When To Laydown Aa

[jcdoerre 0]

UTG calls, EP calls, Hero raises with AA, SB calls, BB folds, UTG calls, EP calls.Flop :card_clubs_7:SB checks, UTG checks, EP checks, Hero bets, SB folds, UTG calls, EP calls.Turn: :card_diamonds_4:UTG checks, EP checks, Hero bets, UTG calls, EP folds.River: :card_hearts_k:UTG checks, Hero bets, UTG raises, Hero re-raises, UTG calls.

[Wingmaster05 0]

I dont know what you mean "lay down", as you 3 bet the rvier and he just called, but everything is standard except I would just call the river.If he hit his king, most of the time he will bet out. If he has a stronger hand, he will typically check raise.You clearly cant fold anywhere during this hand; the river is the only place were someone else bets, and its very possible he has just kings. No fold, ever, here.

[aim786 0]

I dont know what you mean "lay down", as you 3 bet the rvier and he just called, but everything is standard except I would just call the river.If he hit his king, most of the time he will bet out. If he has a stronger hand, he will typically check raise.You clearly cant fold anywhere during this hand; the river is the only place were someone else bets, and its very possible he has just kings. No fold, ever, here.

I agree.

[The Nuts 0]

No player is bad enough to lay down AA in that situation.

[Garn 0]

i think that you played the hand fine

[Swift_Psycho 1]

I dont know what you mean "lay down", as you 3 bet the rvier and he just called, but everything is standard except I would just call the river.No fold, ever, here.

[Zach6668 513]

I'm absolutely not 3-betting this river.

[doubleatrain 0]

You can't fold this hand anywhere the way it played out. I'd just call the river raise, but there is no spot that suggests a fold.(Edited to make sense)

[Actuary 3]

huh?

[pokerplayer24 0]

I'm absolutely not 3-betting this river.

Reasoning?Its a KQ / KJ type hand way more often then its a set.Only thing that might make me think twice is his relative position. He could have just called the turn with a set to try and get the overcall from EP.

[Zach6668 513]

Reasoning?Its a KQ / KJ type hand way more often then its a set.Only thing that might make me think twice is his relative position. He could have just called the turn with a set to try and get the overcall from EP.

Umm... good point. I dunno... maybe I've just become a wuss...

[amarillotg 0]

Reasoning?Its a KQ / KJ type hand way more often then its a set.Only thing that might make me think twice is his relative position. He could have just called the turn with a set to try and get the overcall from EP.

im not 3-betting the river. i doubt he has a set but i think often enough he's going to flip over raggedy 2 pair with a K. (K9, K7)obviously a read would help but i don't see 3-betting this river as +EV.

[doubleatrain 0]

Reasoning?Its a KQ / KJ type hand way more often then its a set.Only thing that might make me think twice is his relative position. He could have just called the turn with a set to try and get the overcall from EP.

Granted, I play lower limits, but I don't see people raising the river after peeling with just overcards.

[jcdoerre 0]

Thanks for the advice all, he had k3. I guess I probably shouldn't have three bet, i just figured maybe he thought i had top pair and he had two overcards then caught a king.

[Actuary 3]

Thanks for the advice all, he had k3.

ahhh..you were drawing dead the whole time.

[budfox427 0]

ahhh..you were drawing dead the whole time.

Actuary owes me one keyboard, since mine is filled with Diet Coke, projected from the mouth and nose, upon reading the above post.

[SonicReducer 0]

Lay it down pre-flop snce you obviously can't handle Aces.

Thanks for the advice all, he had k3. I guess I probably shouldn't have three bet, i just figured maybe he thought i had top pair and he had two overcards then caught a king.

Of course you lost, he had the King Krabblar.Pinch Pinch

[Actuary 3]

Lay it down pre-flop snce you obviously can't handle Aces.Of course you lost, he had the King Krabblar.Pinch Pinch