least expect it.

#7 ajs510

ajs510

    Resident Evil

  • Members
  • 23,379 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Rochester, NY

Posted 03 August 2006 - 09:37 AM

QUOTE (chester97 @ Thursday, August 3rd, 2006, 1:15 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
the arbitrators for the sabres cases must be sens fans, cause there is no way any sensible person or people dish out the money given to the sabres players. no wonder darcy wants to sign people up before they get there.


Leafs fans, the hearings are all held in Toronto.

Its seriously beyond retarded what these players are being awarded. I have no problem with a player getting a raise when it's deserved, but these arabitrators are basically cancelling out the salary rollback, which is both unfair and ridiculous.
QUOTE (DanielNegreanu @ Tuesday, August 25th, 2009, 3:41 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Also, who is Adam? Is he a poster on here?

#8 WestcoastCanuck

WestcoastCanuck

    Poker Forum Veteran

  • Members
  • 3,522 posts
  • Location:Victoria
  • Interests:Poker, Hockey, Soccer

Posted 03 August 2006 - 12:34 PM

QUOTE (ajs510 @ Thursday, August 3rd, 2006, 10:37 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Its seriously beyond retarded what these players are being awarded. I have no problem with a player getting a raise when it's deserved, but these arabitrators are basically cancelling out the salary rollback, which is both unfair and ridiculous.


There is no way the salary cap can sustain these kind of decisions. If 3-4 players per team, per year, get overpaid by almost a million dollars, everyone will be up against the cap.

#9 Jason12

Jason12

    Poker Forum Groupie

  • Members
  • 629 posts

Posted 03 August 2006 - 12:41 PM

Are the owners in Buffalo even commited to going over 40 million? They havent shown they want to spend money in the past.

#10 ajs510

ajs510

    Resident Evil

  • Members
  • 23,379 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Rochester, NY

Posted 03 August 2006 - 12:45 PM

QUOTE (Jason12 @ Thursday, August 3rd, 2006, 4:41 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Are the owners in Buffalo even commited to going over 40 million? They havent shown they want to spend money in the past.


All I ever hear about Buffalo is that they have their own salary cap, which doesn't approach the league's. Whether that's true or not, we're about to find out. They can certainly keep the team intact under the league rules, but there's no telling if Regier and Golisano will spend the money that will take. Small market hockey, it's the way it is.
QUOTE (DanielNegreanu @ Tuesday, August 25th, 2009, 3:41 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Also, who is Adam? Is he a poster on here?

#11 Jason12

Jason12

    Poker Forum Groupie

  • Members
  • 629 posts

Posted 03 August 2006 - 01:15 PM

QUOTE (ajs510 @ Thursday, August 3rd, 2006, 12:45 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
All I ever hear about Buffalo is that they have their own salary cap, which doesn't approach the league's. Whether that's true or not, we're about to find out. They can certainly keep the team intact under the league rules, but there's no telling if Regier and Golisano will spend the money that will take. Small market hockey, it's the way it is.


Well its not like New Jersey where the team is winning and people still arnt going. When Buffalo does good the fans show up. They also agreed on Briers arbitration so I guess they are willing to spend some money.

#12 Drac

Drac

    Poker Forum Newbie

  • Members
  • 85 posts

Posted 03 August 2006 - 06:41 PM

Looks like it's going to take a handfull of teams walking away from these stupid rulings followed by each player signing somewhere else for considerably less for the arbitors to realize how out of whack their rulings are. The Calder and Dumont rulings just don't make any sense at all. Briere's decision wasn't as bad but still fairly surprising.

Anybody know if the new CBA has the rule that if a team walks they can match any offer to that player that is below x% of the arbitration award? In the old CBA I think x = 60 but I have no idea if this is in the new deal.

#13 ajs510

ajs510

    Resident Evil

  • Members
  • 23,379 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Rochester, NY

Posted 04 August 2006 - 04:16 AM

QUOTE (Jason12 @ Thursday, August 3rd, 2006, 5:15 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Well its not like New Jersey where the team is winning and people still arnt going. When Buffalo does good the fans show up. They also agreed on Briers arbitration so I guess they are willing to spend some money.


I'm glad they accepted Briere's award, ridiculous or otherwise. He's a big key to their success, they need him in there. Dumont is as good as gone, there's no way he's worth the same money as Afinogenov or Drury. Shame that they won't get any value for him though, it would be nice if they could sign and trade him but no other team will think he's worth that much either.

Just gotta get Miller and Kalinin signed, then it's time for Training Camp so we can find out who's ready to move up from Rochester. I personally think you'll see Jiri Novotny and Clarke MacArthur moving into everyday roles with the Sabres, probably Nathan Paetsch as well.

They're in good shape, great job by Darcy Regier to get most of his arbitration players settled before their hearings. Without his efforts they'd be in a world of trouble.
QUOTE (DanielNegreanu @ Tuesday, August 25th, 2009, 3:41 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Also, who is Adam? Is he a poster on here?

#14 digitalmonkey

digitalmonkey

    Unenjoyable Annoying Retard

  • Members
  • 28,823 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Sudbury
  • Interests:sports, music, movies, photography
  • Favorite Poker Game:Hi/Lo Chicago

Posted 04 August 2006 - 05:50 AM

QUOTE (Drac @ Thursday, August 3rd, 2006, 10:41 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Looks like it's going to take a handfull of teams walking away from these stupid rulings followed by each player signing somewhere else for considerably less for the arbitors to realize how out of whack their rulings are. The Calder and Dumont rulings just don't make any sense at all. Briere's decision wasn't as bad but still fairly surprising.

Anybody know if the new CBA has the rule that if a team walks they can match any offer to that player that is below x% of the arbitration award? In the old CBA I think x = 60 but I have no idea if this is in the new deal.



I believe what you are talking about is still in the CBA, but I'm not sure about the number.

#15 Ice_W0lf

Ice_W0lf

    Poker Forum Nut

  • Members
  • 390 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:SC

Posted 06 August 2006 - 07:08 PM

Now Adam Mair was just awarded 1 year $675k. I know that's not a ton, but he missed half the season due to injury, and when he did play he only had like 7 or 8 points. I realize he's being paid to be nothing more than a fourth line checking center, but still I see no justifiable reason to increase his pay just over $200k. Since the ruling is less than $1.4 million, Buffalo is forced to accept the offer. I believe they should have just let him go and signed someone cheaper to do the same job, or brought someone up from Rochester. As for Dumont, I don't see how Buffalo can keep him now after being practically raped by the arbitrator. With Kalinin and Miller left to be signed, I see no way Dumont is in a Slug.. I mean Sabre.. uniform next season.

#16 ajs510

ajs510

    Resident Evil

  • Members
  • 23,379 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Rochester, NY

Posted 07 August 2006 - 05:59 AM

Why is it that the Sabres are forced to accept Mair's arbitration ruling due to the fact that his salary will be less than $1.4 million, but the Bruins were able to walk away from David Tanabe after he was awarded $1.275 million?

Doesn't make sense to me, unless the numbers are being reported wrong...

I don't really think Mair is worth having on the team in the first place, but $675,000 for a 4th liner who can hit isn't that bad.
QUOTE (DanielNegreanu @ Tuesday, August 25th, 2009, 3:41 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Also, who is Adam? Is he a poster on here?

#17 digitalmonkey

digitalmonkey

    Unenjoyable Annoying Retard

  • Members
  • 28,823 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Sudbury
  • Interests:sports, music, movies, photography
  • Favorite Poker Game:Hi/Lo Chicago

Posted 07 August 2006 - 07:22 AM

QUOTE (Ice_W0lf @ Sunday, August 6th, 2006, 11:08 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Since the ruling is less than $1.4 million, Buffalo is forced to accept the offer.


I don't think this is true.

http://www.nhl.com/nhlhq/cba/archive/cba/article12.html

And I found the number mentioned earlier.

If a team lets a player walk, they still have the right to match any contract amount under 80% of the arbitrator's awarded figure.

#18 Jason12

Jason12

    Poker Forum Groupie

  • Members
  • 629 posts

Posted 07 August 2006 - 05:27 PM

Ladislav Nagy just got 3 million in arbitration and he almost put up identical numbers to Brier how come he gets 3 and Brier gets 5?

#19 digitalmonkey

digitalmonkey

    Unenjoyable Annoying Retard

  • Members
  • 28,823 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Sudbury
  • Interests:sports, music, movies, photography
  • Favorite Poker Game:Hi/Lo Chicago

Posted 07 August 2006 - 07:08 PM

QUOTE (Jason12 @ Monday, August 7th, 2006, 9:27 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Ladislav Nagy just got 3 million in arbitration and he almost put up identical numbers to Brier how come he gets 3 and Brier gets 5?



Maybe because Nagy gets injured every year.

Maybe because Janet Gretzky made a call.

Maybe because Nagy is European and Briere is not.

#20 Drac

Drac

    Poker Forum Newbie

  • Members
  • 85 posts

Posted 08 August 2006 - 09:26 AM

QUOTE
And I found the number mentioned earlier.

If a team lets a player walk, they still have the right to match any contract amount under 80% of the arbitrator's awarded figure.

Where did you find it? I looked on the NHLPA web site and couldn't find it in the CBA. Boy does that thing take a while to load!




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users