Too Early, Too Little?
#1
Posted 15 June 2006 - 04:56 AM
I get 55 UTG. BB is table chip leader, with 1.2mil.
I raise to 90K, which has been the standard steal/raise and 90% of these moves are working for the person making the move.
All fold around to BB. BB raises all in. As BB had thought a while before re-raising, I figured him for high cards and was on a semi-resteal.
I decide to call, as I would have been left with 210K and the blinds are about to be rammed down my throat.
Sure enough, he has AQs (spades). Flop is 4-Q-4, no help on the turn or river and I'm done.
My question: Could I have afforded to wait? If not, should I have raised all in, instead of just the standard raise? Also, whatever play I made, do you think the BB would have called anyway?
Thanks!
Edit: Here's some of the requested missing info>>> Average stack was probably around 500K+. I was SS at this table (most had 500-700K). At the time of the push, there were 7 players at the table, not full but not really short-handed either.
#2
Posted 15 June 2006 - 05:06 AM
Once you encountered resistance from a large stack, you needed to shut down. At BEST you were in a race situation, if not dominated. You really think your opponent would push you all-in with a pocket pair less than 5's? If it was a short stack, maybe, just maybe, you could call there, but definately not against a stack that can bust you.
This should have been an easy laydown IMO (but I wouldn't have raised in in the first place), waiting for a much better spot to put your tournament at risk.
#3
Posted 15 June 2006 - 05:27 AM
If the table is 6-7 handed I probably push, but if its full or close to full I'm folding and waiting for a better spot. As it was he probably would have called your push, but maybe not. You'll never know and because he got to dictate play I think his play is fine, calling off 25% of his stack with AQ would be a little tougher, but probably correct as well.
#4
Posted 15 June 2006 - 05:43 AM
If the table is especially passive I might limp (or if I'm at a table where utg limps are seen to be suspicious), where I might see a flop for cheap...but even then you have to hit your set and there's nothing to indicate you'll double up if you hit it, which is the only way that pays for itself.
In your situation I likely fold, unless I'm tired or my wife's naked and telling me to get my *** in bed.
#5
Posted 15 June 2006 - 06:11 AM
#6
Posted 15 June 2006 - 06:31 AM
First blog. I don't really know why you would want to read it but if you do, go ahead..New update! Will update in Feb in light of 4.40 challenge!
http://blogs.texasholdem.com/Throwemaway/index.php
#7
Posted 15 June 2006 - 07:35 AM
QFT <sigh>
#8
Posted 15 June 2006 - 09:25 AM
which one depends on the propensity of BB and others to make loose calls (sounds like they dont) and the other stack sizes, payouts...
#9
Posted 15 June 2006 - 11:37 AM
Go all-in preflop!
#10
Posted 15 June 2006 - 11:38 AM
Go all-in preflop!
I doubt that!
#11
Posted 15 June 2006 - 11:43 AM
#12
Posted 15 June 2006 - 11:48 AM
Yes, I have, and I'm about 1/3 of the way through Volume III.
Not here he wouldn't. Yes, we may be in the red zone, but clearly so are a bunch of our opponents. We are in early position. We have a low pocket pair. Way too many players yet to act, some of which will certainly be almost as deperate if not more so than us here (we don't know the chip stacks...tsk tsk tsk).
I'd be willing to wager a little something-something that Harrington would NOT push pre-flop here, IF I knew the chip stacks.
#13
Posted 15 June 2006 - 11:51 AM
Blinds total 57K at this point (or thereabouts). 15K/30K, Antes 1500
#14
Posted 15 June 2006 - 11:54 AM
"Notice the question I haven't asked: What is my position. With a low M, you're position doesn't matter much any more. The reason is that the worse your position (i.e. you're first or second to act), the closer you are to the blinds, which will chop away a huge percentage of your stack. Paradoxically, when your position is bad, you're under even more pressure to be the first player in the pot and grab your first-player vigorish."
Also, if you're looking for an exact hand in that chapter, he advocates pushing 87o from second position with an M of 3 and with only 2 of the 8 players at the table having Ms over 5.
#15
Posted 15 June 2006 - 11:54 AM
Blinds total 57K at this point (or thereabouts). 15K/30K, Antes 1500
Wow, what a totally different picture this is from what I was thinking earlier. See how important this info is to the answers???
#16
Posted 15 June 2006 - 11:57 AM
#17
Posted 15 June 2006 - 12:01 PM
"Notice the question I haven't asked: What is my position. With a low M, you're position doesn't matter much any more. The reason is that the worse your position (i.e. you're first or second to act), the closer you are to the blinds, which will chop away a huge percentage of your stack. Paradoxically, when your position is bad, you're under even more pressure to be the first player in the pot and grab your first-player vigorish."
Also, if you're looking for an exact hand in that chapter, he advocates pushing 87o from second position with an M of 3 and with only 2 of the 8 players at the table having Ms over 5.
Our M is 5 according to the original post. I didnt check the math to verify. Huge difference between 5 and 3 here.
However, now that we have been provided the information that I indicated was essential from the git-go, I like a push much more than I did previously...
#18
Posted 15 June 2006 - 12:05 PM
#19
Posted 16 June 2006 - 05:51 AM
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users









