The Da Vinci Code
#1
Posted 14 May 2006 - 01:15 AM
#2
Posted 14 May 2006 - 01:23 AM
#3
Posted 14 May 2006 - 01:23 AM
#4
Posted 14 May 2006 - 01:28 AM
i figured it was the wrong forum but i couldnt find any movie forum. maybe tv wouldve been better.
and youre right it does come out next week. looks like i shi-t the bed on this one.
#5
Posted 14 May 2006 - 05:34 AM
I have never been a big reader, I hate reading, but the chapters are like 2-3 pages, so its a lot of fun and you feel accomplished after finish a chapter.
I just kept it near the john and read it when I was taking care of business.
Just when you think the book cant get any better....it does.
I love movies but I would rate this book higher than 99% of the movies out there
http://blog.myspace.com/41122460
#6
Posted 14 May 2006 - 05:58 AM
#7
Posted 14 May 2006 - 07:00 AM
#8
Posted 14 May 2006 - 07:27 AM
#9
Posted 14 May 2006 - 08:02 AM
I've heard Angels and Demons is better than The DaVinci Code. Do you agree?
#10
Posted 14 May 2006 - 08:07 AM
ive only read angels and deamons and it was awesome! best book ive ever read....not that ive read many. Im gonna start the da vinci code one of these days. But i have heard that angels and deamons is better aswell. I think the da vinci code is more appealing on a commercial level.
stars nameMrPristine
full tilt - profxavier9
#11
Posted 14 May 2006 - 08:11 AM
I'm assuming by your handle your a fan of X-men. What did you think of the movies? Compared to the other comic book made movies out there I thought the X-men were pretty solid. Third one looks good too.
#12
Posted 14 May 2006 - 08:27 AM
And I'm not even religious; I just hate Dan Brown's writing style. I guess I can see why it's so popular, but I couldn't stand it.
#13
Posted 14 May 2006 - 08:31 AM
no one else caught this? hahah
"If you ain't first, you're last."
Ricky Bobby
#14
Posted 14 May 2006 - 08:40 AM
Yes, but they're both good.
#15
Posted 14 May 2006 - 08:50 AM
#16
Posted 14 May 2006 - 09:09 AM
I figured it was a joke....
#17
Posted 14 May 2006 - 09:57 AM
Hard to find a good mechanic for Deloreans

for great rakeback paid daily at RakeUpdate, click here !
for great rakeback paid monthly at RaketheRake, please refer to member RTR20401
#18
Posted 14 May 2006 - 11:46 AM
#19
Posted 14 May 2006 - 12:38 PM
yeah, this is just the type of guy that Code the book appeals to. The never reader. Anyone who actually enjoys reading, has an attention span longer than 2-3 pages, and doesn't enjoy inintentional comedy. This book is the worst book I've read in about 5 years, since I read "left behind" the book. If you like Grisham, by this book. Otherwise, run screaming from any Code displays at your bookstore.
*** Edit***
You Divinci code book fans need to take a cruise with all the Home
Improvement TV show fans ( assuming these two fan bases don't enteirely overlap) In the Far north atlantic with a drunken captian.

"We are only wise in knowing that we know nothing"
-Socrates
"Dust. Wind. Dude."
-Ted Theodore Logan
SN: BigDMcGee on Stars and UB. I do NOT have a full tilt account because those Richers won't give me rakeback.
#20
Posted 14 May 2006 - 01:02 PM
I actually thought that they were very similar. One thing that I disliked about both books is that they lead up to one conclusion for the entire book, then in the last 10 or so chapters, there are about 10 plot twists crammed in right at the end. Don't get me wrong, I like plot twists, but it just seems that Dan Brown tries to cram too many of them right before the book ends.
To all the high-and-mighty-readers that think that Dan Brown caters to the non-reader, what is so wrong with his writing style? He spends the first few chapters on character development, then sets up several plot lines. The reasons the chapters are so short is that he tries to juggle all of the plot lines so that the reader doesn't lose interest in any of them. If you read ever 3rd or 4th chapter, you could follow one plot line from beginning to end, but I like the plot switching. Like I said before, his books read like you are watching a movie.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users










