pokerplayer24 0 Posted May 17, 2006 Share Posted May 17, 2006 Villain is a 50/22/1.5I just dont see a reason to play these spots aggressively anymore. Am I missing out on value.PokerStars 10/20 Hold'em (5 handed) Hand History Converter Tool from FlopTurnRiver.com (Format: FlopTurnRiver)Preflop: Hero is BB with 5, A. 1 fold, MP calls, 2 folds, Hero checks.Flop: (2.50 SB) 9, 6, A(2 players)Hero checks, MP bets, Hero calls.Turn: (2.25 BB) 3(2 players)Hero checks, MP bets, Hero calls.River: (4.25 BB) T(2 players)Hero checks, MP bets, Hero calls.Final Pot: 6.25 BB Link to post Share on other sites
checkymcfold 0 Posted May 17, 2006 Share Posted May 17, 2006 this is precisely the kind of situation where calling down is ok, unless you're planning on raising the flop and folding later on, which you shouldn't be against a LAG. i might raise and call down, but just calling down seems ok too. i don't know if we're good often enough to raise and call down. Link to post Share on other sites
aim786 0 Posted May 17, 2006 Share Posted May 17, 2006 I think this is a really good line to use against people that just bet, bet, bet. C/r flop is ok too. Link to post Share on other sites
AlphaOmega 0 Posted May 17, 2006 Share Posted May 17, 2006 I have about 3-4 hands like these per day, and I think a passive line really maximizes value versus very aggressive players. I disagree with check/raising the flop. A lot of the villain's range is complete air, so it's best to just let him hang himself, rather than allow him to fold cheaply.Edit: Just noticed this was an MP limper, so his range isn't exactly air. It still consists largely of worse hands that are drawing somethat thin, so your line is still optimal IMO. Link to post Share on other sites
jayboogie 0 Posted May 17, 2006 Share Posted May 17, 2006 I don't see how villain is neccessarily aggressive if he's limping in the first place. Your line is ok though if he's shown that he bets when checked to. I wouldn't mind a more aggressive line either, both are fine depending on your opponent's tendencies. Link to post Share on other sites
wrto4556 0 Posted May 19, 2006 Share Posted May 19, 2006 i like to get more aggressive shorthanded. He's likely to pay off and theres no real reason for us to think villian is way behind.check/call-donk. check/call-check/raise. Something a little more than check/calling the whole way. Link to post Share on other sites
pokerplayer24 0 Posted May 19, 2006 Author Share Posted May 19, 2006 I don't see how villain is neccessarily aggressive if he's limping in the first place. Your line is ok though if he's shown that he bets when checked to. I wouldn't mind a more aggressive line either, both are fine depending on your opponent's tendencies.Aggressive postflop and preflop are 2 different things Link to post Share on other sites
greatwhite 0 Posted May 20, 2006 Share Posted May 20, 2006 I think that I would donk this turn. I think that this might confuse and an agressive opponent and have him reraise with a lot weaker hands. Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now