Jump to content


Should You Ever Just Limp In?


  • Please log in to reply
7 replies to this topic

#1 AcesOnFire

AcesOnFire

    Poker Forum Veteran

  • Members
  • 1,039 posts

Posted 07 July 2006 - 04:07 PM

So is it a good idea ever? Acceptable even? Talking NL hold 'em here but it doesn't hurt to mention other games.
I've known hexidecimal since before I was A.

#2 mrdannyg

mrdannyg

    Shufflin'

  • Members
  • 16,833 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 07 July 2006 - 04:13 PM

I assume you mean open-limp.In NL the answer is yes. Implied odds are your friend.In limit the answer is extremely rare. If you never do it, you probably aren't making any big mistakes (except at micro-limits). If you are playing at a very passive table, many hands that you would limp behind can be open-limped, but keep in mind how much being out of position with a drawing hand hurts your implied odds and EV.Normally I would say "probably not" for limit, but I did it today (for the first time in 20K hands). Table was very very passive, I had a low pocket pair. That's about it, though good suited connectors may be open-limped under optimal conditions.Most people do it too much though. Unless you have a good understanding of why this particular situation is good for it, just never do it.
Long signatures are really annoying.

#3 Actuary

Actuary

    .

  • Members
  • 19,026 posts

Posted 08 July 2006 - 11:22 AM

Danny,that's ridiculous to say open limping is rarely the correct play in Limit.maybe at higher stakes or SH, but not full table lower limits. - unless very tight

#4 Zach6668

Zach6668

    2009 Stanley Cup Champions

  • Moderators
  • 38,075 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Ottawa, ON

Posted 08 July 2006 - 09:27 PM

View PostActuary, on Saturday, July 8th, 2006, 3:22 PM, said:

Danny,that's ridiculous to say open limping is rarely the correct play in Limit.maybe at higher stakes or SH, but not full table lower limits. - unless very tight
Danny, stop playing at Absolute...
QUOTE (serge @ Tuesday, May 12th, 2009, 7:20 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
LETS GO PITTSBURGH
QUOTE (Acid_Knight @ Monday, March 10th, 2008, 4:15 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Zach is right about pretty much everything.

#5 dimseven

dimseven

    Poker Forum Veteran

  • Members
  • 1,594 posts

Posted 09 July 2006 - 05:15 PM

Open limping is a fairweather friend.

#6 mrdannyg

mrdannyg

    Shufflin'

  • Members
  • 16,833 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 09 July 2006 - 08:35 PM

View PostActuary, on Saturday, July 8th, 2006, 2:22 PM, said:

Danny,that's ridiculous to say open limping is rarely the correct play in Limit.maybe at higher stakes or SH, but not full table lower limits. - unless very tight

View PostZach6668, on Sunday, July 9th, 2006, 12:27 AM, said:

Danny, stop playing at Absolute...
you are both correct.i have played some LHE recently on some other sites, including Stars, Party, etc and I'll refine my statements to say that you should very carefully consider open-limping because most people do it too much.if the table is passive though for instance, it is often a mistake not to open-limp small pairs. but i do think non-paired hands ar eoften mistakes to open-limp. too many people open-limp with a hand like TJs when they could either fold from early position or raise from mid to late.i'll summarize:unless your table is very passive, carefully consider whether open-limping is the best of the three available options.
Long signatures are really annoying.

#7 checkymcfold

checkymcfold

    almost back to real stakes.

  • Members
  • 9,114 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:stanley mission, sk
  • Favorite Poker Game:night baseball

Posted 09 July 2006 - 09:25 PM

View Postmrdannyg, on Monday, July 10th, 2006, 12:35 AM, said:

you are both correct.i have played some LHE recently on some other sites, including Stars, Party, etc and I'll refine my statements to say that you should very carefully consider open-limping because most people do it too much.if the table is passive though for instance, it is often a mistake not to open-limp small pairs. but i do think non-paired hands ar eoften mistakes to open-limp. too many people open-limp with a hand like TJs when they could either fold from early position or raise from mid to late.i'll summarize:unless your table is very passive, carefully consider whether open-limping is the best of the three available options.
generally speaking, if you're not at a table where open limping can be correct, you should probably switch tables.i was playing some 5/10 live last night, and limped 56s utg a couple times with complete confidence. if i hadn't switched tables earlier, i couldn't have done that.but yeah, your situations for when it's ok are good, but they're not very rare at most sites.
QUOTE (Dirtydutch @ Tuesday, December 2nd, 2008, 12:21 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
If there are two things LHE players like, they are weed and pornography. The third would be kittens. LHE does not appear on the list.





#8 mrdannyg

mrdannyg

    Shufflin'

  • Members
  • 16,833 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 09 July 2006 - 09:38 PM

View Postcheckymcfold, on Monday, July 10th, 2006, 12:25 AM, said:

generally speaking, if you're not at a table where open limping can be correct, you should probably switch tables.i was playing some 5/10 live last night, and limped 56s utg a couple times with complete confidence. if i hadn't switched tables earlier, i couldn't have done that.but yeah, your situations for when it's ok are good, but they're not very rare at most sites.
well as far as table selection is extremely important, you're obviously right.however in terms of open-limping with medium suited connectors for instance, i think to do that profitably requires the postflop skill of someone who probably doesn't have to ask this type of question.as i think i said earlier though, if you're table is very passive (and you should be looking for these tables) then you can open-limp pretty much any hand you would otherwise limp, adjusting slightly for position.note to self: stop playing at Absolute.
Long signatures are really annoying.




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users