Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Omaha Hi $0.50-$0.50 PL (Real Money), #498,287,620Table Cork, 18 May 2006 6:31 PM ETSeat 1: scott3705 ($98 in chips)Seat 2: ALL_IN_BEALE ($25.95 in chips)Seat 3: weistronaut ($95.95 in chips)Seat 4: sirflatland ($57.65 in chips)Seat 5: JUSTTHECHIPS ($52.80 in chips)Seat 6: spruced ($23.25 in chips)Seat 7: wurkbytes ($89.95 in chips)Seat 9: Tuuriperse ($103.50 in chips)Seat 10: SlTTING OUT ($84.10 in chips)ANTES/BLINDSweistronaut posts blind ($0.50), sirflatland posts blind ($0.50).PRE-FLOPJUSTTHECHIPS calls $0.50, spruced folds, wurkbytes folds, Tuuriperse folds, SlTTING OUT bets $2.50, scott3705 calls $2.50, ALL_IN_BEALE folds, weistronaut folds, sirflatland folds, JUSTTHECHIPS calls $2.FLOP [board cards 4S,JS,KC ]JUSTTHECHIPS checks, SlTTING OUT bets $8.50, scott3705 bets $25, JUSTTHECHIPS folds, SlTTING OUT calls $16.50.TURN [board cards 4S,JS,KC,9D ]SlTTING OUT bets $56.60 and is all-in, scott3705 calls $56.60.RIVER [board cards 4S,JS,KC,9D,6D ]SHOWDOWNscott3705 shows [ KH,AC,2H,KS ]Villian was very LAG. Raised a lot of flop and seemed fairly stubborn.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Omaha Hi $0.50-$0.50 PL (Real Money), #498,287,620Table Cork, 18 May 2006 6:31 PM ETSeat 1: scott3705 ($98 in chips)Seat 2: ALL_IN_BEALE ($25.95 in chips)Seat 3: weistronaut ($95.95 in chips)Seat 4: sirflatland ($57.65 in chips)Seat 5: JUSTTHECHIPS ($52.80 in chips)Seat 6: spruced ($23.25 in chips)Seat 7: wurkbytes ($89.95 in chips)Seat 9: Tuuriperse ($103.50 in chips)Seat 10: SlTTING OUT ($84.10 in chips)ANTES/BLINDSweistronaut posts blind ($0.50), sirflatland posts blind ($0.50).PRE-FLOPJUSTTHECHIPS calls $0.50, spruced folds, wurkbytes folds, Tuuriperse folds, SlTTING OUT bets $2.50, scott3705 calls $2.50, ALL_IN_BEALE folds, weistronaut folds, sirflatland folds, JUSTTHECHIPS calls $2.FLOP [board cards 4S,JS,KC ]JUSTTHECHIPS checks, SlTTING OUT bets $8.50, scott3705 bets $25, JUSTTHECHIPS folds, SlTTING OUT calls $16.50.TURN [board cards 4S,JS,KC,9D ]SlTTING OUT bets $56.60 and is all-in, scott3705 calls $56.60.RIVER [board cards 4S,JS,KC,9D,6D ]SHOWDOWNscott3705 shows [ KH,AC,2H,KS ]Villian was very LAG. Raised a lot of flop and seemed fairly stubborn.
I might have reraised preflop to isolate against said Villain. Turn is tough, but I guess you've got to call assuming that you're good at least 20% of the time and still have 10 outs to bail you out if villain does have QT.
Link to post
Share on other sites
I might have reraised preflop to isolate against said Villain. Turn is tough, but I guess you've got to call assuming that you're good at least 20% of the time and still have 10 outs to bail you out if villain does have QT.
I'm really not comfortable enough post flop to play this hand in a bloated flop pot. As I get more comfortable, I may consider it.
Link to post
Share on other sites

I would be folding the turn, unless you had a very strong read on your opponent. Even with a good read on him, you want to be battling him with a made hand or a monster draw.Just my opinion, and I may be too tight in PLO ring games.

Link to post
Share on other sites
I would be folding the turn, unless you had a very strong read on your opponent. Even with a good read on him, you want to be battling him with a made hand or a monster draw.Just my opinion, and I may be too tight in PLO ring games.
I would normally strongly consider folding here and come to the conclusion. I realize now, that what made me base my call on, i wrote like dyslexic 3rd grader.the villian raised a lot preflop and generally tried to steamroll the table. He was also stubborn post flop if he got played back at and had shown 2 stone cold bluffs in the last 3 orbits.
Link to post
Share on other sites
I would be folding the turn, unless you had a very strong read on your opponent. Even with a good read on him, you want to be battling him with a made hand or a monster draw.Just my opinion, and I may be too tight in PLO ring games.
are you high? you realize you're behind exactly one hand, right? against something like AAQx with spades, you're about a 3:1 favorite. against something like AAT8 with spades, you're about a 2:1 favorite. even against AAQT with spades, you're about 25% to fill up. folding this turn would be absolutely ludicrous.
Link to post
Share on other sites
are you high? you realize you're behind exactly one hand, right?
Um, I guess you could put it that way....but for some reason you seem to assume that villain's first 2 cards are aces. Yes, in that case you are only behind AAQT. But in reality you are behind any QT, which is A LOT of hands.
against something like AAQx with spades, you're about a 3:1 favorite. against something like AAT8 with spades, you're about a 2:1 favorite. even against AAQT with spades, you're about 25% to fill up. folding this turn would be absolutely ludicrous.
Like I said, I may be too tight for PLO ring games....but where did you come up with those hand possibilities??Why does his opponent have AA????? I think it looks very much like he has QTxx (perhaps TJQK)
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...