Rational Emotions
#1
Posted 27 April 2006 - 01:47 PM
is it rational to bare emotions for fictional characters?
this is my dissertation/major paper title which is in for tommorow.
as i waste so much time shooting the breeze on here, i figure its my right to ask if anyone has any info or by some small miracle did a similar paper.
please help or im screwed.
i do philosophy, but its an english based title.
a flamee in need is a flamee indeed.
#2
Posted 27 April 2006 - 02:00 PM
#3
Posted 27 April 2006 - 02:00 PM
Cry when old yeller gets it?
Get choked up in field of dreams?
Lots of people cried when Jack dies in Titanic. Jack....come back jack.....
You are really asking the question, is it rational to have feelings?
Characters being real or not doesn't diminish the events they are placed in and how it is perceived by the audience. If that were the case... and this may be an extreme example but you get my point, we all could watch a movie portrayal of a clearly non-existent super hero raping a small child on the planet marklar... and not care one way or the other because it is pure fiction. The child is just an actor and the act never really happened. So no bother to waste an emotional thought.
I would say the act of no emotion is the only thing not rational.
Come on... Samwise picks up FRODO on his BACK!! A hobbit.... and I felt some emotion.
#4
Posted 27 April 2006 - 02:00 PM
is it rational to bare emotions for fictional characters?
this is my dissertation/major paper title which is in for tommorow.
as i waste so much time shooting the breeze on here, i figure its my right to ask if anyone has any info or by some small miracle did a similar paper.
please help or im screwed.
i do philosophy, but its an english based title.
a flamee in need is a flamee indeed.
If I could find a way to transform myself into a video game, I would be humping Lara Croft until the cows come home.
I hope that helps you, if not I have just opened the door to myself being flamed.
Oh well, cest la vie
ANCORA IMPARO
#5
Posted 27 April 2006 - 02:09 PM
frankybones, youre a clever man.
ill give someone 250 stars dollars if they can send me 8000 good words on it, with quotes by 4pm (british time)... tomorrow.
#6
Posted 27 April 2006 - 02:20 PM
Crap, my British watch is broken. I think the teeth on the gears are all crooked.
Ba dum bump!
#7
Posted 27 April 2006 - 02:22 PM
Ba dum bump!
WHAT A FANTASTIC TIME TO MAKE A **** JOKE
THE BA DUM BUMP, IN MY MIND, WAS ME HITTING YOU AND YOU FALLING DOWN THE STAIRS.
#8
Posted 27 April 2006 - 02:23 PM
THE BA DUM BUMP, IN MY MIND, WAS ME HITTING YOU AND YOU FALLING DOWN THE STAIRS.
TILT! TILT! TILT! TILT! TILT! TILT!
#9
Posted 27 April 2006 - 02:26 PM
frankybones, youre a clever man.
ill give someone 250 stars dollars if they can send me 8000 good words on it, with quotes by 4pm (british time)... tomorrow.
I am a freelance writer and consider myself a good one. (when an editor has checked my work) There really is no time to do this. However even at the retarded price of 5 cents a word. You are looking at $400.
I wrote 12,000 words yesterday for a project I am doing and it took almost all day. And this all done before any spelling or grammer checks.
Kids.. pay attention. School FIRST... everything else.. second.
#10
Posted 27 April 2006 - 02:27 PM
badumbump badumbump badumbump
#11
Posted 27 April 2006 - 02:27 PM
#12
Posted 27 April 2006 - 02:29 PM
badumbump badumbump badumbump
You can't upset me. You're just a fictional character in my mind, and deriving any emotion from you would be irrational. Or would it?
#13
Posted 27 April 2006 - 02:29 PM
#14
Posted 27 April 2006 - 02:34 PM
I say that it is rational. Fictional characters remind you of the real world, and cause genuine emotional responses.
Hitler was not motivated by hate.
Gervais: What do you worry about, that you've heard on the news?
Pilkington: I heard something about worms getting teeth.
#15
Posted 27 April 2006 - 02:34 PM
however im not rich and some people might not have been in a position where they had a choice. $250 is still $250 to some broke clever philosopher out there.
ive actually got about 4000 done. just got to stay up all night and do 4000 more. and its not going to be great which is the main issue.
thanks for your thoughts and help though.
#16
Posted 27 April 2006 - 02:44 PM
however im not rich and some people might not have been in a position where they had a choice. $250 is still $250 to some broke clever philosopher out there.
ive actually got about 4000 done. just got to stay up all night and do 4000 more. and its not going to be great which is the main issue.
thanks for your thoughts and help though.
Stop posting! and get to it... If you post one more time before it is done, you are a complete moron and a safe will fall out of the sky and land on your head.
By responding means you acknowledge you are a moron and risk death.
A for Effort.. remember that. heh Again.. let us know how it goes. I am curious to know.
#17
Posted 27 April 2006 - 02:46 PM
Cry when old yeller gets it?
Get choked up in field of dreams?
Lots of people cried when Jack dies in Titanic. Jack....come back jack.....
You are really asking the question, is it rational to have feelings?
Characters being real or not doesn't diminish the events they are placed in and how it is perceived by the audience. If that were the case... and this may be an extreme example but you get my point, we all could watch a movie portrayal of a clearly non-existent super hero raping a small child on the planet marklar... and not care one way or the other because it is pure fiction. The child is just an actor and the act never really happened. So no bother to waste an emotional thought.
I would say the act of no emotion is the only thing not rational.
Come on... Samwise picks up FRODO on his BACK!! A hobbit.... and I felt some emotion.
crack, lets run away together
Hey Crack, how did you get that avatar?
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users










